{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T02:34:55Z","timestamp":1782700495194,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,1]],"date-time":"2018-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1517443200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,16]],"date-time":"2017-09-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1505520000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,19]],"date-time":"2017-09-19T11:16:39Z","timestamp":1505819799000},"page":"90-99","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":40,"title":["Efficacy of medical abortion prior to 6 gestational weeks: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"97","author":[{"given":"Nathalie","family":"Kapp","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maureen K.","family":"Baldwin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria Isabel","family":"Rodriguez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03310.x","article-title":"Acceptability of misoprostol-only medical termination of pregnancy compared with vacuum aspiration: an international, multicentre trial","volume":"119","author":"Rodriguez","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70511-8","article-title":"Safety, efficacy, and acceptability of medical abortion in China, Cuba, and India: a comparative trial of mifepristone-misoprostol versus surgical abortion","volume":"176","author":"Winikoff","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0015","first-page":"CD002855","article-title":"Medical methods for first trimester abortion","author":"Kulier","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1363\/psrh.12015","article-title":"Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2014","volume":"49","author":"Jones","year":"2017","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyw270","article-title":"Implementing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in Norway 1998\u20132013","author":"Lokeland","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0030","series-title":"Preventing unsafe abortion","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2016"},{"issue":"10017","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00838-7","article-title":"Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN maternal mortality estimation inter-agency group","volume":"387","author":"Alkema","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet (Lond Engl)"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13273.x","article-title":"Comparison of two doses of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol for early medical abortion: a randomised trial","volume":"107","author":"World Health Organisation Task Force on Post-ovulatory Methods of Fertility R","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.011","article-title":"First-trimester medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol: a systematic review","volume":"87","author":"Raymond","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1303","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818d8eb4","article-title":"Two distinct oral routes of misoprostol in mifepristone medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"112","author":"Winikoff","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.019","article-title":"Can women accurately assess the outcome of medical abortion based on symptoms alone?","volume":"85","author":"Jackson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(00)00154-2","volume":"62","author":"Indian Council of Medical Research","year":"2000","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2008.00864.x","article-title":"Mifepristone plus vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol alone for medical abortion in gestation 63 days or less in Nepalese women: a quasi-randomized controlled trial","volume":"35","author":"Chawdhary","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1177\/1933719114557897","article-title":"Effectiveness and safety of lower doses of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for the termination of ultra-early pregnancy: a dose-ranging randomized controlled trial","volume":"22","author":"Li","year":"2015","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0075","article-title":"Efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-dose mifepristone and self-administered misoprostol for ultra-early medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial","author":"Li","year":"2016","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00948.x","article-title":"Regimens of misoprostol with mifepristone for early medical abortion: a randomised trial","volume":"113","author":"Shannon","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.1.92","article-title":"A randomized comparison of medical abortion and surgical vacuum aspiration at 10\u201313 weeks gestation","volume":"17","author":"Ashok","year":"2002","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.08.012","article-title":"Termination of early pregnancy using flexible, low-dose mifepristone-misoprostol regimens","volume":"76","author":"Heikinheimo","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.10.006","article-title":"A pilot study of mifepristone and misoprostol administered at the same time for abortion up to 49 days gestation","volume":"71","author":"Murthy","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00209.x","article-title":"Is home-based administration of prostaglandin safe and feasible for medical abortion? Results from a multisite study in Vietnam","volume":"111","author":"Ngoc","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0105","series-title":"Food and Drug Administration","author":"Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Statistical Review Application Number: 20-687","year":"2000"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(01)00200-1","article-title":"Mifepristone and misoprostol for early abortion when no gestational sac is present","volume":"63","author":"Schaff","year":"2001","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.1.67","article-title":"A comparative study of surgical and medical procedures: 932 pregnancy terminations up to 63 days gestation","volume":"16","author":"Child","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1477","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.6.1477","article-title":"A prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol to vaginal misoprostol alone for elective termination of early pregnancy","volume":"17","author":"Jain","year":"2002","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(01)00196-2","article-title":"First trimester abortion with mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol","volume":"63","author":"Knudsen","year":"2001","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq037","article-title":"Home self-administration of vaginal misoprostol for medical abortion at 50\u201363 days compared with gestation of below 50 days","volume":"25","author":"Kopp Kallner","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"18","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1241","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199804303381801","article-title":"Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States","volume":"338","author":"Spitz","year":"1998","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2315","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg475","article-title":"A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on the use of mifepristone with sublingual or vaginal misoprostol for medical abortions of less than 9 weeks gestation","volume":"18","author":"Tang","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2003.02430.x","article-title":"WHO multinational study of three misoprostol regimens after mifepristone for early medical abortion. I: efficacy","volume":"110","author":"von Hertzen","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006_bb0150","series-title":"Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2012"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782417304389?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782417304389?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,27]],"date-time":"2018-08-27T10:59:00Z","timestamp":1535367540000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782417304389"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782417304389"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Efficacy of medical abortion prior to 6 gestational weeks: a systematic review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.006","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}