{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,10]],"date-time":"2026-01-10T23:01:14Z","timestamp":1768086074090,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,1]],"date-time":"2018-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1530403200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,1]],"date-time":"2018-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1530403200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","contraceptionjournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,10]],"date-time":"2018-03-10T20:33:49Z","timestamp":1520714029000},"page":"30-35","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Low-sensitivity urine pregnancy testing to assess medical abortion outcome: A systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"98","author":[{"given":"Elizabeth G.","family":"Raymond","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tara","family":"Shochet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hillary","family":"Bracken","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000897","article-title":"Mifepristone with buccal misoprostol for medical abortion: a systematic review","volume":"126","author":"Chen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.011","article-title":"First-trimester medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol: a systematic review","volume":"87","author":"Raymond","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.12.004","article-title":"Serial multilevel urine pregnancy testing to assess medical abortion outcome: a meta-analysis","volume":"95","author":"Raymond","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.08.008","article-title":"Feasibility of telephone follow-up after medical abortion","volume":"81","author":"Perriera","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009","article-title":"QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"155","author":"Whiting","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v036.i03","article-title":"Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package","volume":"36","author":"Viechtbauer","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Stat Softw"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0035","series-title":"R: a language and environment for statistical computing","author":"R Development Core Team","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c996f3","article-title":"Alternatives to a routine follow-up visit for early medical abortion","volume":"115","author":"Clark","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.11.010","article-title":"Telephone follow-up and self-performed urine pregnancy testing after early medical abortion: a service evaluation","volume":"86","author":"Cameron","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0179600","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0179600","article-title":"Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial","volume":"12","author":"Constant","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.03.016","article-title":"RU OK? The acceptability and feasibility of remote technologies for follow-up after early medical abortion","volume":"90","author":"Bracken","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e537","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(15)00150-3","article-title":"Self-assessment of the outcome of early medical abortion versus clinic follow-up in India: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial","volume":"3","author":"Iyengar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61054-0","article-title":"Clinical follow-up compared with self-assessment of outcome after medical abortion: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"Oppegaard","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.01.010","article-title":"Simplified follow-up after early medical abortion: 12-month experience of a telephone call and self-performed low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test","volume":"89","author":"Michie","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.09.009","article-title":"Can women determine the success of early medical termination of pregnancy themselves?","volume":"91","author":"Cameron","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0080","article-title":"Comparison of two low-sensitivity urine pregnancy tests for confirming the success of early medical abortion","author":"Millar","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.11.013","article-title":"Feasibility of self-performed urine pregnancy testing for follow-up after medical abortion","volume":"197","author":"Hassoun","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.01.021","article-title":"Clinical utility of urine pregnancy assays to determine medical abortion outcome is limited","volume":"75","author":"Godfrey","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.007","article-title":"Comparing office and telephone follow-up after medical abortion","volume":"94","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.05.019","article-title":"Can women accurately assess the outcome of medical abortion based on symptoms alone?","volume":"85","author":"Jackson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782418300933?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782418300933?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,14]],"date-time":"2025-09-14T20:12:55Z","timestamp":1757880775000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782418300933"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,7]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782418300933"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Low-sensitivity urine pregnancy testing to assess medical abortion outcome: A systematic review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}