{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,22]],"date-time":"2026-02-22T04:42:43Z","timestamp":1771735363354,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,1]],"date-time":"2015-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1430438400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,1,29]],"date-time":"2015-01-29T01:34:24Z","timestamp":1422495264000},"page":"398-402","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Effect of previous induced abortions on postabortion contraception selection"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"91","author":[{"given":"Melissa","family":"Keene","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alicia","family":"Roston","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Louis","family":"Keith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ashlesha","family":"Patel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0005","series-title":"Occasional report no. 29","article-title":"Repeat abortion in the United States","author":"Jones","year":"2006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.003","article-title":"Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion","volume":"78","author":"Goodman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.049","article-title":"Communicating contraceptive effectiveness: an updated counseling chart","volume":"197","author":"Steiner","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0020","series-title":"Family planning: a global handbook for providers","author":"World Health Organization\/Department of Reproductive Health Research","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0025","series-title":"Contraceptive technology, nineteenth revised edition","article-title":"Choosing a contraceptive: efficacy, safety, and personal considerations","author":"Trussell","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1286","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000265336.14160.cc","article-title":"Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis","volume":"109","author":"Reeves","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.009","article-title":"Patients' attitudes and experiences related to receiving contraception during abortion care","volume":"84","author":"Kavanaugh","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0040","article-title":"Findings and prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae at an urban public health system","volume":"2014","author":"Roston","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J STD AIDS"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0045","series-title":"Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2012","author":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.017","article-title":"The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"203","author":"Secura","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.013","article-title":"Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion","volume":"78","author":"Heikinheimo","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-3797(01)00316-6","article-title":"A village would be nice but\u2026it takes a long-acting contraceptive to prevent repeat adolescent pregnancies","volume":"21","author":"Stevens-Simon","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Prev Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0065","author":"Consent for Sterilization"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318262e354","article-title":"Committee opinion no. 530: access to postpartum sterilization","volume":"120","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.05.140","article-title":"Immediate postabortion IUD placement for women with unknown STI status in a high-risk population: what's the dilemma?","volume":"88","author":"Patel","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.09.003","article-title":"Barriers associated with the failure to return for intrauterine device insertion following first-trimester abortion","volume":"79","author":"Stanek","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)44893-4","article-title":"A comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of the Copper-7 intrauterine device following immediate or delayed insertion after first-trimester therapeutic abortion","volume":"34","author":"Gillett","year":"1980","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.05.009","article-title":"One-year continuation of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant in women with postabortion or interval placement","volume":"88","author":"Mark","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1053","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182632cd6","article-title":"Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement","volume":"120","author":"Madden","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.06.008","article-title":"Contraceptive policies affect post-abortion provision of long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"83","author":"Thompson","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782415000360?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782415000360?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,29]],"date-time":"2020-08-29T12:20:03Z","timestamp":1598703603000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782415000360"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782415000360"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Effect of previous induced abortions on postabortion contraception selection","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.10.011","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}