{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,11]],"date-time":"2026-08-11T20:27:34Z","timestamp":1786480054858,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,18]],"date-time":"2025-06-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1750204800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","contraceptionjournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,23]],"date-time":"2025-05-23T02:42:22Z","timestamp":1747968142000},"page":"110970","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Comparative performance of ultrathin and standard latex condoms: A randomized multicentre trial"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"149","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-1167-9433","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Frederic","family":"Esclassan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nina","family":"Tank","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alice","family":"Switonski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Markus J.","family":"Steiner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sarah","family":"Hood","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Unnop","family":"Jaisamrarn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib1","unstructured":"United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Family Planning 2022: Meeting the changing needs for family planning: Contraceptive use by age and method; 2022."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.05.008","article-title":"Effectiveness of the male latex condom: combined results for three popular condom brands used as controls in randomized clinical trials","volume":"70","author":"Walsh","year":"2004","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(00)00119-0","article-title":"Acceptability evaluation of a natural rubber latex, a polyurethane, and a new non-latex condom","volume":"61","author":"Frezieres","year":"2000","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.2307\/2136208","article-title":"Condom characteristics: the perceptions and preferences of men in the United States","volume":"25","author":"Grady","year":"1993","journal-title":"Fam Plann Perspect"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2019.10.012","article-title":"Levels of clinical condom failure for anal sex: a randomized cross-over trial","volume":"17","author":"Siegler","year":"2019","journal-title":"EClinicalMedicine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib6","unstructured":"International Organization for Standardization. Condoms - Guidance on clinical studies. ISO29943-1;\u00a02017."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib7","unstructured":"International Organization for Standardization. Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects - Good clinical practice. ISO14155; 2020."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1080\/ejc.7.2.71.78","article-title":"Pilot study of short-term acceptability and breakage and slippage rates for the loose-fitting polyurethane male condom eZ.on bi-directional: a randomized cross-over trial","volume":"7","author":"Bounds","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(00)00096-2","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of three Tactylon(TM) condoms and a latex condom during vaginal intercourse: breakage and slippage","volume":"61","author":"Callahan","year":"2000","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(00)00193-1","article-title":"Randomized crossover trial comparing the eZ.on plastic condom and a latex condom","volume":"63","author":"Cook","year":"2001","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(03)00075-1","article-title":"Clinical breakage, slippage and acceptability of a new commercial polyurethane condom: a randomized, controlled study","volume":"68","author":"Potter","year":"2003","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(00)00097-4","article-title":"Safety and acceptability of a baggy latex condom","volume":"61","author":"Macaluso","year":"2000","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(97)00069-3","article-title":"Latex condom breakage and slippage in a controlled clinical trial","volume":"56","author":"Rosenberg","year":"1997","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970_bib14","first-page":"81","article-title":"Male condom advertising in United States magazines and on the World Wide Web from 1997-2007: implications for media literacy and health literacy","volume":"10","author":"Sofalvi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int Electron J Health Educ"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111548","type":"erratum","label":"Erratum","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,1]],"date-time":"2026-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1793491200000}}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782425001611?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782425001611?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,11]],"date-time":"2026-08-11T19:30:27Z","timestamp":1786476627000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782425001611"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"references-count":14,"alternative-id":["S0010782425001611"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparative performance of ultrathin and standard latex condoms: A randomized multicentre trial","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110970","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"110970"}}