{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,14]],"date-time":"2026-02-14T10:59:03Z","timestamp":1771066743527,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,1]],"date-time":"2016-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1470009600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,6]],"date-time":"2016-04-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1459900800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,10]],"date-time":"2016-04-10T04:10:17Z","timestamp":1460261417000},"page":"115-121","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Randomized trial assessing home use of two pregnancy tests for determining early medical abortion outcomes at 3, 7 and 14days after mifepristone"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"94","author":[{"given":"Jennifer","family":"Blum","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wendy R.","family":"Sheldon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nguyen Thi Nhu","family":"Ngoc","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Beverly","family":"Winikoff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nguyen Thi Bach","family":"Nga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Roxanne","family":"Martin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Le","family":"Van Thanh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paul D.","family":"Blumenthal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.11.011","article-title":"Can mifepristone medical abortion be simplified? A review of the evidence and questions for future research","volume":"75","author":"Clark","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"738","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000115511.14004.19","article-title":"Routine follow-up visits after first-trimester induced abortion","volume":"103","author":"Grossman","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c996f3","article-title":"Alternatives to a routine follow-up visit for early medical abortion","volume":"115","author":"Clark","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.08.023","article-title":"Alternatives to ultrasound for follow-up after medication abortion: a systematic review","volume":"83","author":"Grossman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.08.001","article-title":"Medication abortion employing routine sequential measurements of serum hCG and sonography on when indicated","volume":"75","author":"Clark","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00012-5","article-title":"Verifying the effectiveness of medical abortion: ultrasound versus hCG testing","volume":"109","author":"Fiala","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.08.008","article-title":"Feasibility of telephone follow-up after medical abortion","volume":"81","author":"Perriera","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0040","first-page":"504","article-title":"Effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion provided through telemedicine","volume":"86","author":"Grossman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.11.010","article-title":"Telephone follow-up and self-performed urine pregnancy testing after early medical abortion: a service evaluation","volume":"86","author":"Cameron","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.03.016","article-title":"RU OK? The acceptability and feasibility of remote technologies for follow-up after early medical abortion","volume":"90","author":"Bracken","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.04.009","article-title":"Mobile phone messages to provide support to women during the home phase of medical abortion in South Africa: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"90","author":"Constant","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.01.010","article-title":"Simplified follow-up after early medical abortion: 12-month experience of a telephone call and self-performed low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test","volume":"89","author":"Michie","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.04.008","article-title":"Accuracy of a semi-quantitative urine pregnancy test compared to serum beta-hCG measurement: a possible screening tool for ongoing pregnancy after medical abortion","volume":"76","author":"Grossman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.01.021","article-title":"Clinical utility of urine pregnancy assays to determine medical abortion outcome is limited","volume":"75","author":"Godfrey","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.005","article-title":"Can at-home semi-quantitative pregnancy tests serve as a replacement for clinical follow-up of medical abortion: a United States study","volume":"86","author":"Blum","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2012.11.022","article-title":"Simplified medical abortion using a semi-quantitative pregnancy test for home-based follow-up","volume":"121","author":"Lynd","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000050","article-title":"Acceptability and feasibility of phone follow-up after early medical abortion in Vietnam: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Ngoc","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.004","article-title":"Acceptability and feasibility of phone follow-up with a semiquantitative urine pregnancy test after medical abortion in Moldova and Uzbekistan","volume":"91","author":"Platais","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2315","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.9.2315","article-title":"The kinetics of serum hCG and progesterone in response to oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol during medical termination of early pregnancy","volume":"17","author":"Honkanen","year":"2002","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"776","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70463-5","article-title":"Change in serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin after abortion with methotrexate and misoprostol","volume":"174","author":"Creinin","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2012.03.039","article-title":"Comparison of misoprostol-only and combined mifepristone-misoprostol regimens for home-based early medical abortion in Tunisia and Vietnam","volume":"118","author":"Blum","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318227214e","article-title":"Comparing two early medical abortion regimens: mifepristone+misoprostol vs. misoprostol alone","volume":"118","author":"Ngoc","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00209.x","article-title":"Is home-based administration of prostaglandin safe and feasible for medical abortion? Results from a multisite study in Vietnam","volume":"111","author":"Ngoc","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1063","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d9d421","article-title":"CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials","volume":"115","author":"Schulz","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9969","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61054-0","article-title":"Clinical follow-up compared with self-assessment of outcome after medical abortion: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"Oppegaard","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001_bb0130","series-title":"WHO recommendations: optimizing health worker roles to improve access to key maternal and newborn health interventions through task shifting","year":"2014"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782415301670?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782415301670?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,13]],"date-time":"2018-09-13T13:52:00Z","timestamp":1536846720000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782415301670"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782415301670"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Randomized trial assessing home use of two pregnancy tests for determining early medical abortion outcomes at 3, 7 and 14days after mifepristone","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}