{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,29]],"date-time":"2026-08-29T07:08:08Z","timestamp":1787987288773,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,5,1]],"date-time":"2010-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1272672000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,2,20]],"date-time":"2010-02-20T04:39:04Z","timestamp":1266640744000},"page":"367-371","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":92,"title":["Use of the Mirena\u2122 LNG-IUS and Paragard\u2122 CuT380A intrauterine devices in nulliparous women"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"81","member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0005","unstructured":"Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson A, Cates W, Stewart F, Kowal D. Contraceptive technology 19th edition; 2008."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200501000-00060","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin #59","volume":"105","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0015","author":"The Guttmacher Institute"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0020","unstructured":"National Survey of Family Growth 2002, Centers for disease control and prevention."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01726-4","article-title":"Obstetrician\u2013gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice","volume":"99","author":"Stanwood","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0030","first-page":"560","article-title":"The evidence is in. Why are IUDs still out? Family physicians' perceptions of risk and indications","volume":"54","author":"Stubbs","year":"2008","journal-title":"Can Fam Physician"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.05.085","article-title":"Attitudes towards long-acting reversible methods of contraception in general practice in the UK","volume":"76","author":"Wellings","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1417","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000245447.56585.a0","article-title":"Young women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices","volume":"108","author":"Stanwood","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1783\/147118906776276170","article-title":"What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study","volume":"32","author":"Asker","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0050","unstructured":"Available online at: http:\/\/www.paragard.com\/health_care_professional\/global\/pdf\/Prescribing-Info.pdf (Accessed March 2009)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0055","unstructured":"Available online at: http:\/\/berlex.bayerhealthcare.com\/html\/products\/pi\/Mirena_PI.pdf (Accessed March 2009)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0060","series-title":"Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2004"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2003.11.008","article-title":"Clinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative study","volume":"69","author":"Suhonen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1080\/02699200802253706","article-title":"Experience of IUD\/IUS insertions and clinical performance in nulliparous women \u2014 a pilot study","volume":"13","author":"Brockmeyer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.12.021","article-title":"Ease of insertion, contraceptive efficacy and safety of new T-shaped levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems","volume":"71","author":"Wildemeersch","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1080\/13625180802706059","article-title":"The Femilis LNG-IUS: contraceptive performance \u2014 an interim analysis","volume":"14","author":"Wildemeersch","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.01.018","article-title":"The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in nulliparous women","volume":"75","author":"Prager","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(91)90149-A","article-title":"Prolonged intrauterine contraception: a seven year randomized study of the levonorgestrel 20 mcg\/day (LNg 20) and the Copper T380 Ag IUDs","volume":"44","author":"Sivin","year":"1991","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.3109\/13814780409044540","article-title":"Complications of the intrauterine device in nulliparous and parous women","volume":"10","author":"Veldhuis","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Gen Pract"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(95)00025-9","article-title":"Intrauterine contraception in nulligravid vs parous women","volume":"53","author":"Due\u00f1as","year":"1996","journal-title":"Contraception."},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.12.005","article-title":"Copper intrauterine device use by nulliparous women: review of side effects","volume":"75","author":"Hubacher","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(99)00077-3","article-title":"Analysis of client characteristics that may affect early discontinuation of the TCu-380A IUD","volume":"60","author":"Rivera","year":"1999","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1080\/ejc.8.3.150.155","article-title":"Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices","volume":"8","author":"Caliskan","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1975.03240190015009","article-title":"The Dalkon Shield controversy. Structural and bacteriological studies of IUD tails","volume":"231","author":"Tatum","year":"1975","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(95)00253-7","article-title":"Evidence against tailstrings increasing the rate of pelvic inflammatory disease among IUD users","volume":"53","author":"Ebi","year":"1996","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0130","first-page":"1","article-title":"Type of intrauterine device and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease","volume":"62","author":"Lee","year":"1983","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0135","first-page":"1","article-title":"The intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease revisited: new results from the Women's Health Study","volume":"72","author":"Lee","year":"1988","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8796","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)91904-M","article-title":"Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective","volume":"339","author":"Farley","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199102000-00019","article-title":"Protective effect of intrauterine release of levonorgestrel on pelvic infection: three years' comparative experience of levonorgestrel- and copper-releasing intrauterine devices","volume":"77","author":"Toivonen","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(85)90048-4","article-title":"Return to fertility after IUD removal for planned pregnancy","volume":"32","author":"Randic","year":"1985","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"561","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa010438","article-title":"Use of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid women","volume":"345","author":"Hubacher","year":"2001","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1783\/147118903101197854","article-title":"Intrauterine device insertion-related complications: can they be predicted?","volume":"29","author":"Farmer","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1272","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.08.022","article-title":"Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofen","volume":"195","author":"Hubacher","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0170","first-page":"68","article-title":"Cervical priming with misoprostol prior to transcervical procedures","volume":"99","author":"Fiala","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2647","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem244","article-title":"Cervical priming with sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"22","author":"S\u00e4\u00e4v","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007373.pub2","article-title":"Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion","author":"Allen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"ACOG Committee Opinion No. 392. Intrauterine device and adolescents Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110(6):1493\u20135 [Evidence grade: III].","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000291575.93944.1a"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1363\/3809006","article-title":"Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001","volume":"38","author":"Finer","year":"2006","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e32830a98f8","article-title":"Intrauterine devices and adolescents","volume":"20","author":"Gold","year":"2008","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(02)00519-X","article-title":"A comparative randomized study of three different IUDs in nulliparous Mexican women","volume":"67","author":"Otero-Flores","year":"2003","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2003.10.012","article-title":"Problems in the conduct and analysis of \u201ca comparative randomized study of three different IUDs in nulliparous Mexican women\u201d","volume":"69","author":"Sivin","year":"2004","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010_bb0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.12.011","article-title":"Copper-containing, framed intrauterine devices for contraception: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials","volume":"77","author":"O'Brien","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782410000119?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782410000119?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,26]],"date-time":"2019-05-26T00:41:13Z","timestamp":1558831273000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782410000119"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,5]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782410000119"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,5]]}}}