{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T17:13:34Z","timestamp":1784740414222,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2004,11,1]],"date-time":"2004-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1099267200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2004,10,27]],"date-time":"2004-10-27T17:48:58Z","timestamp":1098899338000},"page":"393-399","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"title":["Medical versus surgical abortion efficacy, complications and leave of absence compared in a partly randomized study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"70","author":[{"given":"Christina","family":"R\u00f8rbye","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mogens","family":"N\u00f8rgaard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lisbeth","family":"Nilas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.1.92","article-title":"A randomized comparison of medical abortion and surgical vacuum aspiration at 10\u201313 weeks gestation","volume":"17","author":"Ashok","year":"2002","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2167","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138412","article-title":"A comparison of medical abortion (using mifepristone and gemeprost) with surgical vacuum aspiration: efficacy and early medical sequelae","volume":"9","author":"Henshaw","year":"1994","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.1.67","article-title":"A comparative study of surgical and medical procedures: 932 pregnancy terminations up to 63 days gestation","volume":"16","author":"Child","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(84)90016-7","article-title":"Randomized comparison of prostaglandin treatment in hospital or at home with vacuum aspiration for termination of early pregnancy","volume":"29","author":"Rosen","year":"1984","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(91)90085-Y","article-title":"Mifepristone or vacuum aspiration in termination of early pregnancy","volume":"41","author":"Legarth","year":"1991","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(99)00016-5","article-title":"Outcomes of suction curettage and mifepristone abortion in the United States. A prospective comparison study","volume":"59","author":"Jensen","year":"1999","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70511-8","article-title":"Safety, efficacy, and acceptability of medical abortion in China, Cuba, and India: a comparative trial of mifepristone\u2013misoprostol versus surgical abortion","volume":"176","author":"Winikoff","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(00)00151-7","article-title":"Randomized comparison of efficacy, acceptability and cost of medical versus surgical abortion","volume":"62","author":"Creinin","year":"2000","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06868.x","article-title":"Early pregnancy termination: a comparison between vacuum aspiration and medical abortion using prostaglandin (16,16 dimethyl-trans-delta 2-PGE1 methyl ester) or the antiprogestogen RU 486","volume":"95","author":"Cameron","year":"1988","journal-title":"Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(96)00252-1","article-title":"The efficacy and tolerance of mifepristone and prostaglandin in termination of pregnancy of less than 63 days gestation\u2014final results","volume":"55","year":"1997","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199003083221001","article-title":"Voluntary interruption of pregnancy with mifepristone (RU 486) and a prostaglandin analogue. A large-scale French experience","volume":"322","author":"Silvestre","year":"1990","journal-title":"N. Engl. J. Med."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349209021052","article-title":"Medical termination of early pregnancy with mifepristone (RU 486) followed by a prostaglandin analogue. Study in 16,369 women","volume":"71","author":"Ulmann","year":"1992","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib13","first-page":"1677","article-title":"Factors associated with immediate abortion complications","volume":"154","author":"Ferris","year":"1996","journal-title":"CMAJ, Can. Med. Assoc. J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib14","first-page":"129","article-title":"Complications of first-trimester abortion: a report of 170,000 cases","volume":"76","author":"Hakim-Elahi","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2002.810410.x","article-title":"Short-term complications after surgically induced abortions: a register-based study of 56,117 abortions","volume":"81","author":"Zhou","year":"2002","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00406-8","article-title":"Methotrexate and misoprostol when surgical abortion fails","volume":"87","author":"Schaff","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"480","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02516.x","article-title":"The efficacy and tolerance of mifepristone and prostaglandin in first trimester termination of pregnancy","volume":"97","year":"1990","journal-title":"Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1080\/j.1600-0412.1999.780913.x","article-title":"Interruption of early pregnancy with mifepristone in combination with gemeprost","volume":"78","author":"Sandstrom","year":"1999","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(00)00187-6","article-title":"Parity is a major determinant of success rate in medical abortion: a retrospective analysis of 3161 consecutive cases of early medical abortion treated with reduced doses of mifepristone and vaginal gemeprost","volume":"62","author":"Bartley","year":"2000","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(99)00115-8","article-title":"The efficacy of medical abortion: a meta-analysis","volume":"61","author":"Kahn","year":"2000","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(03)00175-6","article-title":"Medical abortion. Defining success and categorizing failures","volume":"68","author":"Rorbye","year":"2003","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000124271.23499.84","article-title":"A randomized comparison of misoprostol 6 to 8 hours versus 24 hours after mifepristone for abortion","volume":"103","author":"Creinin","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2098","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.10.2098","article-title":"Double-blind randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with vaginal gemeprost or misoprostol for induction of abortion up to 63 days gestation","volume":"16","author":"Bartley","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1502","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138287","article-title":"The effect of dose of mifepristone and gestation on the efficacy of medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol","volume":"8","author":"McKinley","year":"1993","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2001.d01-462.x","article-title":"Medical abortion at 57 to 63 days' gestation with a lower dose of mifepristone and gemeprost. A randomized controlled trial","volume":"80","year":"2001","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(79)90731-2","article-title":"Local versus general anesthesia: which is safer for performing suction curettage abortions?","volume":"135","author":"Grimes","year":"1979","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00272-0","article-title":"Evacuation interval after vaginal misoprostol for preabortion cervical priming: a randomized trial","volume":"94","author":"Singh","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08241.x","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming: is there an optimal evacuation time interval?","volume":"106","author":"Singh","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15308.x","article-title":"Morbidity following pelvic inflammatory disease","volume":"100","author":"Buchan","year":"1993","journal-title":"Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(86)90082-7","article-title":"Sequelae of induced first-trimester abortion. A prospective study assessing the role of postabortal pelvic inflammatory disease and prophylactic antibiotics","volume":"155","author":"Heisterberg","year":"1986","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1222","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09633.x","article-title":"Impact of the introduction of new medical methods on therapeutic abortions at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh","volume":"103","author":"Cameron","year":"1996","journal-title":"Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348909015747","article-title":"Somatic complications and contraceptive techniques following legal abortion","volume":"68","author":"Fried","year":"1989","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348709020747","article-title":"Early complications after induced first-trimester abortion","volume":"66","author":"Heisterberg","year":"1987","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00151718","article-title":"General anaesthesia, a risk factor for complication following induced abortion?","volume":"6","author":"Osborn","year":"1990","journal-title":"Eur. J. Epidemiol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1016\/S1049-3867(00)00061-X","article-title":"Time lost from work among women choosing medical or surgical abortions","volume":"10","author":"Wiebe","year":"2000","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(92)90106-4","article-title":"Conditions for choosing between drug-induced and surgical abortions","volume":"45","author":"Bachelot","year":"1992","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1088","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2003.02395.x","article-title":"Randomised controlled trial of total compared with subtotal hysterectomy with one-year follow up results","volume":"110","author":"Gimbel","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(99)00141-9","article-title":"Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review","volume":"52","author":"Ross","year":"1999","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(97)00223-6","article-title":"Selection bias in a study on how women experienced induced abortion","volume":"77","author":"Soderberg","year":"1998","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782404001672?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782404001672?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,2]],"date-time":"2019-02-02T14:23:19Z","timestamp":1549117399000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782404001672"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2004,11]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782404001672"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.004","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2004,11]]}}}