{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T18:03:28Z","timestamp":1790186608113,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","contraceptionjournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,24]],"date-time":"2011-07-24T18:07:07Z","timestamp":1311530827000},"page":"51-55","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":45,"title":["Preventing repeat abortion in Canada: is the immediate insertion of intrauterine devices postabortion a cost-effective option associated with fewer repeat abortions?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"85","author":[{"given":"Christina M.","family":"Ames","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wendy V.","family":"Norman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0005","series-title":"Therapeutic abortion survey. Induced abortions by province and territory of report (Hospitals and clinics)","author":"Statistics Canada.","year":"2005"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0010","series-title":"Age-specific rates of first abortions, Canada, 2005. Therapeutic abortions database, Canadian institute for health information. Custom tabulation for Norman WV","author":"Ranger","year":"2008"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.1040341","article-title":"Characteristics of women undergoing repeat induced abortion","volume":"172","author":"Fisher","year":"2005","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.12.004","article-title":"Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy","volume":"81","author":"Miller","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0025","series-title":"Abortion in women's lives","first-page":"26","author":"Boonstra","year":"2006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.003","article-title":"Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion","volume":"78","author":"Goodman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.013","article-title":"Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion","volume":"78","author":"Heikinheimo","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"820","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den465","article-title":"Can the outcome of the next pregnancy be predicted at the time of induced abortion?","volume":"24","author":"Heikinheimo","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001777.pub2","article-title":"Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices","author":"Grimes","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S55","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.12.004","article-title":"Cochrane systematic reviews of IUD trials: lessons learned","volume":"75","author":"Grimes","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.09.003","article-title":"Barriers associated with the failure to return for intrauterine device insertion following first-trimester abortion","volume":"79","author":"Stanek","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.06.018","article-title":"Immediate placement of intrauterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination","volume":"83","author":"Fox","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-128X(00)00176-8","article-title":"The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in contraception","volume":"65","author":"L\u00e4hteenm\u00e4ki","year":"2000","journal-title":"Steroids"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.04.021","article-title":"Uptake and adherence to long-acting reversible contraception post-abortion","volume":"82","author":"Rose","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0075","first-page":"CD001777","article-title":"Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices","author":"Grimes","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010","article-title":"Society of family planning clinical guidelines. Use of the Mirena LNG-IUS and Paragard CuT380A intrauterine devices in nulliparous women","volume":"81","author":"Lyus","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0085","first-page":"789","article-title":"Cost savings from emergency contraceptive pills in Canada","volume":"97","author":"Trussell","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002_bb0090","first-page":"e326","article-title":"Modelling costs and outcomes of expanded availability of emergency contraceptive use in British Columbia","volume":"14","author":"Soon","year":"2007","journal-title":"Can J Clin Pharmacol"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S001078241100206X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S001078241100206X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T17:18:25Z","timestamp":1790183905000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S001078241100206X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S001078241100206X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002","relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.3410\/f.14050956.15516056","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Preventing repeat abortion in Canada: is the immediate insertion of intrauterine devices postabortion a cost-effective option associated with fewer repeat abortions?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}