{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T02:56:23Z","timestamp":1788922583715,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,1]],"date-time":"2017-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1485907200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,1]],"date-time":"2017-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1485907200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","contraceptionjournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,9]],"date-time":"2016-09-09T19:22:51Z","timestamp":1473448971000},"page":"175-180","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Documenting moral agency: a qualitative analysis of abortion decision making for fetal indications"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"95","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4431-9729","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lori M.","family":"Gawron","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Katie","family":"Watson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.283739","article-title":"Piece of my mind. Reframing regret","volume":"311","author":"Watson","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0010","author":"Guttmacher Institute"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0015","series-title":"Roe v Wade, 410 US 113","year":"1973"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0020","series-title":"Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey, 505 US 833","year":"1992"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0025","author":"Center for Reproductive Rights"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0030","author":"Guttmacher Institute"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1462","article-title":"Variation in the decision to terminate pregnancy in the setting of fetal aneuploidy","volume":"26","author":"Shaffer","year":"2006","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01700.x","article-title":"Survey of prenatal screening policies in Europe for structural malformations and chromosome anomalies, and their impact on detection and termination rates for neural tube defects and Down's syndrome","volume":"115","author":"Boyd","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.281.10.937","article-title":"Medical futility in end-of-life care","volume":"281","author":"Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs","year":"1999","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.12.004","article-title":"An exploration of women's reasons for termination timing in the setting of fetal abnormalities","volume":"88","author":"Gawron","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0055","series-title":"Ethical decision making in obstetrics and gynecology","author":"Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology","year":"2004"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0060","series-title":"Sociological methods: a sourcebook (methodological perspectives)","author":"Denzin","year":"2006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0065","series-title":"Principles of biomedical ethics","author":"TL","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0070","series-title":"No longer patient: Feminist Ethics & Healthcare","author":"Sherwin","year":"1992"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0075","series-title":"Narrative medicine: honoring the stories of illness","first-page":"203","article-title":"The bioethics of narrative medicine","author":"Charon","year":"2006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0080","series-title":"The fiction of bioethics: cases as literary texts","author":"Chambers","year":"1999"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1136\/mh.29.2.65","article-title":"Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them?","volume":"29","author":"McCarthy","year":"2003","journal-title":"Med Humanit"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2012-100491","article-title":"Responsibly counselling women about the clinical management of pregnancies complicated by severe fetal anomalies","volume":"38","author":"Chervenak","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782416304012?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782416304012?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,14]],"date-time":"2025-09-14T20:12:14Z","timestamp":1757880734000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782416304012"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782416304012"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Documenting moral agency: a qualitative analysis of abortion decision making for fetal indications","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.020","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}