{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]],"date-time":"2026-01-08T04:37:44Z","timestamp":1767847064179,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,1]],"date-time":"2023-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1693526400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,1]],"date-time":"2023-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1693526400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,1]],"date-time":"2023-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1693526400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,1]],"date-time":"2023-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1693526400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,1]],"date-time":"2023-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1693526400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,1]],"date-time":"2023-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1693526400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,1]],"date-time":"2023-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1693526400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100005492","name":"Stanford University","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100005492","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100013961","name":"Robertson Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100013961","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","contraceptionjournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,18]],"date-time":"2023-05-18T11:36:53Z","timestamp":1684409813000},"page":"110065","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Postpartum long-acting reversible contraception among privately insured: U.S. National analysis 2007\u20132016, by term and preterm birth"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"125","author":[{"given":"Jonathan G.","family":"Shaw","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lisa M.","family":"Goldthwaite","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ivana","family":"Mari\u0107","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kate A.","family":"Shaw","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"David K.","family":"Stevenson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gary M.","family":"Shaw","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2018.04.003","article-title":"The global epidemiology of preterm birth","volume":"52","author":"Vogel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"15","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1809","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.295.15.1809","article-title":"Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis","volume":"295","author":"Conde-Agudelo","year":"2006","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1293027","article-title":"The impact of inter-pregnancy interval on subsequent risk of preterm birth","volume":"31","author":"Jansa","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001913","article-title":"Interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes: causal or not","volume":"129","author":"Klebanoff","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib5","unstructured":"Report of a WHO technical consultation on birth spacing. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO;\u00a02005.\u00a0https:\/\/apps.who.int\/iris\/handle\/10665\/69855\u00a0(accessed May 5, 2023)."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e140","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002633","article-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion No. 736: optimizing postpartum care","volume":"131","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.12.006","article-title":"Examining the association between short interpregnancy interval births and the type and timing of postpartum long acting reversible contraception","volume":"112","author":"Rodriguez","year":"2022","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2020.08.016","article-title":"Associations between immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception and short interpregnancy intervals","volume":"102","author":"Wu","year":"2020","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"4S","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib9","first-page":"S886 e881","article-title":"Coverage of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception has improved birth intervals for at-risk populations","volume":"222","author":"Liberty","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001583","article-title":"Committee Opinion No. 670 Summary: immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"128","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib11","first-page":"e251","article-title":"Practice Bulletin No. 186: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices","volume":"130","author":"Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology L-ARCWG","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1078","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001970","article-title":"Inpatient postpartum long-acting reversible contraception and sterilization in the United States, 2008-2013","volume":"129","author":"Moniz","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.005","article-title":"Factors associated with postpartum use of long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"221","author":"Oduyebo","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.014","article-title":"Characterization of Medicaid policy for immediate postpartum contraception","volume":"92","author":"Moniz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib15","unstructured":"Medicaid reimbursement for postpartum LARC by state.\u00a0https:\/\/www.acog.org\/programs\/long-acting-reversible-contraception-larc\/activities-initiatives\/medicaid-reimbursement-for-postpartum-larc\u00a0(accessed December 12,\u00a02022)."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2021.09.001","article-title":"Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: review of insertion and device reimbursement policies","volume":"31","author":"Kroelinger","year":"2021","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.45175","article-title":"Postpartum contraceptive use among US Medicaid recipients","volume":"5","author":"Rodriguez","year":"2022","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2021.02.009","article-title":"Provision of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptives before and after Wisconsin Medicaid's payment change","volume":"31","author":"Kramer","year":"2021","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2016.01.005","article-title":"Medicaid administrator experiences with the implementation of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception","volume":"26","author":"Moniz","year":"2016","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2022.02.012","article-title":"Association of the affordable care act Medicaid expansions with postpartum contraceptive use and early postpartum pregnancy","volume":"113","author":"Eliason","year":"2022","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1657","DOI":"10.1007\/s10995-022-03433-2","article-title":"Association of the Delaware Contraceptive Access now initiative with postpartum LARC use","volume":"26","author":"Caudillo","year":"2022","journal-title":"Matern Child Health J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2022.03.018","article-title":"Timing of postpartum long acting, reversible contraception was not associated with 12-month removal rates in a large Medicaid sample","volume":"113","author":"Rodriguez","year":"2022","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib23","unstructured":"Medicaid\u2019s role in financing maternity care. MACPAC Fact Sheet. January\u00a02020.\u00a0https:\/\/www.macpac.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Medicaid%E2%80%99s-Role-in-Financing-Maternity-Care.pdf\u00a0(accessed October 22, 2022)."},{"issue":"16","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.1002\/bdr2.1580","article-title":"Data-driven queries between medications and spontaneous preterm birth among 2.5 million pregnancies","volume":"111","author":"Maric","year":"2019","journal-title":"Birth Defects Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.05.006","article-title":"Postpartum contraception method type and risk of a short interpregnancy interval in a state Medicaid population","volume":"104","author":"Gifford","year":"2021","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2020.25095","article-title":"Association of insurance status with provision of recommended services during comprehensive postpartum visits","volume":"3","author":"Geissler","year":"2020","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2018.7111","article-title":"Utilization of long-acting reversible contraceptives in the United States after vs before the 2016 US presidential election","volume":"179","author":"Pace","year":"2019","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2018.01.005","article-title":"The impact of the Affordable Care Act on contraceptive use and costs among privately insured women","volume":"28","author":"Snyder","year":"2018","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.01.008","article-title":"Are women benefiting from the Affordable Care Act? A real-world evaluation of the impact of the Affordable Care Act on out-of-pocket costs for contraceptives","volume":"93","author":"Law","year":"2016","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"811","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0000000000000551","article-title":"Early impact of the Affordable Care Act on uptake of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods","volume":"54","author":"Pace","year":"2016","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.08.109","article-title":"Cost sharing, postpartum contraceptive use, and short interpregnancy interval rates among commercially insured women","volume":"224","author":"Moniz","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.05.061","article-title":"Trends in use of long-acting reversible contraception during delivery hospitalizations, 2000-2019","volume":"227","author":"van Biema","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib33","unstructured":"Long-acting reversible contraception availability after childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2020.\u00a0https:\/\/www.healthaffairs.org\/do\/10.1377\/forefront.20201119.685340\/full\/\u00a0(accessed October 22,\u00a02022)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib34","unstructured":"Washington State Legislature HB 1651.\u00a0https:\/\/app.leg.wa.gov\/billsummary?BillNumber=1651&Year=2021&Initiative=false&utm_source=Upstream+USA&utm_campaign=034fdfc170-wa-updates&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_628a7e0186-034fdfc170-140754065\u00a0(accessed October 23,\u00a02022)."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"938","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-022-07822-9","article-title":"Cost-related access barriers, medical debt, and dissatisfaction with care among privately insured Americans","volume":"38","author":"Wray","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1007\/s10995-021-03118-2","article-title":"Comparing postpartum care utilization from Medicaid claims and the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system in Wisconsin, 2011-2015","volume":"25","author":"DeSisto","year":"2021","journal-title":"Matern Child Health J"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782423001385?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782423001385?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,2]],"date-time":"2025-11-02T21:12:21Z","timestamp":1762117941000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782423001385"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]},"references-count":36,"alternative-id":["S0010782423001385"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Postpartum long-acting reversible contraception among privately insured: U.S. National analysis 2007\u20132016, by term and preterm birth","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2023.110065","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"110065"}}