{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]],"date-time":"2026-01-19T00:05:00Z","timestamp":1768781100697,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,1]],"date-time":"2016-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1451606400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalimaging.org","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Clinical Imaging"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,18]],"date-time":"2015-10-18T03:58:49Z","timestamp":1445140729000},"page":"68-71","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and ultrasound: which should be used for the different breast densities in breast cancer screening?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"Anna","family":"Starikov","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michele","family":"Drotman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Keith","family":"Hentel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Janine","family":"Katzen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Robert J.","family":"Min","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth Kagan","family":"Arleo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0005","author":"Administration USFaD"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.205.2.9356620","article-title":"Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging","volume":"205","author":"Niklason","year":"1997","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1298","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2011.06.011","article-title":"Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature","volume":"18","author":"Baker","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1081","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/92.13.1081","article-title":"Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers","volume":"92","author":"Mandelson","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa031759","article-title":"Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition","volume":"351","author":"Kriege","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2499","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.6095","article-title":"Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography","volume":"311","author":"Friedewald","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"772","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.14141237","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts","volume":"274","author":"Lee","year":"2015","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1573","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.32.9.1573","article-title":"Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts","volume":"32","author":"Chae","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2151","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.299.18.2151","article-title":"Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer","volume":"299","author":"Berg","year":"2008","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2014.03.012","article-title":"Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience","volume":"38","author":"Arleo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2411051504","article-title":"Performance benchmarks for screening mammography","volume":"241","author":"Rosenberg","year":"2006","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e89418","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0089418","article-title":"Addressing the challenge of assessing physician-level screening performance: mammography as an example","volume":"9","author":"Burnside","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0070","series-title":"Mammography","article-title":"ACR BI-RADS Atlas Fifth Edition Quick Reference","author":"(ACR). ACoR","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"616","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.07.2231","article-title":"Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography","volume":"189","author":"Poplack","year":"2007","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0080","article-title":"Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice","volume":"1\u20137","author":"Greenberg","year":"2014","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0085","series-title":"ACR Statement on Breast Tomosynthesis","author":"(ACR) ACoR","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.13.11520","article-title":"Digital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical care","volume":"202","author":"Kopans","year":"2014","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0095","first-page":"348","article-title":"Screening mammography recall rate: does practice site matter?","author":"Rothschild","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.177.3.1770543","article-title":"Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography","volume":"177","author":"Yankaskas","year":"2001","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.14140317","article-title":"Changes in recall type and patient treatment following implementation of screening digital breast tomosynthesis","volume":"274","author":"Lourenco","year":"2015","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13131391","article-title":"Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images","volume":"271","author":"Skaane","year":"2014","journal-title":"Radiology"}],"container-title":["Clinical Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0899707115002673?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0899707115002673?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,18]],"date-time":"2018-09-18T17:59:13Z","timestamp":1537293553000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0899707115002673"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S0899707115002673"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["0899-7071"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0899-7071","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and ultrasound: which should be used for the different breast densities in breast cancer screening?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Clinical Imaging","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.10.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}