{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,28]],"date-time":"2026-10-28T02:24:23Z","timestamp":1793154263347,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,12,1]],"date-time":"2011-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1322697600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,5,7]],"date-time":"2011-05-07T20:23:42Z","timestamp":1304799822000},"page":"571-577","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":38,"title":["Comparison of contraceptive method chosen by women with and without a recent history of induced abortion"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"84","author":[{"given":"Tessa","family":"Madden","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gina M.","family":"Secura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jenifer E.","family":"Allsworth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeffrey F.","family":"Peipert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1363\/3809006","article-title":"Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001","volume":"38","author":"Finer","year":"2006","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1363\/4000608","article-title":"Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services 2005","volume":"40","author":"Jones","year":"2008","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1363\/4009408","article-title":"Factors associated with contraceptive choice and inconsistent method use, United States, 2004","volume":"40","author":"Frost","year":"2008","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.2307\/3097748","article-title":"Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000\u20132001","volume":"34","author":"Jones","year":"2002","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Trussell J, Vaughan B. Contraceptive failure, method-related discontinuation and resumption of use: results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31:64\u201372, 93.","DOI":"10.2307\/2991641"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0030","first-page":"355","article-title":"Unintended pregnancies and use, misuse and discontinuation of oral contraceptives","volume":"40","author":"Rosenberg","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0035","series-title":"Contraceptive technology","article-title":"Contraceptive efficacy","author":"Trussell","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0040","first-page":"1","article-title":"Use of contraception in the United States: 1982\u20132008: data from the National Survey of Family Growth","volume":"29","author":"Mosher","year":"2010","journal-title":"Vital Health Stat"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e3181a2af8f","article-title":"Trends in abortion in the United States","volume":"52","author":"Jones","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.03.011","article-title":"Patterns of contraceptive use before and after an abortion: results from a nationally representative survey of women undergoing an abortion in France","volume":"82","author":"Moreau","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.003","article-title":"Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion","volume":"78","author":"Goodman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.09.003","article-title":"Barriers associated with the failure to return for intrauterine device insertion following first-trimester abortion","volume":"79","author":"Stanek","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.017","article-title":"The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"203","author":"Secura","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:24\u20139, 46.","DOI":"10.2307\/2991522"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0075","unstructured":"Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF, Stanwood NL. Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev;6:CD001777."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.02.009","article-title":"Social desirability bias in family planning studies: a neglected problem","volume":"80","author":"Stuart","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.05.015","article-title":"Provision of long-acting reversible contraception at US abortion facilities and barriers to immediate postabortion insertion (abstract only)","volume":"80","author":"Harper","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782411001508?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782411001508?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,10]],"date-time":"2019-06-10T16:10:18Z","timestamp":1560183018000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782411001508"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782411001508"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.018","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}}}