{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,29]],"date-time":"2026-01-29T13:13:24Z","timestamp":1769692404568,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,25]],"date-time":"2018-09-25T22:08:30Z","timestamp":1537913310000},"page":"56-60","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Women's preferences for permanent contraception method and willingness to be randomized for a hypothetical trial"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"99","author":[{"given":"Adriana","family":"Piazza","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kelly","family":"Schwirian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fiona","family":"Scott","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Machelle D.","family":"Wilson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nikki B.","family":"Zite","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mitchell D.","family":"Creinin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.10.003","article-title":"Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014","volume":"97","author":"Kavanaugh","year":"2018","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1161","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70658-0","article-title":"The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. collaborative review of sterilization","volume":"174","author":"Peterson","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.04.019","article-title":"The role of the fallopian tube in the origin of ovarian cancer","volume":"209","author":"Erickson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000422","article-title":"Female tubal sterilization: the time has come to routinely consider removal","volume":"124","author":"Creinin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmq030","article-title":"Tubal ligation and the risk of ovarian cancer: review and meta-analysis","volume":"17","author":"Cibula","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyt042","article-title":"Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer subtypes: a pooled analysis of case-control studies","volume":"42","author":"Sieh","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2014.10.005","article-title":"Effect of tubal sterilization technique on the risk of serous epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma","volume":"135","author":"Lessard-Anderson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471.e1-11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.003","article-title":"Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention","volume":"210","author":"McAlpine","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.02.017","article-title":"Safety outcomes of female sterilization by salpingectomy and tubal occlusion","volume":"95","author":"Westberg","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1185","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4340-x","article-title":"Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery","volume":"295","author":"Shiner","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0055","first-page":"961","article-title":"Salpingectomy for sterilization: change in practice in a large integrated health care system, 2011\u20132016","volume":"130","author":"Powell","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gyncecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.06.003","article-title":"Successful completion of total and partial salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery","volume":"38","author":"Lehn","year":"2018","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000459871.88564.09","volume":"125","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.07.004","article-title":"The use of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of benign hysterectomy","author":"Till","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0075","first-page":"41","article-title":"An updated assessment of postpartum sterilization fulfillment after vaginal delivery","volume":"96","author":"Wolfe","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.2307\/2991517","article-title":"Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982-1995","volume":"30","author":"Piccinino","year":"1998","journal-title":"Fam Plann Perspect"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782418304360?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782418304360?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,10]],"date-time":"2019-02-10T15:27:02Z","timestamp":1549812422000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782418304360"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782418304360"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Women's preferences for permanent contraception method and willingness to be randomized for a hypothetical trial","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.09.004","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}