{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,15]],"date-time":"2026-05-15T17:08:33Z","timestamp":1778864913299,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,1]],"date-time":"2020-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1580515200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,1]],"date-time":"2020-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1580515200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","contraceptionjournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,4]],"date-time":"2019-12-04T11:23:37Z","timestamp":1575458617000},"page":"122-129","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Access to IUD removal: Data from a mystery-caller study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"101","author":[{"given":"Jennifer R.","family":"Amico","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chiara","family":"Heintz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ariana H.","family":"Bennett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marji","family":"Gold","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1291","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318273eb56","article-title":"Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception","volume":"120","author":"Peipert","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmq026","article-title":"Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"17","author":"Blumenthal","year":"2011","journal-title":"Human Reprod Update"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.07.016","article-title":"Burden of unintended pregnancy in the united states: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"87","author":"Trussell","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1434","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c6f965","article-title":"ACOG Committee opinion no. 450: increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy","volume":"114","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.07.021","article-title":"Looking inward: provider-based barriers to contraception among teens and young adults","volume":"78","author":"Brown","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.08.007","article-title":"Removing medical barriers to contraception \u2013 evidence-based recommendations from the centers for disease control and prevention, 2016","volume":"94","author":"Curtis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2009.11.006","article-title":"Health care providers' knowledge about contraceptive evidence: a barrier to quality family planning care?","volume":"81","author":"Dehlendorf","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.008","article-title":"Increasing intrauterine contraception use by reducing barriers to post-abortal and interval insertion","volume":"78","author":"Goodman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.09.003","article-title":"Barriers associated with the failure to return for intrauterine device insertion following first-trimester abortion","volume":"79","author":"Stanek","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"616","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2015.06.004","article-title":"Barriers to receiving long-acting reversible contraception in the postpartum period","volume":"25","author":"Zerden","year":"2015","journal-title":"Women\u2019s Health Issues"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1783\/147118906776276170","article-title":"What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study","volume":"32","author":"Asker","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.07.003","article-title":"Interest in using intrauterine contraception when the option of self-removal is provided","volume":"85","author":"Foster","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1363\/4419412","article-title":"Contraceptive features preferred by women at high risk of unintended pregnancy","volume":"44","author":"Lessard","year":"2012","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e257","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2013.05.001","article-title":"Knowledge and attitudes about long-acting reversible contraception among latina women who desire sterilization","volume":"23","author":"White","year":"2013","journal-title":"Women's Health Issues"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0075","unstructured":"Mirena [package insert], 2013, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Wayne, NJ."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0080","unstructured":"Paragard [package insert]. Sellersville, PA: Teva; 2011."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.12.010","article-title":"Access to long-acting reversible contraception among US publicly funded health centers","volume":"97","author":"Bornstein","year":"2018","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.10.003","article-title":"Determinants of intrauterine contraception provision among US family physicians: a national survey of knowledge, attitudes and practice","volume":"83","author":"Rubin","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2014.06.001","article-title":"Impact of years of clinical experience on perceived contraindications and barriers to the use of LARC: a survey of family planning providers","volume":"24","author":"Philliber","year":"2014","journal-title":"Women\u2019s Health Issues"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2015.303001","article-title":"Public funding for contraception, provider training, and use of highly effective contraceptives: a cluster randomized trial","volume":"106","author":"Thompson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.01.025","article-title":"Interest in and experience with iud self-removal","volume":"90","author":"Foster","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0110","first-page":"1","article-title":"U.S. Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use","volume":"65","author":"Curtis","year":"2016","journal-title":"MMWR Recomm Rep"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.04.012","article-title":"\u201cShe just told me to leave it\u201d: women\u2019s experiences discussing early elective IUD removal","volume":"94","author":"Amico","year":"2016","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.05.007","article-title":"\u201cI wish they could hold on a little longer\u201d: Physicians\u2019 experiences with requests for early IUD removal","volume":"96","author":"Amico","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.05.014","article-title":"\u201cI think it depends on the body, with mine it didn\u2019t work\u201d: explaining young women\u2019s contraceptive implant removal","volume":"88","author":"Hoggart","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1932","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2016.303393","article-title":"Provider bias in long-acting reversible contraception (larc) promotion and removal: perceptions of young adult women","volume":"106","author":"Higgins","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1177\/147078539703900203","article-title":"Mystery customer research: cognitive processes affecting accuracy","volume":"39","author":"Morrison","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Market Res Soc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1353\/jowh.2010.0585","article-title":"From breakthrough to bust: the brief life of Norplant, the contraceptive implant","volume":"22","author":"Watkins","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Women\u2019s Hist"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.01.027","article-title":"Celebration meets caution: LARC\u2019s boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach","volume":"89","author":"Higgins","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1363\/46e1614","article-title":"Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods","volume":"46","author":"Gomez","year":"2014","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"issue":"319","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0155","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: a randomized trial of the effects of patients\u2019 race\/ethnicity and socioeconomic status","volume":"203","author":"Dehlendorf","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"561","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.06.017","article-title":"Access to the copper IUD as post-coital contraception: results from a mystery caller study","volume":"94","author":"Schubert","year":"2016","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0165","unstructured":"U.S. Census bureau. American factfinder \u2013 results. http:\/\/factfinder.census.gov\/faces\/tableservices\/jsf\/pages\/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000969","article-title":"California family planning health care providers\u2019 challenges to same-day long-acting reversible contraception provision","volume":"126","author":"Biggs","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.03.053","article-title":"Implementing best practices for the provision of long-acting reversible contraception: a survey of obstetrician-gynecologists","volume":"100","author":"Castleberry","year":"2019","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0180","unstructured":"Soni A, Stagnitti MN. Characteristics of practices used as usual source of care providers during 2015, by age\u2014Results from the MEPS Medical Organizations Survey. Statistical Brief #509. March 2018. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http:\/\/www.meps.ahrq.gov\/mepsweb\/data_files\/publications\/st509\/stat509.shtml."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa1413299","article-title":"Appointment availability after increases in medicaid payments for primary care","volume":"372","author":"Polsky","year":"2015","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0000000000000184","article-title":"Access points for the underserved: primary care appointment availability at federally qualified health centers in 10 states","volume":"52","author":"Richards","year":"2014","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0195","series-title":"Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century","author":"Institute of Medicine","year":"2001"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0200","first-page":"637","article-title":"Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists","volume":"44","author":"Harper","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fam Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008_b0205","series-title":"Recommendations for preventive services for women: final report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources & Services Administration","author":"Women\u2019s Preventive Services Initiative","year":"2016"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782419304421?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782419304421?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,14]],"date-time":"2025-09-14T20:15:13Z","timestamp":1757880913000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782419304421"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0010782419304421"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Access to IUD removal: Data from a mystery-caller study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.10.008","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}