{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T02:37:52Z","timestamp":1792723072861,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2027,1,1]],"date-time":"2027-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1798761600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2027,1,1]],"date-time":"2027-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1798761600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790640000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100004439","name":"William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["2017-6247"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2017-6247"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100004439","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","contraceptionjournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Contraception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2027,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T15:00:06Z","timestamp":1790866806000},"page":"111743","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Did Dobbs impact access to and use of preferred contraception and related outcomes? Quasi-experimental evidence from three states in the US"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"165","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-2186-5332","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mia R.","family":"Zolna","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lauren","family":"Mitchell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9888-4304","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Megan L.","family":"Kavanaugh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib1","unstructured":"Baden K., Dreweke J., Gibson C. Clear and growing evidence that Dobbs is harming reproductive health and freedom [online]. 2024. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/2024\/05\/clear-and-growing-evidence-dobbs-harming-reproductive-health-and-freedom (accessed 16 Sep 2024)."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib2","article-title":"Has the fall of Roe changed contraceptive access and use? New research from four US states offers critical insights","volume":"2","author":"Kavanaugh","year":"2024","journal-title":"Health Aff Sch"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.18620","article-title":"Use of oral and emergency contraceptives after the US Supreme Court\u2019s Dobbs decision","volume":"7","author":"Qato","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2024.110420","article-title":"Increases in retail sales of over-the-counter levonorgestrel emergency contraception in the United States, 2016\u20132022","volume":"134","author":"Wagner","year":"2024","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1001\/jamahealthforum.2024.0424","article-title":"Changes in permanent contraception procedures among young adults following the Dobbs decision","volume":"5","author":"Ellison","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Health Forum"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2024.110471","article-title":"Permanent and long-acting reversible contraception volumes at a multihospital system in Ohio before and after Dobbs","volume":"137","author":"Mitchell","year":"2024","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2024.16862","article-title":"Tubal sterilization rates by state abortion laws after the Dobbs decision","author":"Xu","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1038\/s41443-024-00905-7","article-title":"Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade","author":"Pierson","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.08.722","article-title":"A nationwide assessment of permanent contraception trends in relation to changes in abortion laws","volume":"120","author":"Schardein","year":"2023","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"VandeVusse A., Mueller J., Braccia A., et al. Publicly funded clinics providing contraceptive services in four US states: The disruptions of the \u201cDomestic Gag Rule\u201d and COVID-19 [online]. 2023. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/report\/clinics-providing-services-in-four-us-states-disruptions-of-gag-rule-and-covid-19 (accessed 16 Sep 2024).","DOI":"10.1363\/2023.300323"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib11","first-page":"190","article-title":"The impact of coronavirus on reproduction: Contraceptive access, pregnancy rates, pregnancy delay, and the role of vaccination","volume":"3","author":"Aly","year":"2022","journal-title":"FS Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1007\/s13178-023-00876-2","article-title":"Measuring the relationship between the 2019 Title X Final Rule and patients\u2019 sexual and reproductive health care access and behavior in Iowa using a difference-in-difference approach","volume":"21","author":"Kavanaugh","year":"2024","journal-title":"Sex Res Soc Policy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib13","unstructured":"Frederiksen B., Ranji U., Long M., et al. Contraception in the United States: A closer look at experiences, preferences, and coverage [online]. 2022. https:\/\/www.kff.org\/report-section\/contraception-in-the-united-states-a-closer-look-at-experiences-preferences-and-coverage-findings\/ (accessed 12 Dec 2023)."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.14297","article-title":"Unfulfilled and method-specific contraceptive preferences among reproductive-aged contraceptive users in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin","volume":"59","author":"Kavanaugh","year":"2024","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1111\/sifp.12218","article-title":"Meeting preferences for specific contraceptive methods: An overdue indicator","volume":"54","author":"Burke","year":"2023","journal-title":"Stud Fam Plann"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib16","article-title":"Estimates of use of preferred contraceptive method in the United States: A population-based study","volume":"30","author":"Gomez","year":"2024","journal-title":"Lancet Reg Health Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Olson H., Haas M., Kavanaugh M.L. State-level contraceptive use and preferences: Estimates from the US 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [online]. 2024. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/report\/state-level-contraceptive-use-preferences-estimates-in-us-2022 (accessed 22 Jul 2024).","DOI":"10.1363\/2024.300488"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.02.006","article-title":"Use of nonpreferred contraceptive methods among women in Ohio","volume":"103","author":"Chakraborty","year":"2021","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2022.07.014","article-title":"Exploring financial stress and resource deprivation as barriers to preferred contraceptive use in Wisconsin in 2021","volume":"115","author":"Swan","year":"2022","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1038\/s41443-023-00672-x","article-title":"Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States","volume":"36","author":"Bole","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.6044","article-title":"Contraception usage and workforce trends through 2022","volume":"7","author":"Strasser","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib22","unstructured":"MacDonald-Evoy J. The history of abortion regulations in Arizona [online]. 2024. https:\/\/azmirror.com\/2024\/04\/12\/the-history-of-abortion-regulations-in-arizona\/ (accessed 30 July 2024)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib23","unstructured":"Luthern A. Timeline of abortion rights, lawsuits and access in Wisconsin [online]. 2023. https:\/\/www.jsonline.com\/story\/news\/2023\/09\/18\/a-timeline-of-abortion-access-laws-in-wisconsin\/70866116007\/ (accessed 30 July 2024)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib24","unstructured":"Guttmacher Institute. Interactive map: US abortion policies and access after Roe [online]. https:\/\/states.guttmacher.org\/policies\/ (accessed 22 Jul 2024)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib25","unstructured":"Guttmacher Institute 2023. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/state-policy\/explore\/targeted-regulation-abortion-providers (accessed 2 Aug 2024). Target Regul Abort Provid [Online]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib26","unstructured":"Guttmacher Institute. Reproductive Health Impact Study [online]. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/reproductive-health-impact-study (accessed 2026 Apr 30)."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib27","article-title":"Design and implementation of the Surveys of Women: protocol for an address-based sampling multimodal study","volume":"12","author":"Poland","year":"2023","journal-title":"JMIR Res Protoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssmqr.2025.100532","article-title":"Contraceptive care post-Dobbs: a qualitative study of clinic staff perspectives","volume":"7","author":"VandeVusse","year":"2025","journal-title":"SSM Qual Res Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S518","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2022.306929","article-title":"US Sexual and Reproductive Health Policy: which frameworks are needed now, and next steps forward","volume":"112","author":"Hart","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib30","article-title":"Over-the-counter emergency contraceptive sales before and after Dobbs: a difference-in-difference analysis of US retail data","volume":"4","author":"Abernathy","year":"2026","journal-title":"Health Aff Sch"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib31","first-page":"269","article-title":"Contraceptive use and unfulfilled preferences among women ages 15\u201349 years in the United States, 2022\u20132023","volume":"7","author":"Zolna","year":"2026","journal-title":"F S Rep"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib32","article-title":"Tubal sterilization and vasectomy increased among US Young Adults after the Dobbs Supreme Court decision In 2022","volume":"44","author":"Julia Strasser","year":"2025","journal-title":"Health Aff"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.111210","article-title":"Changes in female permanent contraception at academic medical centers following the Dobbs decision","volume":"153","author":"Pogge","year":"2026","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib34","article-title":"Impact of the Dobbs decision on contraceptive provision: A qualitative study","author":"Cech","year":"2024","journal-title":"Poster Presente Popul Assoc Am Annu Meet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frost J.J., Mueller J., Pleasure Z.H. Trends and differentials in receipt of sexual and reproductive health services in the United States: Services received and sources of care, 2006\u20132019 [online]. 2021. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/report\/sexual-reproductive-health-services-in-us-sources-care-2006-2019 (accessed 22 Jul 2024).","DOI":"10.1363\/2021.33017"}],"container-title":["Contraception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782426003823?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0010782426003823?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T01:50:23Z","timestamp":1792720223000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0010782426003823"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2027,1]]},"references-count":35,"alternative-id":["S0010782426003823"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743","relation":{},"ISSN":["0010-7824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0010-7824","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2027,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Did Dobbs impact access to and use of preferred contraception and related outcomes? Quasi-experimental evidence from three states in the US","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Contraception","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.contraception.2026.111743","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"111743"}}