{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,13]],"date-time":"2025-05-13T17:35:53Z","timestamp":1747157753970,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,1]],"date-time":"2016-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1467331200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalimaging.org","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Clinical Imaging"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,20]],"date-time":"2016-02-20T02:47:41Z","timestamp":1455936461000},"page":"714-719","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Appendiceal location analysis and review of the misdiagnosis rate of appendicitis associated with deep pelvic cecum on multidetector computed tomography"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"40","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0068-9413","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gil-Sun","family":"Hong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Choong Wook","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4682-1894","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mi-hyun","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3361-5496","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cherry","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.180.1.2052679","article-title":"Acute appendicitis: the radiologist\u2019s role","volume":"180","author":"Brown","year":"1991","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.215.2.r00ma24337","article-title":"Appendicitis at the millennium","volume":"215","author":"Birnbaum","year":"2000","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2213001581","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis","volume":"221","author":"Wijetunga","year":"2001","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.216.1.r00jl34172","article-title":"Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparison of 5- and 10-mm CT sections in the same patient","volume":"216","author":"Weltman","year":"2000","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1016\/S0009-9260(98)80290-0","article-title":"Imaging of acute right lower abdominal quadrant pain","volume":"53","author":"Rao","year":"1998","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.75.897.750775","article-title":"Appendicitis: spectrum of appearances on helical CT","volume":"75","author":"See","year":"2002","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0035","first-page":"204","article-title":"Mobile cecal syndrome in the adult","volume":"42","author":"Printen","year":"1976","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02553011","article-title":"Mobile cecum syndrome","volume":"27","author":"Rogers","year":"1984","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-007-3620-7","article-title":"Laparoscopic cecopexy for mobile cecum syndrome manifesting as cecal volvulus: report of a case","volume":"38","author":"Tsushimi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.5812\/iranjradiol.11076","article-title":"Gangrenous appendicitis in a boy with mobile caecum","volume":"12","author":"Keskin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Iran J Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pedneo.2015.01.007","article-title":"An unusual presentation of acute appendicitis with mobile cecum syndrome","author":"Jean","year":"2015","journal-title":"Pediatr Neonatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2055","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-006-0527-4","article-title":"Acute appendicitis: diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT with selective use of contrast in routine clinical settings","volume":"17","author":"Tamburrini","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2596","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-003-1887-7","article-title":"Multi-slice spiral CT in routine diagnosis of suspected acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis: a prospective study of 120 patients","volume":"13","author":"Werner","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1199","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.161.6.8249725","article-title":"Diagnosis of appendicitis: imaging findings in patients with atypical clinical features","volume":"161","author":"Wong","year":"1993","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1007\/s10140-007-0658-1","article-title":"Difficulties in the diagnosis of appendicitis: review of CT and US images","volume":"14","author":"Kosaka","year":"2007","journal-title":"Emerg Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01213282","article-title":"Disorders in fixation of the cecum and ascending colon","volume":"20","author":"Javors","year":"1995","journal-title":"Abdom Imaging"},{"year":"2013","series-title":"Clinically oriented anatomy","author":"Moore","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0085"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6109(05)70407-2","article-title":"Appendix and cecum: embryology, anatomy, and surgical applications","volume":"80","author":"Schumpelick","year":"2000","journal-title":"Surg Clin North Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0095","article-title":"Diagnosis of appendicitis in patients with abnormal position of the appendix due to mobile caecum","volume":"2012","author":"Toprak","year":"2012","journal-title":"Case Rep Surg"},{"year":"2014","series-title":"Textbook of anatomy abdomen and lower limb","author":"Singh","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0100"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-194104000-00007","article-title":"Topography and development of the cecum-appendix","volume":"113","author":"De Garis","year":"1941","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2096","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-005-2784-z","article-title":"CT appearance of the normal appendix in adults","volume":"15","author":"Tamburrini","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/S0887-2171(99)90039-2","article-title":"Appendicitis and its mimickers","volume":"20","author":"Lane","year":"1999","journal-title":"Semin Ultrasound CT MR"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.160.4.8456661","article-title":"Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT","volume":"160","author":"Malone","year":"1993","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.184.3.01840855","article-title":"Why we miss the diagnosis of appendicitis on abdominal CT: evaluation of imaging features of appendicitis incorrectly diagnosed on CT","volume":"184","author":"Levine","year":"2005","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2202001557","article-title":"Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material","volume":"220","author":"Jacobs","year":"2001","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1006\/jsre.2002.6407","article-title":"CT scan in the management of acute appendicitis","volume":"105","author":"Ujiki","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1040","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1553-2712.2006.tb00275.x","article-title":"Length of stay by route of contrast administration for diagnosis of appendicitis by computed-tomography scan","volume":"13","author":"Berg","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acad Emerg Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"768","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.1998.222_a.x","article-title":"Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates","volume":"93","author":"Balthazar","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.136.5.556","article-title":"Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis","volume":"136","author":"Lee","year":"2001","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"474","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2005.03.037","article-title":"A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults","volume":"190","author":"Anderson","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1282","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.09.2336","article-title":"Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only","volume":"193","author":"Anderson","year":"2009","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013_bb0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1765","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajem.2012.02.011","article-title":"Intravenous contrast alone vs intravenous and oral contrast computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients","volume":"30","author":"Kepner","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Emerg Med"}],"container-title":["Clinical Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0899707116000486?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0899707116000486?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,14]],"date-time":"2018-09-14T21:52:00Z","timestamp":1536961920000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0899707116000486"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S0899707116000486"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013","relation":{},"ISSN":["0899-7071"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0899-7071"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Appendiceal location analysis and review of the misdiagnosis rate of appendicitis associated with deep pelvic cecum on multidetector computed tomography","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Clinical Imaging","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinimag.2016.02.013","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}