{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,11]],"date-time":"2026-02-11T02:56:23Z","timestamp":1770778583818,"version":"3.50.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,1]],"date-time":"2015-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1425168000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,11,17]],"date-time":"2014-11-17T16:24:22Z","timestamp":1416241462000},"page":"185-192","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["Rationale and enrollment results for a partially randomized patient preference trial to compare continuation rates of short-acting and long-acting reversible contraception"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"91","author":[{"given":"David","family":"Hubacher","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hannah","family":"Spector","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Charles","family":"Monteith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pai-Lien","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Catherine","family":"Hart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0005","series-title":"Contraceptive Technology","first-page":"779","article-title":"Contraceptive efficacy","author":"Trussell","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0010","series-title":"Family planning handbook: a global handbook for providers","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0015","first-page":"1","article-title":"Use of contraception in the United States: 1982\u20132008","volume":"23","author":"Mosher","year":"2010","journal-title":"Vital Health Stat"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.031","article-title":"A randomized trial of the intrauterine contraceptive device vs hormonal contraception in women who are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus","volume":"197","author":"Stringer","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.03.006","article-title":"Randomized assignment to copper IUD or depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate: feasibility of enrollment, continuation and disease ascertainment","volume":"72","author":"Feldblum","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"a1864","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.a1864","article-title":"Patients' preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis","volume":"337","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1105","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821188ad","article-title":"Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception","volume":"117","author":"Peipert","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1083","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a91f45","article-title":"Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraception","volume":"122","author":"O'Neil-Callahan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.299.6694.313","article-title":"Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials","volume":"299","author":"Brewin","year":"1989","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1332","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10999.x","article-title":"Partially randomised patient preference trials","volume":"104","author":"Brocklehurst","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1367","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11005.x","article-title":"The impact of using a partially randomised patient preference design when evaluating alternative managements for heavy menstrual bleeding","volume":"104","author":"Cooper","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"772","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7289.772","article-title":"Antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treatment of major depression in primary care: randomised trial with patient preference arms","volume":"322","author":"Chilvers","year":"2001","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c869","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c869","article-title":"CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials","volume":"340","author":"Moher","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.11.015","article-title":"Changes in out-of-pocket payments for contraception by privately insured women during implementation of the federal contraceptive coverage requirement","volume":"89","author":"Finer","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0075","first-page":"39869","article-title":"Coverage of certain preventive services under the Affordable Care Act. Final rules","volume":"78","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fed Regist"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.03.012","article-title":"The effect of nitroglycerin on the IUD insertion experience in nulliparous women: a pilot study","volume":"90","author":"Micks","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.11.018","article-title":"Misoprostol for intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"210","author":"Espey","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0090","first-page":"CD007373","article-title":"Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion","author":"Allen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.07.009","article-title":"Higher dose cervical 2% lidocaine gel for IUD insertion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"88","author":"Allen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3S","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000209","article-title":"Intrauterine devices and the risk of uterine perforations: final results from the EURAS-IUD study","volume":"123","author":"Heinemann","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1363\/46e2014","article-title":"The relationship between contraceptive features preferred by young women and interest in IUDs: an exploratory analysis","volume":"46","author":"Gomez","year":"2014","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0110","first-page":"637","article-title":"Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists","volume":"44","author":"Harper","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fam Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.09.014","article-title":"Accessibility of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)","volume":"89","author":"Beeson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.05.012","article-title":"Same-day LARC insertion attitudes and practices","volume":"88","author":"Biggs","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.06.018","article-title":"Immediate placement of intrauterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination","volume":"83","author":"Fox","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"522","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.10.005","article-title":"Immediate vs. delayed post-abortal copper T 380A IUD insertion in cases over 12weeks of gestation","volume":"83","author":"Cremer","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1338","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den091","article-title":"The cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in the UK: analysis based on a decision-analytic model developed for a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guideline","volume":"23","author":"Mavranezouli","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e265","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2013.05.004","article-title":"Cost-savings from the provision of specific contraceptive methods in 2009","volume":"23","author":"Foster","year":"2013","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.07.016","article-title":"Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"87","author":"Trussell","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1291","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318273eb56","article-title":"Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception","volume":"120","author":"Peipert","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1998","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1110855","article-title":"Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"366","author":"Winner","year":"2012","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1363\/46e1714","article-title":"Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women","volume":"46","author":"Ricketts","year":"2014","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006_bb0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S43","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2013.301416","article-title":"Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001\u20132008","volume":"104","author":"Finer","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S001078241400777X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S001078241400777X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,27]],"date-time":"2018-09-27T18:50:48Z","timestamp":1538074248000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S001078241400777X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S001078241400777X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Rationale and enrollment results for a partially randomized patient preference trial to compare continuation rates of short-acting and long-acting reversible contraception","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}