{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,10]],"date-time":"2026-01-10T01:33:23Z","timestamp":1768008803346,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,1]],"date-time":"2015-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1448928000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,23]],"date-time":"2015-10-23T01:19:54Z","timestamp":1445563194000},"page":"523-531","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":63,"title":["Characterization of Medicaid policy for immediate postpartum contraception"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"92","author":[{"given":"Michelle H.","family":"Moniz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vanessa K.","family":"Dalton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Matthew M.","family":"Davis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jane","family":"Forman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bradley","family":"Iott","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jessica","family":"Landgraf","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tammy","family":"Chang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1809","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.295.15.1809","article-title":"Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta analysis","volume":"295","author":"Conde-Agudelo","year":"2006","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1016\/S1083-3188(98)70130-5","article-title":"Risk factors for rapid repeat pregnancy among adolescent mothers: a review of the literature","volume":"11","author":"Rigsby","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182955e58","article-title":"Short interpregnancy intervals in the United States","volume":"122","author":"Gemmill","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318227f05e","article-title":"Long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Practice Bulletin No. 121","volume":"118","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2003.12.004","article-title":"Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices","volume":"69","author":"Celen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24.e1-7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.015","article-title":"Preventing repeat pregnancy in adolescents: is immediate postpartum insertion of the contraceptive implant cost effective?","volume":"211","author":"Han","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpag.2011.09.003","article-title":"Long acting reversible contraception in postpartum adolescents: early initiation of etonogestrel implant is superior to IUDs in the outpatient setting","volume":"25","author":"Tocce","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481.e1-7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.04.015","article-title":"Rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: do immediate postpartum contraceptive implants make a difference?","volume":"206","author":"Tocce","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.02.010","article-title":"Etonogestrel implant in postpartum adolescents: bleeding pattern, efficacy and discontinuation rate","volume":"82","author":"Guazzelli","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.07.001","article-title":"Advocating for immediate postpartum LARC: increasing access, improving outcomes, and decreasing cost","volume":"90","author":"Rodriguez","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.06.039","article-title":"Unmet demand for highly effective postpartum contraception in Texas","volume":"90","author":"Potter","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.05.016","article-title":"Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women","volume":"72","author":"Ogburn","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.05.011","article-title":"A missed opportunity for care: two-visit IUD insertion protocols inhibit placement","volume":"86","author":"Bergin","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"RR-4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0165","first-page":"1","article-title":"U S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010.","volume":"59","author":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)","year":"2010","journal-title":"MMWR Recomm Rep"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.08.005","article-title":"Global fee prohibits postpartum provision of the most effective reversible contraceptives","volume":"90","author":"Aiken","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0175","series-title":"Learning from strangers: the art and method of qualitative interview studies","first-page":"ix","author":"Weiss","year":"1994"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0090","series-title":"Empirical Research for Bioethics: A Primer","article-title":"Qualitative content analysis","author":"Forman","year":"2007"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1114","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182165ee8","article-title":"Lactogenesis after early postpartum use of the contraceptive implant: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"117","author":"Gurtcheff","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.05.124","article-title":"Safety of the etonogestrel-releasing implant during the immediate postpartum period: a pilot study","volume":"80","author":"Brito","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f73fac","article-title":"Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"116","author":"Chen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.03.024","article-title":"Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review","volume":"80","author":"Kapp","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0180","series-title":"Committee Opinion No. 505","first-page":"754","article-title":"Understanding and using the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010","volume":"118","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0190","author":"Association of State and Territorial Health Officials"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.11.002","article-title":"Cost-benefit analysis of state- and hospital-funded postpartum intrauterine contraception at a university hospital for recent immigrants to the United States","volume":"81","author":"Rodriguez","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0195","author":"Health Management Associates"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0200","author":"Thomas"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014_bb0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1363\/4309411","article-title":"The public costs of births resulting from unintended pregnancies: national and state-level estimates","volume":"43","author":"Sonfield","year":"2011","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782415006046?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782415006046?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,18]],"date-time":"2018-09-18T13:27:03Z","timestamp":1537277223000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782415006046"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782415006046"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Characterization of Medicaid policy for immediate postpartum contraception","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}