{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,9]],"date-time":"2025-10-09T06:21:35Z","timestamp":1759990895472},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,1,1]],"date-time":"2013-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1356998400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,8,13]],"date-time":"2012-08-13T02:45:37Z","timestamp":1344825937000},"page":"45-50","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Results of a 4-year study on 15,447 medical abortions provided by privately practicing general practitioners and gynecologists in France"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"87","author":[{"given":"Sophie","family":"Gaudu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Monique","family":"Crost","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Laurence","family":"Esterle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0005","unstructured":"Gynuity Health Projects. Mifepristone approval. http:\/\/gynuity.org\/resources\/info\/list-of-mifepristone-approval\/, updated June 2010. Accessed on September 19, 2011."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.08.004","article-title":"Mifepristone: ten years later","volume":"81","author":"Schaff","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0015","first-page":"353","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol administered at home after mifepristone (RU486) for abortion","volume":"44","author":"Schaff","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Fam Pract"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.06.005","article-title":"Acceptability of home-use of misoprostol in medical abortion","volume":"70","author":"Fiala","year":"2004","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00209.x","article-title":"Is home-based administration of prostaglandin safe and feasible for medical abortion? Results from a multisite study in Vietnam","volume":"111","author":"Ngoc","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2003.08.019","article-title":"The medical abortion experiences of married and unmarried women in Tunis, Tunisia","volume":"69","author":"Blum","year":"2004","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(03)00049-0","article-title":"Mifepristone and misoprostol for early medical abortion: 18 months experience in the United States","volume":"67","author":"Hausknecht","year":"2003","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1363\/4304111","article-title":"Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008","volume":"43","author":"Jones","year":"2011","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.08.009","article-title":"Introduction and provision of medical abortion: a tale of two countries in which technology is necessary but not sufficient","volume":"83","author":"Winikoff","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1770","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2008.136325","article-title":"Medical liability insurance as a barrier to the provision of abortion services in family practices","volume":"98","author":"Dehlendorf","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0055","first-page":"1","article-title":"Les interruptions volontaires de grossesse en 2008 et 2009","volume":"765","author":"Vilain","year":"2011","journal-title":"Etudes et r\u00e9sultats"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(96)00206-5","article-title":"Analysis of failure in medical abortion","volume":"54","author":"Winikoff","year":"1996","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(99)00078-5","article-title":"Estimating the efficacy of medical abortion","volume":"60","author":"Trussell","year":"1999","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(99)00115-8","article-title":"The efficacy of medical abortion: a meta-analysis","volume":"61","author":"Kahn","year":"2000","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2005.02.021","article-title":"Efficacit\u00e9 et acceptabilit\u00e9 de l'interruption volontaire de grossesse par m\u00e9thode m\u00e9dicamenteuse r\u00e9alis\u00e9e sans hospitalisation dans le cadre d'un r\u00e9seau ville-h\u00f4pital: \u00e9tude prospective sur 433 patientes","volume":"33","author":"Faucher","year":"2005","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.03.011","article-title":"Safety of mifepristone abortions in clinical use","volume":"72","author":"Henderson","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.11.011","article-title":"Can mifepristone medical abortion be simplified? A review of evidence and questions for future research","volume":"75","author":"Clark","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.2217\/17455057.4.2.107","article-title":"How much supervision is necessary for women taking mifepristone and misoprostol for early medical abortion?","volume":"4","author":"Shannon","year":"2008","journal-title":"Women's Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00012-5","article-title":"Verifying the effectiveness of medical abortion: ultrasound versus hCG testing","volume":"109","author":"Fiala","year":"2003","journal-title":"Europ J Obst Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.08.023","article-title":"Alternatives to ultrasound for follow-up after medication abortion: a systematic review","volume":"83","author":"Grossman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(96)00252-1","article-title":"The efficacy and tolerance of mifepristone and prostaglandin in termination of pregnancy of less than 63 days gestation: UK multicentre study \u2014 final results","volume":"55","author":"Urquhart","year":"1997","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.04.009","article-title":"Infection after medical abortion: a review of the literature","volume":"70","author":"Shannon","year":"2004","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.011","article-title":"Medical versus surgical abortion: the importance of women's choice","volume":"84","author":"Moreau","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782412006385?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782412006385?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,21]],"date-time":"2018-11-21T14:20:48Z","timestamp":1542810048000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782412006385"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,1]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782412006385"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.006","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,1]]}}}