{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,10]],"date-time":"2025-12-10T17:17:19Z","timestamp":1765387039234,"version":"3.46.0"},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Current Opinion in Psychology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,2]],"date-time":"2025-09-02T15:20:05Z","timestamp":1756826405000},"page":"102160","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["No one sees you quite like I do: The social relations model in personality perception"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"67","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0657-7313","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Vasiliki","family":"Kentrou","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4932-196X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jacek","family":"Buczny","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1080\/10615806.2021.1965995","article-title":"Supportive people evoke positive affect, but do not reduce negative affect, while supportive groups result from favorable dyadic, not group effects","volume":"35","author":"Lakey","year":"2022","journal-title":"Anxiety Stress Coping"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1138","DOI":"10.1177\/19485506211066710","article-title":"Perceiver effects in first impressions reflect generalized stereotypes: evidence of consistency across time, groups, and contexts","volume":"13","author":"Rau","year":"2021","journal-title":"Soc Psychol Personal Sci"},{"year":"2020","author":"Kenny","series-title":"Interpersonal perception: the foundation of social relationships","key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib3"},{"year":"1994","author":"Kenny","series-title":"Interpersonal perceptions: a social relations analysis","key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib4"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib5","article-title":"Relationship-specific (dyadic) humility: how your humility predicts my psychological safety and performance","author":"Lehmann","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Appl Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jrp.2015.07.002","article-title":"Contrasting self-report and consensus ratings of intellectual humility and arrogance","volume":"58","author":"Meagher","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Res Pers"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/S0065-2601(08)60144-6","article-title":"The social relations model","volume":"18","author":"Kenny","year":"1984","journal-title":"Adv Exp Soc Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-6811.2010.01274.x","article-title":"The measurement of reliability of social relations components from round-robin designs","volume":"17","author":"Bonito","year":"2010","journal-title":"Pers Relatsh"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1002\/per.764","article-title":"Lots of target variance: an update of SRM using the HEXACO personality inventory","volume":"24","author":"De Vries","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Pers"},{"year":"2006","author":"Kenny","series-title":"Dyadic data analysis","key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib10"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.116.2.245","article-title":"Consensus in interpersonal perception: acquaintance and the big five","volume":"116","author":"Kenny","year":"1994","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1751-9004.2010.00303.x","article-title":"The social relations model: how to understand dyadic processes","volume":"4","author":"Back","year":"2010","journal-title":"Soc Pers Psychol Compass"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.55.3.387","article-title":"Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance","volume":"55","author":"Albright","year":"1988","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.62.4.645","article-title":"Trait inferences: sources of validity at zero acquaintance","volume":"62","author":"Borkenau","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.62.1.88","article-title":"Consensus at zero acquaintance: replication, behavioral cues, and stability","volume":"62","author":"Kenny","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1111\/jopy.12316","article-title":"Accuracy of self-esteem judgments at zero acquaintance","volume":"86","author":"Hirschmuller","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Pers"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1178","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.65.6.1178","article-title":"Accuracy of behavioral predictions at zero acquaintance: a social relations analysis","volume":"65","author":"Levesque","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"year":"1997","author":"Themanson","series-title":"The effects of gender and perspective on consensus at zero acquaintance","key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib18"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"825","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-6494.2009.00566.x","article-title":"More may be better but there may be too much: optimal trait level and self-enhancement bias","volume":"77","author":"Borkenau","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Pers"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.paid.2016.07.032","article-title":"The personality traits of consensually supportive people","volume":"104","author":"Fles","year":"2017","journal-title":"Pers Indiv Differ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1037\/a0030438","article-title":"Judge, that ye shall be judged: interpersonal judgments of religious characteristics within faith communities","volume":"5","author":"Meagher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Psychol Relig Spiritual"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.56.4.493","article-title":"Agreement on initial impressions: differences due to perceivers, trait dimensions, and target behaviors","volume":"56","author":"Park","year":"1989","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.72.3.604","article-title":"Longitudinal changes in consensus as a function of acquaintance and agreement in liking","volume":"72","author":"Park","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1177\/104649648601700102","article-title":"An interactionist analysis of small group peer assessment","volume":"17","author":"Montgomery","year":"1986","journal-title":"Small Group Behav"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1037\/a0017057","article-title":"Perceiving others' personalities: examining the dimensionality, assumed similarity to the self, and stability of perceiver effects","volume":"98","author":"Srivastava","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1111\/bjep.12049","article-title":"Forecasting the student-professor matches that result in unusually effective teaching","volume":"85","author":"Gross","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Educ Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jrp.2014.06.003","article-title":"A meta-analysis of dependability coefficients (test\u2013retest reliabilities) for measures of the big five","volume":"52","author":"Gnambs","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Res Pers"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib28","article-title":"Personality and social relationships: what do we know and where do we go","volume":"4","author":"Back","year":"2023","journal-title":"Pers Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.paid.2017.01.044","article-title":"Social relations in sensation seeking and urgency: an SRM approach","volume":"111","author":"Quick","year":"2017","journal-title":"Pers Indiv Differ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1111\/jopy.12659","article-title":"The relational regulation of within-person variation in personality expression","volume":"90","author":"Lakey","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Pers"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1080\/10615806.2023.2225034","article-title":"Evidence that specific personal relationships evoke maladaptive personality expression","volume":"37","author":"Lutz","year":"2024","journal-title":"Anxiety Stress Coping"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.5117\/GO2022.2.003.VRIE","article-title":"Ken uzelven: relationele persoonlijkheid op en om het werk [Know thyselves: relational personality at and beyond work]","volume":"35","author":"De Vries","year":"2022","journal-title":"Gedrag Organ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1037\/apl0001059","article-title":"Relationship-specific (dyadic) humility: how your humility predicts my psychological safety and performance","author":"Lehmann","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Appl Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1177\/10944281221134104","article-title":"SRM_R: a web-based shiny app for social relations analyses","volume":"27","author":"Wong","year":"2022","journal-title":"Organ Res Methods"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-011-0150-4","article-title":"TripleR: an R package for social relations analyses based on round-robin designs","volume":"44","author":"Sch\u00f6nbrodt","year":"2012","journal-title":"Behav Res Methods"},{"year":"1998","author":"Kenny","series-title":"Soremo","key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib36"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1002\/per.811","article-title":"PERSOC: a unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships","volume":"25","author":"Back","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Pers"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1177\/08902070211044552","article-title":"The extended social relations model: understanding dissimilation and dissensus in the judgment of others","volume":"37","author":"Kenny","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Pers"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1497","DOI":"10.1111\/jopy.12906","article-title":"Who makes a more consistent first impression? Examining the structure and correlates of dissensus","volume":"92","author":"Long","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Pers"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.1111\/jopy.12893","article-title":"Individual differences in dissimilation: do some people make more distinctions among targets' personalities than others?","volume":"92","author":"Carlson","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Pers"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib41","series-title":"24th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction, ICMI 2022","first-page":"679","article-title":"Designing hybrid intelligence techniques for facilitating collaboration informed by social science","author":"Hrkalovic","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib42","article-title":"Partner perceptions during brief online interactions shape partner selection and cooperation","volume":"20","author":"Hrkalovic","year":"2025","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib43","article-title":"The social-relations model for asymmetric-block-design data: a tutorial with R","volume":"8","author":"Kluger","year":"2025","journal-title":"Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.3102\/10769986211056541","article-title":"Analyzing longitudinal social relations model data using the social relations structural equation model","volume":"47","author":"Nestler","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Educ Behav Stat"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1162","DOI":"10.1007\/s11336-016-9546-5","article-title":"Tackling longitudinal round-robin data: a social relations growth model","volume":"82","author":"Nestler","year":"2017","journal-title":"Psychometrika"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1093\/jrsssa\/qnad115","article-title":"A dynamic social relations model for clustered longitudinal dyadic data with continuous or ordinal responses","volume":"187","author":"Pillinger","year":"2024","journal-title":"J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib47","series-title":"2023 ASEE annual conference & exposition proceedings","article-title":"A bayesian approach to longitudinal social relations model","author":"Xu","year":"2023"},{"unstructured":"In this study, the authors modeled mediation processes involving relationship-specific expressed humility, psychological safety, and perceived job performance, all of which showed substantial relationship variance (29%, 45%, and 35%, respectively). Expressed humility was positively related to performance (interpersonal correlation) and psychological safety (intrapersonal correlation). A full mediation was observed, with humility affecting performance via psychological safety. When one coworker expresses unique humility toward another (e.g., by acknowledging their strengths and contributions or modelling teachability), the other feels uniquely psychologically safe in that coworker's presence and consequently performs better when working with them. These findings highlight that relationship effects, although rarely considered, explain a substantial amount of variance in people's behaviour at work.","key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib48"},{"unstructured":"The authors applied relational regulation theory (RRT) to study the expression of maladaptive personality. Participants were asked to rate their expression of maladaptive personality dimensions when thinking about or interacting with important members of their social network (family members and closest peers). Although the expression of maladaptive personality was highly consistent across network members (particularly the expression of negative affectivity), significant relationship-specific effects also emerged for each personality dimension (particularly the expression of antagonism and disinhibition). Individuals thus varied in their expression of maladaptive personality depending on which network members they were with or thinking about. Respondents expressed more maladaptive personality towards network members who were perceived as less supportive (median correlation of \u2212.39) and responsive (\u2212.33), and as evoking conflict (.49), attachment anxiety (.31), and attachment avoidance (.29).","key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib49"},{"unstructured":"The authors introduce the extended SRM (eSRM) to allow modelling of individual-level variability in how perceivers and targets utilize each SRM component. The eSRM indexes individual differences in consensus (dissensus) and assimilation (dissimilation). Dissensus is further decomposed into a target's tendency to be viewed in a way that converges with perceivers' effects (prototypicality) and the tendency to be viewed in a way that diverges from perceiver's effects in ways that are unique to a particular target (volatility). Dissimilation is further decomposed into a perceiver's tendency to make distinctions among targets that other perceivers also make (sensitivity) and the tendency to make distinctions among targets that is unique to that particular perceiver (differentiation).","key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib50"},{"unstructured":"In three studies involving perceivers rating target photographs on various personality traits, the authors utilize the eSRM to investigate the structure, sources, and correlates of dissensus across traits. Dissensus was substantially consistent across different traits, suggesting that it is likely a stable characteristic driven by properties of the target. Dissensus also showed a negative association with target expressiveness, attractiveness, liking, and normativity. Certain \u2018good targets\u2019 thus facilitate consensus by providing information of higher quantity and quality, preventing perceivers from having to rely on their idiosyncratic assumptions to form judgments of these targets' personalities. Dissensus was primarily driven by volatility, which emerged when a target provided ambiguous information, causing perceivers to diverge both from one another's judgments and from their own perceiver effects.","key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib51"},{"unstructured":"In two studies involving perceivers rating target photographs on Big Five traits, the authors utilize the eSRM and demonstrate significant individual differences in dissimilation that are consistent across personality traits. Differentiation was highly consistent across traits, suggesting that the tendency to form more idiosyncratic distinctions of targets likely represents an individual-level interpersonal style that broadly filters perceivers' judgments across traits. Perceivers higher in social anxiety and lower in emotional stability and self-esteem demonstrated greater differentiation. Sensitivity was greater in perceivers lower in extraversion, narcissism, and self-esteem. Those perceivers made distinctions across targets that were more consistent with other perceivers (i.e., showed greater sensitivity).","key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160_bib52"}],"container-title":["Current Opinion in Psychology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2352250X25001733?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2352250X25001733?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,10]],"date-time":"2025-12-10T17:12:59Z","timestamp":1765386779000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2352250X25001733"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"references-count":52,"alternative-id":["S2352250X25001733"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160","relation":{},"ISSN":["2352-250X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2352-250X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"No one sees you quite like I do: The social relations model in personality perception","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Current Opinion in Psychology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2025.102160","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"102160"}}