{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]],"date-time":"2026-04-30T05:23:12Z","timestamp":1777526592190,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,1]],"date-time":"2017-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1501545600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,3]],"date-time":"2017-04-03T17:55:55Z","timestamp":1491242155000},"page":"81-88","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["A survey regarding acceptability of oral emergency contraception according to the posited mechanism of action"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"96","author":[{"given":"S.J.","family":"Willetts","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"MacDougall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S.T.","family":"Cameron","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"9549","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1782","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)69737-7","article-title":"Unintended pregnancy and use of emergency contraception among a large cohort of women attending for antenatal care or abortion in Scotland","volume":"368","author":"Lakha","year":"2006","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"9907","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1807","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)62071-1","article-title":"The prevalence of unplanned pregnancy and associated factors in Britain: findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (NATSAL-3)","volume":"382","author":"Wellings","year":"2013","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"S1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S43","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2013.301416","article-title":"Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001\u20132008","volume":"104","author":"Finer","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.02.012","article-title":"Ongoing contraception after use of emergency contraception from a specialist contraceptive service","volume":"84","author":"Cameron","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0025","first-page":"7","article-title":"Emergency contraception: a last chance to prevent unintended pregnancy","volume":"6","author":"Trussell","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contemp Read Law Soc Justice"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.03.007","article-title":"Contraceptive failures and determinants of emergency contraception use","volume":"74","author":"Goulard","year":"2006","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"9714","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)60101-8","article-title":"Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis","volume":"375","author":"Glasier","year":"2010","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2013-100702","article-title":"Embracing post-fertilisation methods of family planning: a call to action","volume":"39","author":"Raymond","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev019","article-title":"Emergency contraception. Widely available and effective but disappointing as a public health intervention: a review","volume":"30","author":"ESHRE Capri Workshop Group","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0050","author":"British Medical Association"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137705","article-title":"Do women want a once-a-month pill?","volume":"7","author":"Rimmer","year":"1992","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3018","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.12.3018","article-title":"An international study on the acceptability of a once-a-month pill","volume":"14","author":"Glasier","year":"1999","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2013-100730","article-title":"Contraceptive use among women presenting to pharmacies for emergency contraception: an opportunity for intervention","volume":"40","author":"Michie","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.10.032","article-title":"Identifying women in need of further discussion about the decision to have an abortion and eventual outcome","volume":"88","author":"Cameron","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0075","series-title":"Carstairs scores for Scottish postcode sectors, datazones and output areas from the 2011 census","author":"Brown","year":"2014"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2012-100497","article-title":"Myths and misconceptions about intrauterine contraception among women seeking termination of pregnancy","volume":"40","author":"Michie","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0085","series-title":"Applied logistic regression","author":"Hosmer","year":"2013"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2003.09.009","article-title":"Menstrual induction with mifepristone and misoprostol","volume":"68","author":"Xiao","year":"2003","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(87)90119-3","article-title":"Uses of RU 486 for contragestion: an update","volume":"36","author":"Ulmann","year":"1987","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)60189-9","article-title":"Contragestion with late luteal administration of RU 486 (mifepristone)","volume":"50","author":"Dubois","year":"1988","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782417301002?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782417301002?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,3]],"date-time":"2018-09-03T01:28:34Z","timestamp":1535938114000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782417301002"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782417301002"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A survey regarding acceptability of oral emergency contraception according to the posited mechanism of action","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.03.012","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}