{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,4]],"date-time":"2026-06-04T23:26:16Z","timestamp":1780615576128,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","onlinecjc.ca","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Canadian Journal of Cardiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,23]],"date-time":"2021-12-23T11:11:34Z","timestamp":1640257894000},"page":"355-364","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Mechanical vs Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Younger Than 70 Years of Age: A Hazard Ratio Meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"38","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2218-6072","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dror B.","family":"Leviner","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guy","family":"Witberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amos","family":"Levi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Uri","family":"Landes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Naama","family":"Schwartz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Avinoam","family":"Shiran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ran","family":"Kornowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Erez","family":"Sharoni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1847","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1613792","article-title":"Mechanical or biologic prostheses for aortic-valve and mitral-valve replacement","volume":"377","author":"Goldstone","year":"2017","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1862","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2009.07.032","article-title":"Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years","volume":"54","author":"Stassano","year":"2009","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Coll Cardiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1152","DOI":"10.1016\/S0735-1097(00)00834-2","article-title":"Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs Randomized Trial","volume":"36","author":"Hammermeister","year":"2000","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Coll Cardiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"776","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2011.04.048","article-title":"Aortic valve surgery: marked increases in volume and significant decreases in mechanical valve use\u2014an analysis of 41,227 patients over 5 years from the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland national database","volume":"142","author":"Dunning","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2020.11.035","article-title":"2020 ACC\/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology\/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines","volume":"77","author":"Otto","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Coll Cardiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"616","DOI":"10.1093\/ejcts\/ezx324","article-title":"2017 ESC\/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease","volume":"52","author":"Falk","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Cardiothorac Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.7246","article-title":"Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves","volume":"312","author":"Dvir","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2015.10.092","article-title":"Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in middle-aged adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"102","author":"Zhao","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2018.10.146","article-title":"Long-term outcomes of mechanical versus biological aortic valve prosthesis: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"158","author":"Diaz","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2017.03.011","article-title":"2017 AHA\/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA\/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology\/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines","volume":"70","author":"Nishimura","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Coll Cardiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2739","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehx391","article-title":"2017 ESC\/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease","volume":"38","author":"Baumgartner","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib12","series-title":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-12-9","article-title":"Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves","volume":"12","author":"Guyot","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","article-title":"Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Higgins","year":"2002","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"878","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2007.10.065","article-title":"Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses","volume":"135","author":"Brown","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1372","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001681","article-title":"Selection of aortic valve prostheses: contemporary reappraisal of mechanical versus biologic valve substitutes","volume":"128","author":"Suri","year":"2013","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1323","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.12679","article-title":"Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years","volume":"312","author":"Chiang","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1931","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2013.12.042","article-title":"Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis","volume":"148","author":"McClure","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1093\/icvts\/ivv347","article-title":"Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis","volume":"22","author":"Wang","year":"2016","journal-title":"Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2658","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehv580","article-title":"Aortic valve replacement with mechanical vs biological prostheses in patients aged 50-69 years","volume":"37","author":"Glaser","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1093\/ejcts\/ezu392","article-title":"Comparison between biological and mechanical aortic valve prostheses in middle-aged patients matched through propensity score analysis: long-term results","volume":"48","author":"Roumieh","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Cardiothorac Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.5761\/atcs.oa.16-00104","article-title":"Choice of aortic valve prosthesis in a rapidly aging and long-living society","volume":"22","author":"Sakamoto","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0037-1602825","article-title":"Survival and long-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement in patients aged 55 to 65 years","volume":"66","author":"Alex","year":"2018","journal-title":"Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1093\/ejcts\/ezy459","article-title":"Biological or mechanical prostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50-65 years: the ANDALVALVE study","volume":"55","author":"Rodr\u00edguez-Caulo","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Cardiothorac Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2019.10.027","article-title":"Mechanical versus biologic prostheses for surgical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70","volume":"110","author":"Kyt\u00f6","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib26","first-page":"493","article-title":"Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population","volume":"14","author":"Bottio","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Heart Valve Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2013.08.028","article-title":"Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients < 65 years old","volume":"147","author":"Kaneko","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1529","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2019.02.076","article-title":"Tissue versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in younger patients: a multicenter analysis","volume":"158","author":"Iribarne","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1262","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2015.01.052","article-title":"National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements","volume":"149","author":"Isaacs","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"4481","key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1126\/science.7455683","article-title":"The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice","volume":"211","author":"Tversky","year":"1981","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1152","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2016.02.028","article-title":"Choice of treatment for aortic valve stenosis in the era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in eastern Denmark (2005 to 2015)","volume":"9","author":"De Backer","year":"2016","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Interv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3143","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehz275","article-title":"Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: an updated meta-analysis","volume":"40","author":"Siontis","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2597","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036866","article-title":"Five-year clinical outcome and valve durability after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients","volume":"138","author":"Didier","year":"2018","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2020.08.048","article-title":"Isolated redo aortic valve replacement versus valve-in-valve transcatheter valve replacement","volume":"112","author":"Patel","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1253\/circj.CJ-14-1418","article-title":"Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation for patients with degenerative surgical bioprosthetic valves","volume":"79","author":"Dvir","year":"2015","journal-title":"Circ J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2020.10.020","article-title":"Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: an updated meta-analysis","volume":"14","author":"S\u00e1","year":"2021","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Interv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2016.03.029","article-title":"Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in transition","volume":"9","author":"Webb","year":"2016","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Interv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2020.06.010","article-title":"Transcatheter valve-in-valve aortic valve replacement as an alternative to surgical re-replacement","volume":"76","author":"Deharo","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Coll Cardiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1253\/circj.CJ-14-0684","article-title":"Atrial fibrillation at mid-term after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement\u2014implications for antithrombotic therapy","volume":"79","author":"Tosello","year":"2015","journal-title":"Circ J"},{"issue":"9813","key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61294-4","article-title":"Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data","volume":"379","author":"Heneghan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ahj.2010.05.005","article-title":"LOWERing the INtensity of oral anticoaGulant Therapy in patients with bileaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement: results from the \"LOWERING-IT\" Trial","volume":"160","author":"Torella","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am Heart J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1202","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2014.01.004","article-title":"Reduced anticoagulation after mechanical aortic valve replacement: interim results from the prospective randomized On-X valve anticoagulation clinical trial randomized Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption trial","volume":"147","author":"Puskas","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1953","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015939","article-title":"Characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe bioprosthetic aortic valve stenosis undergoing redo surgical aortic valve replacement","volume":"132","author":"Naji","year":"2015","journal-title":"Circulation"}],"container-title":["Canadian Journal of Cardiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0828282X21009624?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0828282X21009624?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T14:48:05Z","timestamp":1760107685000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0828282X21009624"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S0828282X21009624"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008","relation":{},"ISSN":["0828-282X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0828-282X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Mechanical vs Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Younger Than 70 Years of Age: A Hazard Ratio Meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.12.008","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}