{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,26]],"date-time":"2026-02-26T15:44:45Z","timestamp":1772120685555,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":59,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,6,1]],"date-time":"2011-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1306886400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clinics in Perinatology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,20]],"date-time":"2011-04-20T08:38:22Z","timestamp":1303288702000},"page":"265-275","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["The Influence of Intrapartum Factors on Risk of Uterine Rupture and Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"38","author":[{"given":"Rosalie M.","family":"Grivell","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Merlyn P.","family":"Barreto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jodie M.","family":"Dodd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib1","series-title":"Australia\u2019s mothers and babies 2007","author":"Laws","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib2","series-title":"Births: final data for 2006, vol. 57","author":"Martin","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib3","series-title":"Hospital episode statistics. Method of delivery, 1980 to 2007\u20138","author":"HES Online","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib4","series-title":"European perinatal health report","author":"Zeitlin","year":"2004"},{"issue":"7222","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1397","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.319.7222.1397","article-title":"Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study","volume":"319","author":"Belizan","year":"1999","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2000.tb03175.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: an Australian multicentre study. VBAC Study Group","volume":"40","author":"Appleton","year":"2000","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00263-9","article-title":"Once a cesarean, always a controversy","volume":"90","author":"Flamm","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"191","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib8","first-page":"1","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights","volume":"191","author":"Guise","year":"2010","journal-title":"Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199806000-00018","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean","volume":"41","author":"McMahon","year":"1998","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-3016.2000.00299.x","article-title":"Vaginal births after Caesarean (VBAC): a population study","volume":"14","author":"Stone","year":"2000","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib11","series-title":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report","author":"Thomas","year":"2001"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1385","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11008.x","article-title":"Trial of labour after caesarean section in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis","volume":"104","author":"Boulvain","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"35","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib13","first-page":"1","article-title":"Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States","volume":"35","author":"Menacker","year":"2010","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib14","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2007","volume":"57","author":"Martin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115044","article-title":"Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity","volume":"184","author":"Hibbard","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"345","author":"Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199901073400112","article-title":"The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate","volume":"340","author":"Sachs","year":"1999","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"20","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2684","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.20.2684","article-title":"Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies","volume":"287","author":"Smith","year":"2002","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"25","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1656","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.04.002","article-title":"Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study","volume":"193","author":"Macones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199609053351001","article-title":"Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section","volume":"335","author":"McMahon","year":"1996","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.04.025","article-title":"Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis","volume":"199","author":"Rossi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1221","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00725.x","article-title":"WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture","volume":"112","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00531-0","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system","volume":"90","author":"Flamm","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-835961","article-title":"Variables associated with successful vaginal birth after one cesarean section: a proposed vaginal birth after cesarean section score","volume":"21","author":"Gonen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"3 Pt 2","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","article-title":"The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery","volume":"193","author":"Landon","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib27","first-page":"257","article-title":"Predictors of repeat cesarean delivery after trial of labor: do any exist?","volume":"182","author":"Learman","year":"1996","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.109386","article-title":"Predicting outcomes of trials of labor in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a comparison of multivariate methods with neural networks","volume":"184","author":"Macones","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f2de49","article-title":"New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted?","volume":"116","author":"Eden","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03126.x","article-title":"Induction of labour after 1 previous Caesarean section","volume":"39","author":"McNally","year":"1999","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib31","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1644","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.075","article-title":"Modified Bishop\u2019s score and induction of labor in patients with a previous cesarean delivery","volume":"191","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000115508.75370.23","article-title":"Induction of labor after one prior cesarean: predictors of vaginal delivery","volume":"103","author":"Grinstead","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02","article-title":"Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"109","author":"Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.03.023","article-title":"Risk factors for uterine rupture during a vaginal birth after one previous caesarean section: a case-control study","volume":"151","author":"Weimar","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109148.23082.C1","article-title":"Cervical ripening with transcervical Foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture","volume":"103","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0004-8666.2003.00073.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: a survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand","volume":"43","author":"Dodd","year":"2003","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00355-7","article-title":"Spontaneous versus induced labor after a previous cesarean delivery","volume":"102","author":"Delaney","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000254169.49346.e9","article-title":"Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean","volume":"109","author":"Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)01175-3","article-title":"Trial of labor after 40 weeks\u2019 gestation in women with prior cesarean","volume":"97","author":"Zelop","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00446-3","article-title":"Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss Working Group of Obstetric and Gynecologic Institutions","volume":"93","author":"Rageth","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610410001660751","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture following induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section in a large UK teaching hospital","volume":"24","author":"Chilaka","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1176","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109037","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"183","author":"Ravasia","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2004.00257.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean for women with a single prior caesarean birth: a systematic review of the literature","volume":"44","author":"Dodd","year":"2004","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib45","series-title":"National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Induction of labour\u2014clinical guideline","year":"2008"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00623.x","article-title":"The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patients with prior caesarean delivery: a systematic review","volume":"112","author":"McDonagh","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(74)90608-5","article-title":"The effect of pregnancy and labor on the human cervix: changes in collagen, glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans","volume":"120","author":"Danforth","year":"1974","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"662","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(83)90446-5","article-title":"Ripening of the human uterine cervix related to changes in collagen, glycosaminoglycans, and collagenolytic activity","volume":"147","author":"Uldbjerg","year":"1983","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e252","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020252","article-title":"Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section","volume":"2","author":"Smith","year":"2005","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.117361","article-title":"Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing\u00a0>4000 g","volume":"185","author":"Zelop","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)01171-6","article-title":"Oxytocin dose and the risk of uterine rupture in trial of labor after cesarean","volume":"97","author":"Goetzl","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.001","article-title":"Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"199","author":"Cahill","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001233","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"4","author":"Boulvain","year":"2001","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b8fa00","article-title":"Serial membrane sweeping at term in planned vaginal birth after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"114","author":"Hamdan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00464-X","article-title":"Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour","volume":"100","author":"Spaans","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.x","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study","volume":"117","author":"Dekker","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-981433","article-title":"Intrapartum predictors of uterine rupture","volume":"24","author":"Craver Pryor","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"506","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000113619.67704.99","article-title":"Fetal heart rate changes associated with uterine rupture","volume":"103","author":"Ridgeway","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7456","key":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.329.7456.19","article-title":"Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section","volume":"329","author":"Guise","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["Clinics in Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0095510811000273?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0095510811000273?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,3]],"date-time":"2018-12-03T04:20:33Z","timestamp":1543810833000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0095510811000273"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,6]]},"references-count":59,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0095510811000273"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006","relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.3410\/f.11565957.12621054","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0095-5108"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0095-5108","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,6]]}}}