{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,31]],"date-time":"2025-10-31T22:04:19Z","timestamp":1761948259574,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,1]],"date-time":"2017-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1493596800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalimaging.org","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Clinical Imaging"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,1]],"date-time":"2017-03-01T20:32:33Z","timestamp":1488400353000},"page":"117-121","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Unenhanced computed tomography for normal appendix detection: comparison of low-dose with statistical iterative reconstruction and regular-dose with filtered back projection"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Hwi Ryong","family":"Park","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4155-9260","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sung Bin","family":"Park","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eun Sun","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hyun Jeong","family":"Park","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jong Beum","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yang Soo","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"910","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734","article-title":"The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States","volume":"132","author":"Addiss","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.215.2.r00ma24337","article-title":"Appendicitis at the millennium","volume":"215","author":"Birnbaum","year":"2000","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2321031115","article-title":"Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT","volume":"232","author":"Keyzer","year":"2004","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2011.07.010","article-title":"ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) right lower quadrant pain\u2013suspected appendicitis","volume":"8","author":"Rosen","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.14.12750","article-title":"Performance of CT examinations in children with suspected acute appendicitis in the community setting: a need for more education","volume":"204","author":"Kim","year":"2015","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1007\/s00247-015-3491-9","article-title":"Appendiceal diameter: CT versus sonographic measurements","volume":"46","author":"Orscheln","year":"2016","journal-title":"Pediatr Radiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1007\/s00247-004-1179-7","article-title":"Imaging the child with right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: current concepts","volume":"34","author":"Sivit","year":"2004","journal-title":"Pediatr Radiol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1007\/s00247-012-2358-6","article-title":"A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography?","volume":"42","author":"Trout","year":"2012","journal-title":"Pediatr Radiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"732","DOI":"10.1097\/RCT.0b013e318033c7de","article-title":"Computed tomography evaluation of the normal appendix: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography","volume":"31","author":"Karabulut","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Comput Assist Tomogr"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2513081617","article-title":"Detection of the normal appendix with low-dose unenhanced CT: use of the sliding slab averaging technique","volume":"251","author":"Joo","year":"2009","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"W384","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.14.13241","article-title":"CT radiation dose and iterative reconstruction techniques","volume":"204","author":"Padole","year":"2015","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10091487","article-title":"Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique","volume":"256","author":"Prakash","year":"2010","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1007\/s11547-014-0441-9","article-title":"Hybrid iterative reconstruction technique for liver CT scans for image noise reduction and image quality improvement: evaluation of the optimal iterative reconstruction strengths","volume":"120","author":"Song","year":"2015","journal-title":"Radiol Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1177\/0284185113494980","article-title":"Hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm in brain CT: a radiation dose reduction and image quality assessment study","volume":"55","author":"Love","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1097\/RCT.0000000000000455","article-title":"Comparison of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction and hybrid reconstruction techniques for liver CT evaluation of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma","volume":"40","author":"Park","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Comput Assist Tomogr"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2432","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-015-0411-2","article-title":"CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: image quality of ultralow-dose (Sub mSv) CT with knowledge-based iterative reconstruction and diagnostic performance of low-dose CT with statistical iterative reconstruction","volume":"40","author":"Hur","year":"2015","journal-title":"Abdom Imaging"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2014.11.021","article-title":"Usefulness of low-dose nonenhanced computed tomography with iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urolithiasis: diagnostic performance and agreement between the urologist and the radiologist","volume":"85","author":"Kwon","year":"2015","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10100047","article-title":"Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product","volume":"257","author":"Deak","year":"2010","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1058","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2016.03.016","article-title":"Low-dose abdominal computed tomography for detection of urinary stone disease - impact of additional spectral shaping of the X-ray beam on image quality and dose parameters","volume":"85","author":"Dewes","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1097\/01.rct.0000164668.03767.53","article-title":"Visualization rate and pattern of normal appendix on multidetector computed tomography by using multiplanar reformation display","volume":"29","author":"Jan","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Comput Assist Tomogr"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.168.2.9016216","article-title":"Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis","volume":"168","author":"Lane","year":"1997","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.213.2.r99nv44341","article-title":"Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients","volume":"213","author":"Lane","year":"1999","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"897","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.75.897.750721","article-title":"Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis","volume":"75","author":"Ege","year":"2002","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2252011551","article-title":"Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT","volume":"225","author":"Benjaminov","year":"2002","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0125","first-page":"45","article-title":"Evaluation of the normal appendix at low-dose non-enhanced spiral CT","volume":"11","author":"Bursali","year":"2005","journal-title":"Diagn Interv Radiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1275","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.169.5.9353441","article-title":"Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis","volume":"169","author":"Rao","year":"1997","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.171.4.9762983","article-title":"Using unenhanced helical CT with enteric contrast material for suspected appendicitis in patients treated at a community hospital","volume":"171","author":"Funaki","year":"1998","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.216.1.r00jl34172","article-title":"Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparison of 5- and 10-mm CT sections in the same patient","volume":"216","author":"Weltman","year":"2000","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2202001557","article-title":"Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material","volume":"220","author":"Jacobs","year":"2001","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2213001581","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis","volume":"221","author":"Wijetunga","year":"2001","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1007\/s10140-003-0319-y","article-title":"Rapid CT scan visualization of the appendix and early acute non-perforated appendicitis using an improved oral contrast method","volume":"10","author":"Giuliano","year":"2004","journal-title":"Emerg Radiol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2096","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-005-2784-z","article-title":"CT appearance of the normal appendix in adults","volume":"15","author":"Tamburrini","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1007\/s10140-005-0414-3","article-title":"CT method for visualization of the appendix using a fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate\u2013clinical experience in 525 cases","volume":"11","author":"Giuliano","year":"2005","journal-title":"Emerg Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2362040984","article-title":"Comparison of US and unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis","volume":"236","author":"Keyzer","year":"2005","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1007\/s10140-006-0491-y","article-title":"Multidetector-row CT of the appendix in healthy adults","volume":"12","author":"Johnson","year":"2006","journal-title":"Emerg Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.07.3016","article-title":"Normal appendix in adults: reproducibility of detection with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MDCT","volume":"191","author":"Keyzer","year":"2008","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"758","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2012.01.028","article-title":"Evaluation of normal appendix vermiformis in adults with multidetector computed tomography","volume":"36","author":"Turkoglu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010_bb0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0096476","article-title":"The normal appendix on CT: does size matter?","volume":"9","author":"Willekens","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS One"}],"container-title":["Clinical Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0899707117300335?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0899707117300335?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,3]],"date-time":"2018-09-03T18:54:38Z","timestamp":1536000878000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0899707117300335"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,5]]},"references-count":38,"alternative-id":["S0899707117300335"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010","relation":{},"ISSN":["0899-7071"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0899-7071"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Unenhanced computed tomography for normal appendix detection: comparison of low-dose with statistical iterative reconstruction and regular-dose with filtered back projection","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Clinical Imaging","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinimag.2017.02.010","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}