{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T22:14:24Z","timestamp":1789596864296,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,1]],"date-time":"2015-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1441065600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,24]],"date-time":"2015-04-24T19:46:01Z","timestamp":1429904761000},"page":"212-214","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":41,"title":["Early medical abortion without prior ultrasound"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"92","author":[{"given":"Elizabeth G.","family":"Raymond","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hillary","family":"Bracken","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"480","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.07.004","article-title":"The accuracy of using last menstrual period to determine gestational age for first trimester medication abortion: a systematic review","volume":"90","author":"Schonberg","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02753.x","article-title":"Alternatives to routine ultrasound for eligibility assessment prior to early termination of pregnancy with mifepristone-misoprostol","volume":"118","author":"Bracken","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00014.x","article-title":"Routine ultrasound for pregnancy termination requests increases women's choice and reduces inappropriate treatments","volume":"111","author":"McGalliard","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.018","article-title":"A two-pill sublingual misoprostol outpatient regimen following mifepristone for medical abortion through 70days' LMP: a prospective comparative open-label trial","volume":"89","author":"Bracken","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1070","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31826c315f","article-title":"Extending outpatient medical abortion services through 70days of gestational age","volume":"120","author":"Winikoff","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/S0968-8080(15)43825-X","article-title":"Safety, efficacy and acceptability of outpatient mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion through 70days since last menstrual period in public sector facilities in Mexico City","volume":"22","author":"Sanhueza Smith","year":"2015","journal-title":"Reprod Health Matters"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008_bb0035","series-title":"Clinical Policy Guidelines","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(01)00300-6","article-title":"Could American women use mifepristone-misoprostol pills safely with less medical supervision?","volume":"65","author":"Harper","year":"2002","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/3.1.25","article-title":"Morphological and molecular characteristics of living human fetuses between Carnegie stages 7 and 23: ultrasound scanning and direct measurements","volume":"3","author":"Harkness","year":"1997","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01293.x","article-title":"A comparison of women's, providers' and ultrasound assessments of pregnancy duration among termination of pregnancy clients in South Africa","volume":"114","author":"Blanchard","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"877","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(99)10170-3","article-title":"Accuracy of assessment of pregnancy duration by women seeking early abortions","volume":"355","author":"Ellertson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.01.005","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of medical abortion using mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 63days","volume":"91","author":"Gatter","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.07.038","article-title":"Use of telemedicine for providing medical abortion","volume":"124","author":"Wiebe","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782415001717?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782415001717?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]],"date-time":"2020-09-01T09:08:00Z","timestamp":1598951280000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782415001717"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782415001717"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Early medical abortion without prior ultrasound","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.04.008","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}