{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,11]],"date-time":"2026-02-11T13:11:48Z","timestamp":1770815508853,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,1]],"date-time":"2016-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1470009600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,21]],"date-time":"2016-04-21T07:09:38Z","timestamp":1461222578000},"page":"122-126","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["Comparing office and telephone follow-up after medical abortion"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"94","author":[{"given":"Melissa J.","family":"Chen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kacie M.","family":"Rounds","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mitchell D.","family":"Creinin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Catherine","family":"Cansino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Melody Y.","family":"Hou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000444454.67279.7d","article-title":"Practice bulletin no.143: medical management of first-trimester abortion","volume":"123","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gymecologists","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.01.016","volume":"89","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.09.007","article-title":"Comparison of medical abortion follow-up with serum human chorionic gonadotropin testing and in-office assessment","volume":"85","author":"Horning","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.08.023","article-title":"Alternatives to ultrasound for follow-up after medication abortion: a systematic review","volume":"83","author":"Grossman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.08.008","article-title":"Feasibility of telephone follow-up after medical abortion","volume":"81","author":"Perriera","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2013.782276","article-title":"Women's satisfaction with early home medical abortion with telephone follow-up: a questionnaire-based study in the U.K","volume":"33","author":"McKay","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.11.010","article-title":"Telephone follow-up and self-performed urine pregnancy testing after early medical abortion: a service evaluation","volume":"86","author":"Cameron","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.01.010","article-title":"Simplified follow-up after early medical abortion: 12-month experience of a telephone call and self-performed low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test","volume":"89","author":"Michie","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000050","article-title":"Acceptability and feasibility of phone follow-up after early medical abortion in Vietnam: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Ngoc","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.004","article-title":"Acceptability and feasibility of phone follow-up with a semiquantitative urine pregnancy test after medical abortion in Moldova and Uzbekistan","volume":"91","author":"Platais","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.01.015","article-title":"LARC utilization based on type of medical abortion follow-up at an academic center","volume":"91","author":"Rooney","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701203632","article-title":"Risk factors for unsuccessful medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol","volume":"86","author":"Haimov-Kochman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.09.009","article-title":"Can women determine the success of early medical termination of pregnancy themselves?","volume":"91","author":"Cameron","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61054-0","article-title":"Clinical follow-up compared with self-assessment of outcome after medical abortion: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"Oppegaard","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.04.005","article-title":"Ability of the clinician and patient to predict the outcome of mifepristone and misoprostol medical abortion","volume":"70","author":"Rossi","year":"2004","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000897","article-title":"Mifepristone with buccal misoprostol for medical abortion: a systematic review","volume":"126","author":"Chen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782416300324?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782416300324?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,13]],"date-time":"2018-09-13T06:51:20Z","timestamp":1536821480000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782416300324"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782416300324"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparing office and telephone follow-up after medical abortion","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}