{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T05:13:19Z","timestamp":1791177199072,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,1]],"date-time":"2014-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1388534400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,21]],"date-time":"2013-10-21T16:43:48Z","timestamp":1382373828000},"page":"9-16","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["IUD use in France: women's and physician's perspectives"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"89","author":[{"given":"Caroline","family":"Moreau","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aline","family":"Bohet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Danielle","family":"Hassoun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Virginie","family":"Ringa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nathalie","family":"Bajos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.06.011","article-title":"Update on and correction to the cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States","volume":"85","author":"Trussell","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.07.013","article-title":"Unintended pregnancies in the Unites States: incidence and disparities, 2006","volume":"84","author":"Finer","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg215","article-title":"Contraception: from accessibility to efficiency","volume":"18","author":"Bajos","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31828ac03a","article-title":"Pitfalls of research linking the intrauterine device to pelvic inflammatory disease","volume":"12","author":"Hubacher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S55","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.12.004","article-title":"Cochrane systematic reviews of IUD trials: lessons learned","volume":"75","author":"Grimes","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.08.007","article-title":"Does insertion and use of an intrauterine device increase the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease among women with sexually transmitted infection? a systematic review","volume":"73","author":"Mohllajeea","year":"2006","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1314","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318273364c","article-title":"Neisseria gonorrhea and chlamydia trachomatis screening at intrauterine device insertion and pelvic inflammatory disease","volume":"120","author":"Sufrin","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.12.005","article-title":"Copper intrauterine device use by nulliparous women: review of side effects","volume":"75","author":"Hubacher","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.001","article-title":"Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project","volume":"84","author":"Mestad","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31828b63a0","article-title":"Complications and continuation of intrauterine device use among commercially insured teenagers","volume":"121","author":"Berenson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1434","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c6f965","article-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion no. 450: Increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy","volume":"114","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1338","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den091","article-title":"The cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in the UK: analysis based on a decision-analytic model developed for a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guideline.","volume":"23","author":"Mavranezouli","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.05.085","article-title":"Attitudes towards long-acting reversible methods of contraception in general practice in the UK","volume":"76","author":"Wellings","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0070","first-page":"637","article-title":"Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and Obstertics and gynecolgists","volume":"44","author":"Harper","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fam Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0160","author":"United Nations"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0165","first-page":"1","article-title":"Contraception in France : new context, new practices? 2012","volume":"492","author":"Bajos","year":"2012","journal-title":"Population et Societes"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.04.002","article-title":"Trends and determinants of use of long-acting reversible contraception use among young women in France: results from three national surveys conducted between 2000 and 2010","volume":"100","author":"Moreau","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil & Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0175","author":"ANAES"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0180","author":"Observatoire Nationale de la Demographie des Porfessions de Sante"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.09.013","article-title":"Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth","volume":"77","author":"Kost","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2422","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem184","article-title":"Contraceptive failure rates in France: results from a population-based survey","volume":"22","author":"Moreau","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0185","author":"Aubin"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1783\/147118908786000497","article-title":"Attitudes of women in Scotland to contraception: a qualitative study to explore the acceptability of long-acting methods","volume":"34","author":"Glasier","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.017","article-title":"The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"203","author":"Secura","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.06.001","article-title":"The potential of long-acting reversible contraception to decrease unintended pregnancy","volume":"78","author":"Speidel","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kavanaugh ML, Frohwirth L, Jerman J, Popkin R, Ethier K. Long-acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents and Young Adults:Patient and Provider Perspectives, J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 26 (2013) 86e95.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpag.2012.10.006"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1177\/0163278707307899","article-title":"Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians","volume":"30","author":"VanGeest","year":"2007","journal-title":"Evaluation Health Professions"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-3797(00)00258-0","article-title":"Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature.","volume":"20","author":"Kellerman","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Prev Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003_bb0145","unstructured":"Legleye S, Bohet A, Razafindratsima N, Bajos N, Moreau C. A randomized trial of survey participation among a national random sample of GPs and gynecologists in France. RESP, in press."}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782413006434?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782413006434?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,12]],"date-time":"2018-10-12T00:21:54Z","timestamp":1539303714000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782413006434"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,1]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782413006434"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,1]]}}}