{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T05:44:16Z","timestamp":1792129456769,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,1]],"date-time":"2012-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1328054400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,1]],"date-time":"2012-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1328054400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000030","name":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000030","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100004423","name":"World Health Organization","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100004423","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000071","name":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000071","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","contraceptionjournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,17]],"date-time":"2011-08-17T16:32:46Z","timestamp":1313598766000},"page":"131-139","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":106,"title":["Pregnancy outcomes with an IUD in situ: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"85","author":[{"given":"Dalia","family":"Brahmi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria W.","family":"Steenland","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Regina-Maria","family":"Renner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mary E.","family":"Gaffield","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kathryn M.","family":"Curtis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.021","article-title":"Contraceptive failure in the United States","volume":"83","author":"Trussell","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amepre.2005.02.008","article-title":"Keeping up with evidence. A new system for WHO's evidence-based family planning guidance","volume":"28","author":"Mohllajee","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Prev Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-3797(01)00261-6","article-title":"Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process","volume":"20","author":"Harris","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Prev Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2008","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.283.15.2008","article-title":"Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group","volume":"283","author":"Stroup","year":"2000","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.07.021","article-title":"Pregnancy during the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system","volume":"190","author":"Backman","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02389602","article-title":"Pregnancy with an intrauterine device in situ and preterm delivery","volume":"252","author":"Chaim","year":"1992","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.031","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome in women with an intrauterine contraceptive device","volume":"201","author":"Ganer","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1080\/13625180500195340","article-title":"The evaluation of 318 intrauterine pregnancy cases with an intrauterine device","volume":"10","author":"Inal","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2009.133","article-title":"The prognosis of pregnancy conceived despite the presence of an intrauterine device (IUD)","volume":"38","author":"Kim","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0050","first-page":"233","article-title":"Outcome of pregnancies with an intrauterine devices and their management","volume":"81","author":"Mermet","year":"1986","journal-title":"Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(76)90675-X","article-title":"Management and outcome of pregnancies associated with the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device","volume":"126","author":"Tatum","year":"1976","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0060","first-page":"863","article-title":"The outcome of continuing pregnancies in patients with intrauterine devices. A retrospective study from the Maternity Unit of the University Hospital Center at Caen during the period 1985\u20131988","volume":"19","author":"von Theobald","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2010.545925","article-title":"Comparison of C-reactive protein levels in pregnancies with retained and removed intrauterine device","author":"Deveer","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1992.02050345.x","article-title":"Ultrasound-controlled removal of a dislocated intrauterine device in the first trimester of pregnancy: a report of 26 cases","volume":"2","author":"Kirkinen","year":"1992","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1036","article-title":"Lost intrauterine devices during pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcome after ultrasound-guided extraction. An analysis of 82 cases","volume":"23","author":"Schiesser","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.139.3.521","article-title":"Continuous sonographic monitoring of IUD extraction during pregnancy: preliminary report","volume":"139","author":"Shalev","year":"1982","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.10.008","article-title":"Term pregnancy with intraperitoneal levonorgestrel intrauterine system: a case report and review of the literature","volume":"79","author":"Hopkins","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010_bb0090","first-page":"1","article-title":"Update on overall prevalence of major birth defects \u2014 Atlanta, Georgia, 1978\u20132005","volume":"57","author":"CDC","year":"2008","journal-title":"MMWR"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782411004252?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782411004252?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,2]],"date-time":"2025-11-02T21:09:35Z","timestamp":1762117775000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782411004252"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782411004252"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Pregnancy outcomes with an IUD in situ: a systematic review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}