{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,22]],"date-time":"2026-01-22T09:00:26Z","timestamp":1769072426717,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,1]],"date-time":"2014-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1388534400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,22]],"date-time":"2013-10-22T08:17:00Z","timestamp":1382429820000},"page":"57-62","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Variation in postpartum contraceptive method use: results from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS)"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"89","author":[{"given":"Kari","family":"White","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joseph E.","family":"Potter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kristine","family":"Hopkins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Grossman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1363\/3809006","article-title":"Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001","volume":"38","author":"Finer","year":"2006","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.07.013","article-title":"Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006","volume":"84","author":"Finer","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0015","series-title":"Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006\u20132010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995","author":"Jones","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.021","article-title":"Contraceptive failure in the United States","volume":"83","author":"Trussell","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"893","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.06.027","article-title":"Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the U.S., 2007\u20132009","volume":"98","author":"Finer","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0030","unstructured":"Guttmacher Institute. Medicaid family planning eligibility expansions.New York: Guttmacher Institute. April 1 2013."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0035","unstructured":"Kaiser Family Foundation, The George Washington University Medical Center School of Public Health and Health Services. State medicaid coverage of family planning services: Summary of state findings; Menlo Park: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation 2009. Available from: http:\/\/kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com\/2013\/01\/8015.pdf. Accessed May 2013."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"703","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1728-4457.1999.00703.x","article-title":"The persistence of outmoded contraceptive regimes: the cases of Mexico and Brazil","volume":"25","author":"Potter","year":"1999","journal-title":"Popul Dev Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6060(98)70017-0","article-title":"Variation profiles of common surgical procedures","volume":"124","author":"Birkmeyer","year":"1998","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1102","DOI":"10.1126\/science.182.4117.1102","article-title":"Small area variations in health care delivery","volume":"182","author":"Wennberg","year":"1973","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.017","article-title":"The contraceptive CHOICE project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"203","author":"Secura","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0060","first-page":"1","article-title":"Vital signs: Repeat births among teens \u2014 United States, 2007\u20132010","volume":"62","author":"Gavin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Morb Mortal Wkly Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0065","unstructured":"Philliber Research Associates, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health. Evaluating the Colorado initiative to reduce unintended pregnancies. New York: Philliber Research Associates 2010; Available from: http:\/\/bixbycenter.ucsf.edu\/publications\/files\/Brief_2_Colorado%28Feb2010%29.pdf. Accessed August 2013."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.11.005","article-title":"Lack of insurance and parity influence choice between long-acting reversible contraception and sterilization in women postpregnancy","volume":"86","author":"Baldwin","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.08.004","article-title":"Postpartum intrauterine device insertion and postpartum tubal sterilization in the United States","volume":"206","author":"Whiteman","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1363\/4307811","article-title":"Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level","volume":"43","author":"Finer","year":"2011","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1363\/4405712","article-title":"Explaining variation in state unintended pregnancy rates in the United States","volume":"44","author":"Kost","year":"2012","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jadohealth.2012.05.004","article-title":"Postpartum contraceptive use among adolescent mothers in seven states","volume":"52","author":"Wilson","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Adolesc Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000249604.78234.d3","article-title":"Race, insurance status, and tubal sterilization","volume":"109","author":"Borrero","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.03.029","article-title":"Tubal sterilization trends in the US","volume":"94","author":"Chan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0105","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Reproductive Health. PRAMS methodology: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012; Available from: http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/prams\/Methodology.htm, Accessed April 2013."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1363\/3813906","article-title":"Provision of contraceptive and related services by publicly funded family planning clinics, 2003","volume":"38","author":"Lindberg","year":"2006","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0115","series-title":"Health centers and family planning: results from a nationwide survey","author":"Wood","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2011.04.010","article-title":"Increased use of intrauterine contraception in California, 1997 to 2007","volume":"21","author":"Thompson","year":"2011","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005_bb0125","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: Final data for 2009","volume":"60","author":"Martin","year":"2011","journal-title":"Natl vital Stat Rep"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782413006458?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782413006458?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,11]],"date-time":"2018-10-11T22:57:02Z","timestamp":1539298622000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782413006458"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,1]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782413006458"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.005","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,1]]}}}