{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,8]],"date-time":"2026-04-08T01:39:03Z","timestamp":1775612343697,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,1]],"date-time":"2015-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1425168000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,12]],"date-time":"2014-12-12T03:50:27Z","timestamp":1418356227000},"page":"198-203","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":43,"title":["Intracesarean insertion of the Copper T380A versus 6 weeks postcesarean: a randomized clinical trial"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"91","author":[{"given":"Felicia","family":"Lester","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Othman","family":"Kakaire","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Josaphat","family":"Byamugisha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sarah","family":"Averbach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jennifer","family":"Fortin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2528-0144","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rie","family":"Maurer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alisa","family":"Goldberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.03.009","article-title":"Contraceptive failure in the United States","volume":"70","author":"Trussell","year":"2004","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.05.016","article-title":"Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women","volume":"72","author":"Ogburn","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1255","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.321.7271.1255","article-title":"Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study","volume":"321","author":"Conde-Agudelo","year":"2000","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000171118.79529.a3","article-title":"Effect of the interpregnancy interval on perinatal outcomes in Latin America","volume":"106","author":"Conde-Agudelo","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"15","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1809","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.295.15.1809","article-title":"Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis","volume":"295","author":"Conde-Agudelo","year":"2006","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1075","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000286759.49895.46","article-title":"Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"110","author":"Stamilio","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f73fac","article-title":"Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"116","author":"Chen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.03.024","article-title":"Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review","volume":"80","author":"Kapp","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01849224","article-title":"IUD insertion at cesarean section \u2014 the Chinese experience","volume":"2","author":"Chi","year":"1986","journal-title":"Adv Contracept"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01849309","article-title":"IUD insertion during cesarean section","volume":"1","author":"Van Kets","year":"1985","journal-title":"Adv Contracept"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02042586","article-title":"Immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion \u2014 a report on the Chinese experience","volume":"8","author":"Xu","year":"1992","journal-title":"Adv Contracept"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(91)90820-U","article-title":"Immediate postpartum IUD insertions in a Chinese hospital \u2014 a two year follow-up","volume":"35","author":"Zhou","year":"1991","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.11.019","article-title":"Immediate postplacental IUD insertion at cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study","volume":"86","author":"Levi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.2307\/1964827","article-title":"Family planning in the immediate postpartum period","volume":"4","author":"Echeverry","year":"1973","journal-title":"Stud Fam Plann"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c332","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c332","article-title":"CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials","volume":"340","author":"Schulz","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.01.014","article-title":"Intraoperative placement of the Copper T-380 intrauterine device in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery: a pilot study","volume":"80","author":"Nelson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0085","series-title":"Uganda Demographic Health Survey 2011","author":"Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and MEASURE DHS, ICF International","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0090","series-title":"Brief","article-title":"Benefits of meeting the contraceptive needs of Ugandan women","author":"Vlassoff","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0095","first-page":"CD008896","article-title":"Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device","volume":"3","author":"Arrowsmith","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002_bb0100","first-page":"1","article-title":"Barriers to intrauterine device uptake in a rural setting in Ghana","volume":"25","author":"Robinson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Health Care Women Int"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782414007896?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782414007896?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,26]],"date-time":"2018-09-26T22:22:16Z","timestamp":1538000536000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782414007896"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782414007896"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Intracesarean insertion of the Copper T380A versus 6 weeks postcesarean: a randomized clinical trial","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.12.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}