{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T11:49:30Z","timestamp":1769600970497,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,19]],"date-time":"2018-11-19T07:26:19Z","timestamp":1542612379000},"page":"98-103","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["Barriers and outcomes associated with unfulfilled requests for permanent contraception following vaginal delivery"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"99","author":[{"given":"Rachel","family":"Flink-Bochacki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sheila","family":"Flaum","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sarah J","family":"Betstadt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1007\/s13524-014-0359-9","article-title":"Pregnancy intentions, maternal behaviors, and infant health: investigating relationships with new measures and propensity score analysis","volume":"52","author":"Kost","year":"2015","journal-title":"Demography"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0010","series-title":"Unintended pregnancy in the United States","year":"2015"},{"issue":"127","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0015","first-page":"66","article-title":"Committee opinion no. 654: reproductive life planning to reduce unintended pregnancy","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.12.005","article-title":"The evidence mounts on the benefits of preventing unintended pregnancy","volume":"87","author":"Finer","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1728-4465.2008.00148.x","article-title":"The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature","volume":"39","author":"Gipson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Stud Fam Plan"},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S43","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2013.301416","article-title":"Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001\u20132008","volume":"104","author":"Finer","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.040","article-title":"Racial and ethnic disparities in postpartum care and contraception in California's Medicaid program","volume":"217","author":"Thiel de Bocanegra","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1007\/s10995-016-2044-7","article-title":"Understanding factors associated with postpartum visit attendance and contraception choices: listening to low-income postpartum women and health care providers","volume":"20","author":"Henderson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Matern Child Health J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0045","series-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin","article-title":"Benefits and risks of sterilization","volume":"#133","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0050","series-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion","article-title":"Access to postpartum sterilization","volume":"#530","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2012"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.03.029","article-title":"Tubal sterilization trends in the United States","volume":"94","author":"Chan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f73eaa","article-title":"One-year follow-up of women with unfulfilled postpartum sterilization requests","volume":"116","author":"Thurman","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.09.011","article-title":"A qualitative study of barriers to postpartum sterilization and women's attitudes toward unfulfilled sterilization requests","volume":"77","author":"Gilliam","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.10.014","article-title":"Barriers to obtaining a desired postpartum tubal sterilization","volume":"73","author":"Zite","year":"2006","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"794","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157208.37923.17","article-title":"Failure to obtain desired postpartum sterilization: risk and predictors","volume":"105","author":"Zite","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0080","first-page":"41","article-title":"An updated assessment of postpartum sterilization fulfillment after vaginal delivery","volume":"96","author":"Wolfe","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.02.012","article-title":"Medicaid and fulfillment of desired postpartum sterilization","volume":"97","author":"Arora","year":"2018","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002803","article-title":"Role of bridge contraception in postpartum long-acting reversible contraception and sterilization fulfillment rates","volume":"132","author":"Montague","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1486","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.84.9.1486","article-title":"The adequacy of prenatal care utilization index: its US distribution and association with low birthweight","volume":"84","author":"Kotelchuck","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1007\/s10995-015-1815-x","article-title":"Association between obesity during pregnancy and the adequacy of prenatal care","volume":"20","author":"Zozzaro-Smith","year":"2016","journal-title":"Matern Child Health J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.009","article-title":"Request and fulfillment of postpartum tubal ligation in patients after high-risk pregnancy","volume":"95","author":"Albanese","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0110","first-page":"32","article-title":"Barriers to completion of desired postpartum sterilization","volume":"96","author":"Boardman","year":"2013","journal-title":"R I Med J (2013)"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1822","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2012.300850","article-title":"Federally funded sterilization: time to rethink policy?","volume":"102","author":"Borrero","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp1313325","article-title":"Medicaid policy on sterilization \u2014 anachronistic or still relevant?","volume":"370","author":"Borrero","year":"2014","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.11.007","article-title":"Immediate postpartum long acting reversible contraception: the time is now","volume":"95","author":"Moniz","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1078","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001970","article-title":"Inpatient postpartum long-acting reversible contraception and sterilization in the United States, 2008\u20132013","volume":"129","author":"Moniz","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.10.003","article-title":"Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014","volume":"97","author":"Kavanaugh","year":"2018","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2017.09.006","article-title":"Postpartum tubal ligation: a retrospective review of anesthetic management at a single institution and a practice survey of academic institutions","volume":"43","author":"McKenzie","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1225","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000002174","article-title":"Postpartum tubal sterilization: making the case for urgency","volume":"126","author":"Richardson","year":"2018","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005_bb0150","series-title":"Email to Flink-Bochacki R (flinkbr@amc.edu)","article-title":"ExITS study","author":"Mercier","year":"2018"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S001078241830489X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S001078241830489X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,25]],"date-time":"2019-01-25T23:10:53Z","timestamp":1548457853000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S001078241830489X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S001078241830489X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Barriers and outcomes associated with unfulfilled requests for permanent contraception following vaginal delivery","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.005","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}