{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,10]],"date-time":"2026-06-10T19:43:16Z","timestamp":1781120596453,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,1]],"date-time":"2017-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1488326400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,9]],"date-time":"2016-11-09T06:49:25Z","timestamp":1478674165000},"page":"257-262","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Intrauterine contraception after medical abortion: factors affecting success of early insertion"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"95","author":[{"given":"Elina","family":"Pohjoranta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Satu","family":"Suhonen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2450-8725","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maarit","family":"Mentula","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Oskari","family":"Heikinheimo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.013","article-title":"Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion","volume":"78","author":"Heikinheimo","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1291","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318273eb56","article-title":"Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception","volume":"120","author":"Peipert","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.102","article-title":"Impact of long-acting reversible contraception on return for repeat abortion","volume":"206","author":"Rose","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2011-100166","article-title":"Assessment of a 'fast-track' referral service for intrauterine contraception following early medical abortion","volume":"38","author":"Cameron","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0025","first-page":"CD001777","article-title":"Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices","author":"Grimes","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0030","first-page":"CD001777","article-title":"Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices","volume":"7","author":"Okusanya","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0035","series-title":"Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.003","article-title":"Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion","volume":"78","author":"Goodman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.06.018","article-title":"Immediate placement of intrauterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination","volume":"83","author":"Fox","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01099.x","article-title":"Attendance at post-abortal follow-up visits is low - can the risks of non-attendance be identified?","volume":"90","author":"Pohjoranta","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0055","series-title":"Abortion statistics 2014","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0060","series-title":"Abortion statistics, England and Wales 2014","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0065","series-title":"Abort - fakta med statistikk","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0070","series-title":"Termination of pregnancy statistics","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0075","unstructured":"Statistik om aborter 2015. Socialstyrelsen; 2016. [http:\/\/www.socialstyrelsen.se\/publikationer2016\/2016-5-20, Last accessed: 8.6.2016]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0080","series-title":"Induced abortion in the United States","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b5ccf9","article-title":"Immediate complications after medical compared with surgical termination of pregnancy","volume":"114","author":"Niinim\u00e4ki","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e48948","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0048948","article-title":"Early versus delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after medical abortion - a randomized controlled trial","volume":"7","author":"Saav","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.007","article-title":"Postabortal and postpartum contraception","volume":"28","author":"Cameron","year":"2014","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822ade67","article-title":"Timing of copper intrauterine device insertion after medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"118","author":"Shimoni","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2539","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev233","article-title":"Provision of intrauterine contraception in association with first trimester induced abortion reduces the need of repeat abortion: first-year results of a randomized controlled trial","volume":"30","author":"Pohjoranta","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0110","author":"Current Care Guidelines: Abortion"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2208","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1011600","article-title":"Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration","volume":"364","author":"Bednarek","year":"2011","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00012-5","article-title":"Verifying the effectiveness of medical abortion; ultrasound versus hCG testing","volume":"109","author":"Fiala","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(02)00492-4","article-title":"The learning curve is rapid in medical termination of pregnancy--first-year results from the Helsinki area","volume":"67","author":"Suhonen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6404","article-title":"Endometrial thickness following medical abortion is not predictive of subsequent surgical intervention","volume":"34","author":"Reeves","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.01.006","article-title":"Can ultrasound predict IUD expulsion after medical abortion?","volume":"89","author":"Shimoni","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782416304796?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782416304796?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,6]],"date-time":"2018-09-06T18:25:53Z","timestamp":1536258353000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782416304796"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782416304796"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Intrauterine contraception after medical abortion: factors affecting success of early insertion","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}