{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T23:16:13Z","timestamp":1789082173678,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000008","name":"David and Lucile Packard Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000008","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","contraceptionjournal.org","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,24]],"date-time":"2023-02-24T13:20:42Z","timestamp":1677244842000},"page":"109996","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"special_numbering":"C","title":["An examination of loss to follow-up and potential bias in outcome ascertainment in a study of direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion in the United States"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"122","author":[{"given":"Jessica D.","family":"Rosenberg","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth","family":"Raymond","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tara","family":"Shochet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.07.005","article-title":"Telemedicine for medication abortion","volume":"100","author":"Upadhyay","year":"2019","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15553","article-title":"Safety and acceptability of medical abortion through telemedicine after 9 weeks of gestation: a population-based cohort study","volume":"126","author":"Endler","year":"2019","journal-title":"Bjog"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003357","article-title":"Medication abortion provided through telemedicine in four U.S. States","volume":"134","author":"Kohn","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701203632","article-title":"Risk factors for unsuccessful medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol","volume":"86","author":"Haimov-Kochman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.01.010","article-title":"Simplified follow-up after early medical abortion: 12-month experience of a telephone call and self-performed low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test","volume":"89","author":"Michie","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1094","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15684","article-title":"Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review","volume":"126","author":"Endler","year":"2019","journal-title":"Bjog"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.03.019","article-title":"Expansion of a direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States and experience during the COVID-19 pandemic","volume":"104","author":"Chong","year":"2021","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.05.013","article-title":"TelAbortion: evaluation of a direct to patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States","volume":"100","author":"Raymond","year":"2019","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12800","article-title":"A direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in Australia: retrospective analysis of the first 18 months","volume":"58","author":"Hyland","year":"2018","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.11.005","article-title":"Provision of medical abortion using telemedicine in Brazil","volume":"89","author":"Gomperts","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01285.x","article-title":"Regional differences in surgical intervention following medical termination of pregnancy provided by telemedicine","volume":"91","author":"Gomperts","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01787.x","article-title":"Using telemedicine for termination of pregnancy with mifepristone and misoprostol in settings where there is no access to safe services","volume":"115","author":"Gomperts","year":"2008","journal-title":"Bjog"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib13","article-title":"Self reported outcomes and adverse events after medical abortion through online telemedicine: population based study in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland","volume":"357","author":"Aiken","year":"2017","journal-title":"Bmj"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.07.038","article-title":"Use of telemedicine for providing medical abortion","volume":"124","author":"Wiebe","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.09.007","article-title":"Comparison of medical abortion follow-up with serum human chorionic gonadotropin testing and in-office assessment","volume":"85","author":"Horning","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318195dd1e","article-title":"Rates of follow-up and repeat pregnancy in the 12 months after first-trimester induced abortion","volume":"113","author":"Madden","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2018-200098","article-title":"Predicting poor compliance with follow-up and intrauterine contraception services after medical termination of pregnancy","volume":"44","author":"Pohjoranta","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03405798","article-title":"Factors associated with follow-up visit non-compliance after induced abortion","volume":"89","author":"Ntaganira","year":"1998","journal-title":"Can J Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib19","article-title":"Missing data and multiple imputation","author":"Columbia Public Health","year":"2022","journal-title":"Population Health Methods"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-017-0404-7","article-title":"Methods for significance testing of categorical covariates in logistic regression models after multiple imputation: power and applicability analysis","volume":"17","author":"Eekhout","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a115101","article-title":"The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation","volume":"129","author":"Mickey","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0006-341X.2001.00120.x","article-title":"Akaike's information criterion in generalized estimating equations","volume":"57","author":"Pan","year":"2001","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib23","first-page":"1","article-title":"mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R","volume":"45","author":"van Buuren","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Statist Softw"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2022.0217","article-title":"Outcomes and safety of history-based screening for medication abortion: a retrospective multicenter cohort study","volume":"182","author":"Upadhyay","year":"2022","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.07.108","article-title":"Clinical and service delivery implications of omitting ultrasound before medication abortion provided via direct-to-patient telemedicine and mail in the U.S","volume":"104","author":"Anger","year":"2021","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.02.004","article-title":"\u201cFalse positive\u201d urine pregnancy test results after successful medication abortion","volume":"103","author":"Raymond","year":"2021","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.04.028","article-title":"\u201cIt was close enough, but it wasn\u2019t close enough\u201d: a qualitative exploration of the impact of direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion on access to abortion care","volume":"104","author":"Kerestes","year":"2021","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.11.010","article-title":"Telephone follow-up and self-performed urine pregnancy testing after early medical abortion: a service evaluation","volume":"86","author":"Cameron","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2013.782276","article-title":"Women's satisfaction with early home medical abortion with telephone follow-up: a questionnaire-based study in the U.K","volume":"33","author":"McKay","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000897","article-title":"Mifepristone with buccal misoprostol for medical abortion: a systematic review","volume":"126","author":"Chen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib31","series-title":"Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients in 2014 and Changes Since 2008","author":"Jerman","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.03.033","article-title":"The future of abortion is now: mifepristone by mail and in-clinic abortion access in the United States","volume":"104","author":"Mark","year":"2021","journal-title":"Contraception"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110098","type":"erratum","label":"Erratum","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,1]],"date-time":"2023-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1693526400000}}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782423000586?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782423000586?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,12]],"date-time":"2023-08-12T10:21:16Z","timestamp":1691835676000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782423000586"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]},"references-count":32,"alternative-id":["S0010782423000586"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996","relation":{"erratum":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110098","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"An examination of loss to follow-up and potential bias in outcome ascertainment in a study of direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion in the United States","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.109996","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"109996"}}