{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]],"date-time":"2026-05-14T06:57:18Z","timestamp":1778741838851,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,11,1]],"date-time":"2013-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1383264000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,13]],"date-time":"2013-06-13T01:33:32Z","timestamp":1371087212000},"page":"650-656","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":32,"title":["Global survey of healthcare practitioners\u2019 beliefs and practices around intrauterine contraceptive method use in nulliparous women"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"88","author":[{"given":"Kirsten I.","family":"Black","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pamela","family":"Lotke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Josefina","family":"Lira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tina","family":"Peers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nikki B.","family":"Zite","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0005","series-title":"Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research","author":"National Research Council","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0010","series-title":"Commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Long-acting reversible contraception: the effective and appropriate use of long-acting reversible contraception","author":"National Collaborating Centre for Women\u2019s and Children\u2019s Health","year":"2005"},{"issue":"21","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1998","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1110855","article-title":"Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"366","author":"Winner","year":"2012","journal-title":"N Eng J Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1338","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den091","article-title":"The cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in the UK: analysis based on a decision-analytic model developed for a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guideline","volume":"23","author":"Mavranezouli","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0025","first-page":"9","article-title":"Perpetual postponers? Women\u2019s, men\u2019s and couple\u2019s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour","volume":"117","author":"Berrington","year":"2004","journal-title":"Popul Trends"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0030","author":"World Health Organization"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmi006","article-title":"Fertility and ageing","volume":"11","author":"Baird","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1493","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000291575.93944.1a","article-title":"ACOG Committee opinion no. 392, December 2007. Intrauterine device and adolescents","volume":"110","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1434","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c6f965","article-title":"ACOG Committee opinion no. 450: increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy","volume":"114","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic P, Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working G","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1080\/13625180902741436","article-title":"Profile of long-acting reversible contraception users in Europe","volume":"14","author":"Haimovich","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1080\/13625180802511541","article-title":"Women's contraceptive practices and sexual behaviour in Europe","volume":"13","author":"Cibula","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0060","author":"United Nations"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2010.01136.x","article-title":"A study investigating obstetricians and gynaecologist management of women requesting an intrauterine device","volume":"50","author":"Black","year":"2010","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01726-4","article-title":"Obstetrician\u2013gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice","volume":"99","author":"Stanwood","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.3109\/13625187.2011.580864","article-title":"General practitioners\u2019 views on the use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in young, nulligravid women, in London, UK","volume":"16","author":"Middleton","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.05.085","article-title":"Attitudes towards long-acting reversible methods of contraception in general practice in the UK","volume":"76","author":"Wellings","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"9234","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1013","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02699-4","article-title":"Intrauterine device and upper-genital-tract infection","volume":"356","author":"Grimes","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"8796","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)91904-M","article-title":"Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective","volume":"339","author":"Farley","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"561","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa010438","article-title":"Use of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid women","volume":"345","author":"Hubacher","year":"2001","journal-title":"N Eng J Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.010","article-title":"Board of the Society of Family Planning. Use of the Mirena LNG-IUS and Paragard CuT380A intrauterine devices in nulliparous women","volume":"81","author":"Lyus","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.3109\/13625187.2011.558222","article-title":"Use of the levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system in nulliparous women\u2014a non-interventional study in Sweden","volume":"16","author":"Marions","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.012","article-title":"Ease of insertion and clinical performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in nulligravidas","volume":"84","author":"Bahamondes","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12007","article-title":"Ease of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion in family planning settings","volume":"52","author":"Harvey","year":"2012","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.01.005","article-title":"Intracervical lidocaine gel for intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"86","author":"Maguire","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq348","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device: an RCT","volume":"26","author":"Dijkhuizen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1272","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.08.022","article-title":"Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofen","volume":"195","author":"Hubacher","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782413003089?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782413003089?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,15]],"date-time":"2018-10-15T09:53:25Z","timestamp":1539597205000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782413003089"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782413003089"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.06.005","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]}}}