{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,24]],"date-time":"2026-08-24T23:07:02Z","timestamp":1787612822590,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","contraceptionjournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,4]],"date-time":"2019-09-04T11:35:30Z","timestamp":1567596930000},"page":"56-61","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Characteristics of patients having telemedicine versus in-person informed consent visits before abortion in Utah"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"101","author":[{"given":"Sara","family":"Daniel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5025-2412","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sarah","family":"Raifman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shelly","family":"Kaller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Grossman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0005","unstructured":"Guttmacher Institute. Counseling and Waiting Periods for Abortion. 2019. Available at https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/state-policy\/explore\/counseling-and-waiting-periods-abortion. Accessed August 25, 2019."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1363\/psrh.12024","article-title":"Barriers to abortion care and their consequences for patients traveling for services: qualitative findings from two states","volume":"49","author":"Jerman","year":"2017","journal-title":"Perspect Sexual Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0015","series-title":"The impact of state mandatory counseling and waiting period laws on abortion: a literature review","author":"Joyce","year":"2009"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.09.008","article-title":"Measuring decisional certainty among women seeking abortion","volume":"95","author":"Ralph","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1363\/48e8216","article-title":"Utah's 72-hour waiting period for abortion: experiences among a clinic-based sample of women","volume":"48","author":"Roberts","year":"2016","journal-title":"Perspect Sexual Reprod Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2016.06.004","article-title":"The longest wait: examining the impact of Utah's 72-hour waiting period for abortion","volume":"26","author":"Sanders","year":"2016","journal-title":"Women's Health Issues"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2017.04.002","article-title":"Travel for abortion services in Alabama and delays obtaining care","volume":"27","author":"White","year":"2017","journal-title":"Women's Health Issues"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0040","unstructured":"National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The safety and quality of abortion care in the United States. National Academies Press; 2018."},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"736","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijmedinf.2010.08.006","article-title":"Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews","volume":"79","author":"Ekeland","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Med Inf"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e117","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2012.12.002","article-title":"Women's and providers' experiences with medical abortion provided through telemedicine: a qualitative study","volume":"23","author":"Grindlay","year":"2013","journal-title":"Women's Health Issues."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.1177\/1357633X16659166","article-title":"Telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Alaska: through the provider\u2019s lens","volume":"23","author":"Grindlay","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318224d110","article-title":"Effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion provided through telemedicine","volume":"118","author":"Grossman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2012.301097","article-title":"Changes in service delivery patterns after introduction of telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Iowa","volume":"103","author":"Grossman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0070","unstructured":"Abortion Waiting Period, H.B. 461, Legislature of the state of Utah, 2012."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0075","first-page":"20(5)","article-title":"Identifying national availability of abortion care and distance from major US cities: systematic online search","author":"Cartwright","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1363\/46e0414","article-title":"Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011","volume":"46","author":"Jones","year":"2014","journal-title":"Perspect Sexual Reprod Health"},{"issue":"24","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2497","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.7675","article-title":"Association of facility type with procedural-related morbidities and adverse events among patients undergoing induced abortions","volume":"319","author":"Roberts","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000603","article-title":"Incidence of emergency department visits and complications after abortion","volume":"125","author":"Upadhyay","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0095","article-title":"GEOROUTE: Stata module to calculate travel distance and travel time between two addresses or two geographical points","author":"Weber","year":"2017","journal-title":"Stat Software Compon"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0100","article-title":"SPMAP: Stata module to visualize spatial data","author":"Pisati","year":"2018","journal-title":"Stat Software Compon"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2019.04.009","article-title":"Women's experiences using telemedicine to attend abortion information visits in Utah: a qualitative study","author":"Ehrenreich","year":"2019","journal-title":"Women's Health Issues"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S001078241930407X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S001078241930407X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,14]],"date-time":"2025-09-14T20:14:53Z","timestamp":1757880893000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S001078241930407X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S001078241930407X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Characteristics of patients having telemedicine versus in-person informed consent visits before abortion in Utah","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.08.010","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}