{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T11:06:52Z","timestamp":1767006412564,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,1]],"date-time":"2013-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1377993600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,1]],"date-time":"2013-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1377993600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,1]],"date-time":"2013-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1377993600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,1]],"date-time":"2013-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1377993600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,1]],"date-time":"2013-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1377993600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,1]],"date-time":"2013-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1377993600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,1]],"date-time":"2013-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1377993600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","contraceptionjournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,12]],"date-time":"2012-11-12T04:30:35Z","timestamp":1352694635000},"page":"330-333","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Controversies in family planning: desired pregnancy, IUD in situ and no strings visible"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"88","author":[{"given":"Carter","family":"Owen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stephanie","family":"Sober","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Courtney A.","family":"Schreiber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.021","article-title":"Contraceptive failure in the United States","volume":"83","author":"Trussell","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.010","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes with an IUD in situ: a systematic review","volume":"85","author":"Brahmi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(76)90675-X","article-title":"Management and outcome of pregnancies associated with the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device","volume":"126","author":"Tatum","year":"1976","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1152","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2010.545925","article-title":"Comparison of C-reactive protein levels in pregnancies with retained and removed intrauterine device","volume":"24","author":"Deveer","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1080\/13625180500195340","article-title":"The evaluation of 318 intrauterine pregnancy cases with an intrauterine device","volume":"10","author":"Inal","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0030","first-page":"233","article-title":"Outcome of pregnancies with an intrauterine devices and their management","volume":"81","author":"Memet","year":"1986","journal-title":"Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.031","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome in women with an intrauterine contraceptive device","volume":"201","author":"Ganer","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0040","first-page":"863","article-title":"The outcome of continuing pregnancies in patients with intrauterine devices. A retrospective study from the Maternity Unit of the University Hospital Center at Caen during the period 1985\u20131988","volume":"19","author":"von Theobald","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2009.133","article-title":"The prognosis of pregnancy conceived despite the presence of an intrauterine device (IUD)","volume":"38","author":"Kim","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02389602","article-title":"Pregnancy with an intrauterine device in situ and preterm delivery","volume":"252","author":"Chaim","year":"1992","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1036","article-title":"Lost intrauterine devices during pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcome after ultrasound guided extraction. An analysis of 82 cases","volume":"23","author":"Schiesser","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1089\/gyn.1993.9.195","article-title":"Outcome of removal of intrauterine devices with flexible hysteroscopy in early pregnancy","volume":"9","author":"Lin","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(92)90105-3","article-title":"Removal of intrauterine devices with missing tails during pregnancy.","volume":"45","author":"Assaf","year":"1992","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-999306","article-title":"Removal of retained intrauterine contraceptive devices in pregnancy","volume":"9","author":"Sachs","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782412008797?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782412008797?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,25]],"date-time":"2025-10-25T22:44:50Z","timestamp":1761432290000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782412008797"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782412008797"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0010-7824"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Controversies in family planning: desired pregnancy, IUD in situ and no strings visible","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.027","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}