{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]],"date-time":"2026-05-14T06:57:22Z","timestamp":1778741842575,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,1]],"date-time":"2016-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1480550400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,29]],"date-time":"2016-06-29T07:57:00Z","timestamp":1467187020000},"page":"739-759","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":39,"title":["Medications to ease intrauterine device insertion: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"94","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6536-7124","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lauren B.","family":"Zapata","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tara C.","family":"Jatlaoui","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Polly A.","family":"Marchbanks","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kathryn M.","family":"Curtis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.021","article-title":"Contraceptive failure in the United States","volume":"83","author":"Trussell","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0010","first-page":"1","article-title":"U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010","volume":"59","author":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","year":"2010","journal-title":"MMWR Recomm Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0015","first-page":"1","article-title":"Trends in long-acting reversible contraception use among U.S. women aged 15\u201344","author":"Branum","year":"2015","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0020","first-page":"1","article-title":"Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15\u201344: United States, 2011\u20132013","author":"Daniels","year":"2015","journal-title":"Natl Health Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0025","first-page":"363","article-title":"Vital signs: trends in use of long-acting reversible contraception among teens aged 15\u201319years seeking contraceptive services \u2014 United States, 2005\u20132013","volume":"64","author":"Romero","year":"2015","journal-title":"MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2015.03.011","article-title":"Do knowledge and attitudes regarding intrauterine devices predict interest in their use?","volume":"25","author":"Gomez","year":"2015","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.006","article-title":"Rationale and enrollment results for a partially randomized patient preference trial to compare continuation rates of short-acting and long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"91","author":"Hubacher","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.01.011","article-title":"Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City","volume":"89","author":"Potter","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.10.020","article-title":"Understanding the barriers and myths limiting the use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women: results of a survey of European\/Canadian healthcare providers","volume":"183","author":"Buhling","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"515.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.049","article-title":"Insertion characteristics of intrauterine devices in adolescents and young women: success, ancillary measures, and complications","volume":"213","author":"Teal","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.012","article-title":"Ease of insertion and clinical performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in nulligravidas","volume":"84","author":"Bahamondes","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2012-100383","article-title":"Intrauterine device insertions: which variables matter?","volume":"40","author":"Brown","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1272","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.08.022","article-title":"Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofen","volume":"195","author":"Hubacher","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.01.005","article-title":"Intracervical lidocaine gel for intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"86","author":"Maguire","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0075","first-page":"CD007373","article-title":"Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion","volume":"7","author":"Lopez","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmt022","article-title":"Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives","volume":"19","author":"Gemzell-Danielsson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0085","first-page":"Cd006034","article-title":"Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy bleeding or pain associated with intrauterine device use","author":"Grimes","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.3109\/13625187.2014.903238","article-title":"Analgesic options for placement of an intrauterine contraceptive: a meta-analysis","volume":"19","author":"Pergialiotis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1363\/46e0814","article-title":"Counseling about IUDs: a mixed-methods analysis","volume":"46","author":"Dehlendorf","year":"2014","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0100","first-page":"1","article-title":"U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2013: adapted from the World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use","volume":"62","author":"Centers for Diseaes Control and Prevention","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"b2535","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b2535","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"339","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-3797(01)00261-6","article-title":"Current methods of the US preventive services task force: a review of the process","volume":"20","author":"Harris","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Prev Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev137","article-title":"Effect of vaginal administration of misoprostol before intrauterine contraceptive insertion following previous insertion failure: a double blind RCT","author":"Bahamondes","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq348","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device: an RCT","volume":"26","author":"Dijkhuizen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.016","article-title":"Effects of prophylactic misoprostol administration prior to intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women","volume":"84","author":"Edelman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.11.018","article-title":"Misoprostol for intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"210","author":"Espey","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.020","article-title":"Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study on the effect of misoprostol on ease of consecutive insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system","volume":"81","author":"Heikinheimo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.3109\/13625187.2013.800855","article-title":"Sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of a T380A intrauterine device in women with no previous vaginal delivery","volume":"18","author":"Ibrahim","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.07.011","article-title":"Self-administration of misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion among nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"88","author":"Lathrop","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0150","first-page":"62","article-title":"Inserting intrauterine devices in nulliparous women: is misoprostol beneficial? A registered clinical trial","volume":"1","author":"Lotke","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2118","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det240","article-title":"Misoprostol prior to inserting an intrauterine device in nulligravidas: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"28","author":"Scavuzzi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31825d9ec9","article-title":"Self-administered misoprostol or placebo before intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"120","author":"Swenson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.07.009","article-title":"Higher dose cervical 2% lidocaine gel for IUD insertion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"88","author":"Allen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.10.030","article-title":"The effect of nitroprusside on IUD insertion experience in nulliparous women: a pilot study","volume":"87","author":"Bednarek","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2439","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu233","article-title":"Effect of intracervical anesthesia on pain associated with the insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women without previous vaginal delivery: a RCT","volume":"29","author":"Castro","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.03.012","article-title":"The effect of nitroglycerin on the IUD insertion experience in nulliparous women: a pilot study","volume":"90","author":"Micks","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.02.001","article-title":"Diclofenac plus lidocaine gel for pain relief during intrauterine device insertion. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study","volume":"93","author":"Fouda","year":"2016","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0190","first-page":"255","article-title":"Inhaled lavender effect on anxiety and pain caused from intrauterine device insertion","volume":"1","author":"Shahnazi","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Caring Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2012-100422","article-title":"Does a full bladder assist insertion of intrauterine contraception? A randomised trial","volume":"39","author":"Cameron","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.04.004","article-title":"Comparison of the analgesic effects of oral tramadol and naproxen sodium on pain relief during IUD insertion","volume":"19","author":"Karabayirli","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0205","first-page":"226","article-title":"Pain relief with naproxen following insertion of an intrauterine device","volume":"13","author":"Massey","year":"1974","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2647","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem244","article-title":"Cervical priming with sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"22","author":"Saav","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0215","first-page":"6958","article-title":"Prophylactic use of prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors in connection with IUD insertion","volume":"160","author":"Jensen","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ugeskr Laeger"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0220","article-title":"Lidocaine 10% spray to the cervix reduces pain during intrauterine device insertion: a double-blind randomised controlled trial","author":"Aksoy","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.11.012","article-title":"Prophylactic ibuprofen does not improve pain with IUD insertion: a randomized trial","volume":"91","author":"Bednarek","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.10.015","article-title":"Ibuprofen prophylaxis for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"85","author":"Chor","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.5455\/2320-1770.ijrcog20130902","article-title":"Paracervical block with 1% lidocaine for pain control during intrauterine device insertion: a prospective, single-blinded, controlled study","volume":"2","author":"Cirik","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.09.018","article-title":"Cervical lidocaine for IUD insertional pain: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"207","author":"McNicholas","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"704","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.004","article-title":"Pain control for intrauterine device insertion: a randomized trial of 1% lidocaine paracervical block","volume":"86","author":"Mody","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.4103\/0019-5359.100337","article-title":"Effect of lidocaine gel on pain from copper IUD insertion: a randomized double-blind controlled trial","volume":"64","author":"Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Indian J Med Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.12.009","article-title":"Intrauterine infusion of lidocaine does not reduce pain scores during IUD insertion","volume":"88","author":"Nelson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000912","article-title":"Ketorolac for pain control with intrauterine device placement","volume":"126","author":"Ngo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.5539\/gjhs.v7n4p399","article-title":"Lidocaine-Prilocaine cream as analgesia for IUD insertion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, triple blinded study","volume":"7","author":"Tavakolian","year":"2015","journal-title":"Glob J Health Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.10.026","article-title":"Novel topical formulation of lidocaine provides significant pain relief for intrauterine device insertion: pharmacokinetic evaluation and randomized placebo-controlled trial","volume":"103","author":"Tornblom-Paulander","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014_bb0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2005.01.036","article-title":"Cervical softening with vaginal misoprostol before intrauterine device insertion","volume":"89","author":"Li","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782416301354?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782416301354?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,10]],"date-time":"2018-09-10T17:53:13Z","timestamp":1536601993000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782416301354"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782416301354"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Medications to ease intrauterine device insertion: a systematic review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.014","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}