{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T01:35:10Z","timestamp":1791855310325,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":94,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,1]],"date-time":"2023-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1688169600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,1]],"date-time":"2023-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1688169600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Clinical Biochemistry"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]],"date-time":"2022-08-08T21:15:56Z","timestamp":1659993356000},"page":"84-93","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Performance of saliva compared with nasopharyngeal swab for diagnosis of COVID-19 by NAAT in cross-sectional studies: Systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"117","author":[{"given":"Donald Brody","family":"Duncan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Katharine","family":"Mackett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Muhammad Usman","family":"Ali","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Deborah","family":"Yamamura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cynthia","family":"Balion","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0005","year":"2020","journal-title":"interim guidance [Internet]."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1038\/s41579-020-00461-z","article-title":"Considerations for diagnostic COVID-19 tests","volume":"19","author":"Vandenberg","year":"2021","journal-title":"Nat. Rev. Microbiol."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"672","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoto.2021.0715","article-title":"Complications of COVID-19 Nasopharyngeal Swab Test","volume":"147","author":"Koskinen","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1002\/ejp.1722","article-title":"Nasopharyngeal swab-induced pain for SARS-CoV-2 screening: A randomised controlled trial of conventional and self-swabbing","volume":"25","author":"Moisset","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur. J. Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Azzi L. Saliva is the Key Element for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Mass Screening. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021; 73(3):e566\u2013e568.","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/ciaa1440"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0030","article-title":"The infectious diseases society of america guidelines on the diagnosis of COVID-19: molecular diagnostic testing","author":"Hanson","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin. Infect. Dis."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"To KK-W, Tsang OT-Y, Yip CC-Y, et al. Consistent Detection of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Saliva. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020; 71(15):841\u2013843.","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/ciaa149"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jamal AJ, Mozafarihashjin M, Coomes E, et al. Sensitivity of Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Saliva for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021; 72(6):1064\u20131066.","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/ciaa848"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jinf.2020.04.005","article-title":"Saliva is a reliable tool to detect SARS-CoV-2","volume":"81","author":"Azzi","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Infect."},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1061","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.282.11.1061","article-title":"Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests","volume":"282","author":"Lijmer","year":"1999","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; n71.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009","article-title":"QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"155","author":"Whiting","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann. Intern. Med."},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2006.06.011","article-title":"Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach","volume":"59","author":"Chu","year":"2006","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1040","article-title":"Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression","volume":"21","author":"van Houwelingen","year":"2002","journal-title":"Statist Med."},{"issue":"24","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2273","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780122405","article-title":"A bivariate approach to meta-analysis","volume":"12","author":"Van Houwelingen","year":"1993","journal-title":"Statist Med."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022","article-title":"Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews","volume":"58","author":"Reitsma","year":"2005","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0085","unstructured":"Riley R, Abrams K, Sutton A, Lambert P, Thompson J. The benefits and limitations of multivariate meta-analysis, with application to diagnostic and prognostic studies. Technical Report 05-04. 2005."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X08319957","article-title":"Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves","volume":"28","author":"Arends","year":"2008","journal-title":"Med. Decis. Making"},{"issue":"4857","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1285","DOI":"10.1126\/science.3287615","article-title":"Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems","volume":"240","author":"Swets","year":"1988","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0100","unstructured":"Deeks J, Higgins J, Altman D, editors. Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 62 (updated February 2021) [Internet]. Cochrane; 2021. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org\/handbook."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dinnes J, Deeks J, Kirby J, Roderick P. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Health Technol Assess [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2021 Dec 9]; 9(12). Available from: https:\/\/www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk\/hta\/hta9120\/.","DOI":"10.3310\/hta9120"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.03.016","article-title":"The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability","volume":"61","author":"Hamza","year":"2008","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A. Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion. Statist Sci [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2021 Dec 9]; 16(2). Available from: https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/statistical-science\/volume-16\/issue-2\/Interval-Estimation-for-a-Binomial-Proportion\/10.1214\/ss\/1009213286.full.","DOI":"10.1214\/ss\/1009213286"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016","article-title":"The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed","volume":"58","author":"Deeks","year":"2005","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0125","series-title":"Stata statistical software","author":"StataCorp.","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0130","series-title":"Department of Radiology","article-title":"A program for meta-analytical integration of diagnostic accuracy studies in Stata. Ann Arbor, Michigan: division of nuclear medicine","author":"Dwamena","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0135","series-title":"metandi: Stata module for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy","author":"Harbord","year":"2008"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0140","article-title":"A stata command for meta-analysis and meta-regression of diagnostic test accuracy data \u2013 A Tutorial. [Internet]","author":"Nyaga","year":"2021","journal-title":"In Review"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Altawalah H, AlHuraish F, Alkandari WA, Ezzikouri S. Saliva specimens for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in Kuwait: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2020; 132:104652.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcv.2020.104652"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1330","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmi.2021.02.009","article-title":"Saliva for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 in school-age children","volume":"27","author":"Al Suwaidi","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin. Microbiol. Infect."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmoldx.2020.10.018","article-title":"Performance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 real-time RT-PCR tests on oral rinses and saliva samples","volume":"23","author":"Babady","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Mol. Diagn."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cca.2021.02.014","article-title":"Salivary SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid detection: A prospective cohort study","volume":"517","author":"Basso","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin. Chim. Acta"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2529","DOI":"10.1002\/jmv.26719","article-title":"Saliva for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2: First report from India","volume":"93","author":"Bhattacharya","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Med. Virol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0170","unstructured":"Castelain S, Fran\u00e7ois C, Demey B, et al. Comparison of nasopharyngeal and saliva swabs for the detection of RNA SARS-CoV-2 during mass screening (SALICOV study). 3."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dogan OA, Kose B, Agaoglu NB, et al. Does sampling saliva increase detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR? Comparing saliva with oro-nasopharyngeal swabs. Journal of Virological Methods. 2021; 290:114049.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jviromet.2020.114049"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3268","DOI":"10.1002\/jmv.26839","article-title":"Self-collected saliva for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A prospective study in the emergency room","volume":"93","author":"Echavarria","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Med. Virol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.03033-20","article-title":"Performance of saliva specimens for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the community setting: does sample collection method matter?","volume":"59","author":"Fern\u00e1ndez-Gonz\u00e1lez","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Clin. Microbiol."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.01418-20","article-title":"Evaluation of specimen types and saliva stabilization solutions for SARS-CoV-2 testing","volume":"59","author":"Griesemer","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Clin. Microbiol."},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.01824-20","article-title":"Self-collected anterior nasal and saliva specimens versus health care worker-collected nasopharyngeal swabs for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2","volume":"58","author":"Hanson","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Clin. Microbiol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijid.2021.02.009","article-title":"Saliva is a reliable and accessible source for the detection of SARS-CoV-2","volume":"105","author":"Herrera","year":"2021","journal-title":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.3390\/microorganisms9030642","article-title":"High efficacy of saliva in detecting SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR in adults and children","volume":"9","author":"Huber","year":"2021","journal-title":"Microorganisms."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Landry ML, Criscuolo J, Peaper DR. Challenges in use of saliva for detection of SARS CoV-2 RNA in symptomatic outpatients. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2020; 130:104567.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcv.2020.104567"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1007\/s10096-020-04090-5","article-title":"Practical challenges to the clinical implementation of saliva for SARS-CoV-2 detection","volume":"40","author":"Matic","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.01659-20","article-title":"Saliva sampling and its direct lysis, an excellent option to increase the number of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests in settings with supply shortages","volume":"58","author":"Moreno-Contreras","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Clin. Microbiol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nacher M, Mergeay-Fabre M, Blanchet D, et al. Prospective Comparison of Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Swab Sampling for Mass Screening for COVID-19. Front Med. 2021; 8:621160.","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2021.621160"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmi.2020.05.001","article-title":"Saliva sample as a non-invasive specimen for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019: a cross-sectional study","volume":"27","author":"Pasomsub","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin. Microbiol. Infect."},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.01946-20","article-title":"A direct comparison of enhanced saliva to nasopharyngeal swab for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic patients","volume":"58","author":"Procop","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Clin. Microbiol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2461","DOI":"10.1002\/jmv.26773","article-title":"COVID-19 screening test by using random oropharyngeal saliva","volume":"93","author":"Rao","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Med. Virol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3393","DOI":"10.2147\/IDR.S275152","article-title":"Saliva as an alternative specimen for molecular COVID-19 testing in community settings and population-based screening","volume":"13","author":"Senok","year":"2020","journal-title":"IDR."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2021.617399","article-title":"Performance of saliva samples for COVID-19 diagnosis by using the AllplexTM 2019-nCoV assay kit","volume":"8","author":"Tapia","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front Med."},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1314","DOI":"10.3390\/v12111314","article-title":"Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from saliva as compared to nasopharyngeal swabs in outpatients","volume":"12","author":"Kandel","year":"2020","journal-title":"Viruses."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10020299","article-title":"Self-collection of saliva specimens as a suitable alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR","volume":"10","author":"Trobajo-Sanmart\u00edn","year":"2021","journal-title":"JCM."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Becker D, Sandoval E, Amin A, et al. Saliva is less sensitive than nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 detection in the community setting [Internet]. Infectious Diseases (except HIV\/AIDS); 2020 May. Available from: http:\/\/medrxiv.org\/lookup\/doi\/10.1101\/2020.05.11.20092338.","DOI":"10.1101\/2020.05.11.20092338"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0270","first-page":":odi.13934","article-title":"The diagnostic accuracy of saliva testing for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis","author":"Atieh","year":"2021","journal-title":"Oral Dis."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.7326\/M20-6569","article-title":"The sensitivity and costs of testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection with saliva versus nasopharyngeal swabs: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"174","author":"Bastos","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ann. Intern. Med."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2020.8876","article-title":"Comparison of saliva and nasopharyngeal swab nucleic acid amplification testing for detection of SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"181","author":"Butler-Laporte","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.1016\/j.oooo.2021.01.028","article-title":"Saliva sample for the massive screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review","volume":"131","author":"Ca\u00f1ete","year":"2021","journal-title":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2020.00465","article-title":"Saliva as a candidate for COVID-19 diagnostic testing: A meta-analysis","volume":"7","author":"Czumbel","year":"2020","journal-title":"Front Med."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1186\/s40249-020-00728-w","article-title":"Saliva as a diagnostic specimen for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in suspected patients: a scoping review","volume":"9","author":"Fakheran","year":"2020","journal-title":"Infect Dis Poverty."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ibrahimi N, Delaunay-Moisan A, Hill C, et al. Screening for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR: Saliva or nasopharyngeal swab? Rapid review and meta-analysis. Darlix J-LE, editor. PLoS ONE. 2021; 16(6):e0253007.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0253007"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajic.2021.03.008","article-title":"Are saliva and deep throat sputum as reliable as common respiratory specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection? A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"49","author":"Khiabani","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am. J. Infect. Control"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1256","DOI":"10.1002\/jmv.26613","article-title":"Saliva-based testing for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A meta-analysis","volume":"93","author":"Kivel\u00e4","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Med. Virol."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.02881-20","article-title":"Performance of saliva, oropharyngeal swabs, and nasal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"59","author":"Lee","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Clin. Microbiol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16131","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-95329-4","article-title":"Detection of three pandemic causing coronaviruses from non-respiratory samples: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"11","author":"Mishra","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics11020363","article-title":"Diagnosis of SARS-Cov-2 infection by RT-PCR using specimens other than naso- and oropharyngeal swabs: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"11","author":"Moreira","year":"2021","journal-title":"Diagnostics."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jds.2021.01.010","article-title":"Comparing saliva and nasopharyngeal swab specimens in the detection of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"16","author":"Nasiri","year":"2021","journal-title":"Journal of Dental Sciences."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmoldx.2020.12.008","article-title":"Relative sensitivity of saliva and upper airway swabs for initial detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in ambulatory patients","volume":"23","author":"O\u2019Leary","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Mol. Diagn."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0340","first-page":"e2020025","article-title":"RT-qPCR assays based on saliva rather than on nasopharyngeal swabs are possible but should be interpreted with caution: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.: Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 through salivary fluids","volume":"91","author":"Ricc\u00f2","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sagredo-Olivares K, Morales-G\u00f3mez C, Aitken-Saavedra J. Evaluation of saliva as a complementary technique to the diagnosis of COVID-19: a systematic review. Med Oral. 2021; e526\u2013e532.","DOI":"10.4317\/medoral.24424"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1233","DOI":"10.1016\/S1473-3099(21)00146-8","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of different sampling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Tsang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Lancet Infect. Dis."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yokota I, Shane PY, Okada K, et al. Mass Screening of Asymptomatic Persons for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Using Saliva. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021; 73(3):e559\u2013e565.","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/ciaa1388"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1335","DOI":"10.1373\/clinchem.2005.048595","article-title":"Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"51","author":"Rutjes","year":"2005","journal-title":"Clin. Chem."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Iwasaki S, Fujisawa S, Nakakubo S, et al. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection in nasopharyngeal swab and saliva. Journal of Infection. 2020; 81(2):e145\u2013e147.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jinf.2020.05.071"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kojima N, Turner F, Slepnev V, et al. Self-Collected Oral Fluid and Nasal Swabs Demonstrate Comparable Sensitivity to Clinician Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Detection. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020; ciaa1589.","DOI":"10.1101\/2020.04.11.20062372"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.01109-20","article-title":"Saliva as an alternate specimen source for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic patients using cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2","volume":"58","author":"McCormick-Baw","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Clin. Microbiol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0380","article-title":"Saliva is more sensitive than nasopharyngeal or nasal swabs for diagnosis of asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 infection","volume":"11","author":"Teo","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wong SCY, Tse H, Siu HK, et al. Posterior Oropharyngeal Saliva for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020; 71(11):2939\u20132946.","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/ciaa797"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Miller M, Jansen M, Bisignano A, et al. Validation of a Self-administrable, Saliva-based RT-qPCR Test Detecting SARS-CoV-2 [Internet]. Infectious Diseases (except HIV\/AIDS); 2020 Jun. Available from: http:\/\/medrxiv.org\/lookup\/doi\/10.1101\/2020.06.05.20122721.","DOI":"10.1101\/2020.06.05.20122721"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.02486-20","article-title":"Pooled saliva specimens for SARS-CoV-2 testing","volume":"59","author":"Barat","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Clin. Microbiol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Migueres M, Mengelle C, Dimeglio C, et al. Saliva sampling for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infections in symptomatic patients and asymptomatic carriers. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2020; 130:104580.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcv.2020.104580"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"904","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics11050904","article-title":"SalivaSTAT: Direct-PCR and pooling of saliva samples collected in healthcare and community setting for SARS-CoV-2 mass surveillance","volume":"11","author":"Sahajpal","year":"2021","journal-title":"Diagnostics."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hamilton JR, Stahl EC, Tsuchida CA, et al. Robotic RNA extraction for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance using saliva samples. Kalendar R, editor. PLoS ONE. 2021; 16(8):e0255690.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0255690"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0415","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-06642-5","article-title":"Investigation of discordant SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results using minimally processed saliva","volume":"12","author":"White","year":"2022","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nishibata Y, Koshimoto S, Ogaki K, et al. RNase in the saliva can affect the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 by real-time one-step polymerase chain reaction using saliva samples. Pathology - Research and Practice. 2021; 220:153381.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prp.2021.153381"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0425","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vogels CBF, Watkins AE, Harden CA, et al. SalivaDirect: A simplified and flexible platform to enhance SARS-CoV-2 testing capacity. Med. 2021; 2(3):263-280.e6.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.medj.2020.12.010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2021.07.021","article-title":"Evaluating tests for diagnosing COVID-19 in the absence of a reliable reference standard: pitfalls and potential solutions","volume":"138","author":"Korevaar","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0435","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1002\/jmv.26228","article-title":"Should RT-PCR be considered a gold standard in the diagnosis of COVID-19?","volume":"93","author":"Hern\u00e1ndez\u2010Huerta","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Med. Virol."},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0440","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1454","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.6803","article-title":"Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies: Bias due to Composite Reference Standards","volume":"35","author":"Schiller","year":"2016","journal-title":"Statist Med."},{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0445","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4751","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.8999","article-title":"On the robustness of latent class models for diagnostic testing with no gold standard","volume":"40","author":"Schofield","year":"2021","journal-title":"Stat. Med."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0450","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.3470","article-title":"Modeling conditional dependence between diagnostic tests: A multiple latent variable model","volume":"28","author":"Dendukuri","year":"2009","journal-title":"Statist Med."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0455","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1002\/jmv.26349","article-title":"Detection profile of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR in different types of clinical specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"93","author":"Bwire","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Med. Virol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0460","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hou N, Wang K, Zhang H, et al. Comparison of detection rate of 16 sampling methods for respiratory viruses: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of clinical data and systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2020; 5(11):e003053.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2020-003053"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0465","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1038\/s41576-021-00408-x","article-title":"The biological and clinical significance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants","author":"Tao","year":"2021","journal-title":"Nat Rev Genet [Internet]."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004_b0470","article-title":"Duration of viral shedding and culture positivity with post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 delta variant infections","volume":"7","author":"Siedner","year":"2022","journal-title":"JCI Insight [Internet]."}],"container-title":["Clinical Biochemistry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000991202200193X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000991202200193X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,14]],"date-time":"2025-09-14T16:01:05Z","timestamp":1757865665000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S000991202200193X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]},"references-count":94,"alternative-id":["S000991202200193X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004","relation":{},"ISSN":["0009-9120"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0009-9120","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Performance of saliva compared with nasopharyngeal swab for diagnosis of COVID-19 by NAAT in cross-sectional studies: Systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Clinical Biochemistry","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2022.08.004","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}