{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,26]],"date-time":"2026-06-26T22:40:23Z","timestamp":1782513623951,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,1]],"date-time":"2017-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1509494400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa"},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003125","name":"Finnish Cultural Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003125","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Finnish\u2013Norwegian Medical Foundation"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,5]],"date-time":"2017-08-05T21:46:35Z","timestamp":1501969595000},"page":"344-351","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Fast-track vs. delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system after early medical abortion \u2014 a randomized trial"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"96","author":[{"given":"Riina","family":"Korjamo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maarit","family":"Mentula","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Oskari","family":"Heikinheimo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1363\/46e0414","article-title":"Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011","volume":"46","author":"Jones","year":"2014","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0010","author":"Gov.uk"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0015","author":"National Institute for Health and Welfare, Official Statistics of Finland"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0020","author":"Socialstyrelsen, Sverige"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1074","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03407.x","article-title":"Effect of contraception provided at termination of pregnancy and incidence of subsequent termination of pregnancy","volume":"119","author":"Cameron","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.013","article-title":"Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion","volume":"78","author":"Heikinheimo","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2539","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev233","article-title":"Provision of intrauterine contraception in association with first trimester induced abortion reduces the need of repeat abortion: first-year results of a randomized controlled trial","volume":"30","author":"Pohjoranta","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2484","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew238","article-title":"Immediate versus delayed insertion of an etonogestrel releasing implant at medical abortion \u2014 a randomized controlled equivalence trial","volume":"31","author":"Hognert","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(03)00104-5","article-title":"Randomized comparison of levonorgestrel- and copper-releasing intrauterine systems immediately after abortion, with 5 years' follow-up","volume":"68","author":"Pakarinen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0050","first-page":"CD001777","article-title":"Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices","volume":"6","author":"Grimes","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.007","article-title":"Intrauterine contraceptive insertion postabortion: a systematic review","volume":"84","author":"Steenland","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0060","first-page":"Cd001777","article-title":"Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices","volume":"7","author":"Okusanya","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01099.x","article-title":"Attendance at post-abortal follow-up visits is low \u2014 can the risks of non-attendance be identified?","volume":"90","author":"Pohjoranta","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2011-100166","article-title":"Assessment of a \u2018fast-track' referral service for intrauterine contraception following early medical abortion","volume":"38","author":"Cameron","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e48948","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0048948","article-title":"Early versus delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after medical abortion \u2014 a randomized controlled trial","volume":"7","author":"Saav","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.013","article-title":"Ovulation resumption after medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol","volume":"84","author":"Schreiber","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.10.006","article-title":"Intrauterine device insertion after medical abortion","volume":"83","author":"Betstadt","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822ade67","article-title":"Timing of copper intrauterine device insertion after medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"118","author":"Shimoni","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0095","author":"The Finnish Medical Society Duodecim"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0100","author":"Sealed Envelope Ltd"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2208","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1011600","article-title":"Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration","volume":"364","author":"Bednarek","year":"2011","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(01)00212-8","article-title":"Immediate postabortal contraception with the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, Norplant, and traditional methods","volume":"63","author":"Ortayli","year":"2001","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.008","article-title":"Increasing intrauterine contraception use by reducing barriers to post-abortal and interval insertion","volume":"78","author":"Goodman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.11.019","article-title":"Insertion of intrauterine contraceptives immediately following first- and second-trimester abortions","volume":"79","author":"Drey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(96)00175-8","article-title":"A 12-month comparative clinical investigation of a levonorgestrel-releasing intracervical device situated in the uterine cavity or cervical canal","volume":"54","author":"Pakarinen","year":"1996","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"d2111","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d2111","article-title":"Comparison of rates of adverse events in adolescent and adult women undergoing medical abortion: population register based study","volume":"342","author":"Niinimaki","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b5ccf9","article-title":"Immediate complications after medical compared with surgical termination of pregnancy","volume":"114","author":"Niinimaki","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.10.012","article-title":"Intrauterine contraception after medical abortion: factors affecting success of early insertion","volume":"95","author":"Pohjoranta","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782417302135?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782417302135?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,3]],"date-time":"2021-04-03T08:29:32Z","timestamp":1617438572000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782417302135"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782417302135"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Fast-track vs. delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system after early medical abortion \u2014 a randomized trial","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.07.008","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}