{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]],"date-time":"2026-09-04T22:15:16Z","timestamp":1788560116390,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2027,2,1]],"date-time":"2027-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1801440000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2027,2,1]],"date-time":"2027-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1801440000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Current Opinion in Psychology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2027,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T23:38:43Z","timestamp":1787787523000},"page":"102419","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Negotiation impasses as meaningful outcomes: How AI is changing the cost structure of walking away"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"73","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3529-9463","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Martin","family":"Schweinsberg","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefan","family":"Thau","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Madan M.","family":"Pillutla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib1","series-title":"Negotiating rationally","author":"Bazerman","year":"1992"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib2","series-title":"Getting to YES","author":"Fisher","year":"1981"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib3","series-title":"The art and science of negotiating","author":"Raiffa","year":"1982"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1016\/0749-5978(90)90048-E","article-title":"Social perception in negotiation","volume":"47","author":"Thompson","year":"1990","journal-title":"Organ Behav Hum Decis Process"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.51.1.279","article-title":"Negotiation","volume":"51","author":"Bazerman","year":"2000","journal-title":"Annu Rev Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib6","first-page":"49","article-title":"Negotiation impasses: types, causes, and resolutions","volume":"48","author":"Schweinsberg","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Manag"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-psych-033020-014116","article-title":"Embracing complexity: a review of negotiation research","volume":"74","author":"Boothby","year":"2023","journal-title":"Annu Rev Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib8","series-title":"Handbook of social psychology","article-title":"Negotiation","author":"Schweitzer","year":"2025"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib9","series-title":"A behavioral theory of labor negotiations","author":"Walton","year":"1965"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib10","series-title":"Social conflict: escalation, stalemate, and settlement","author":"Pruitt","year":"1986"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.1037\/apl0001138","article-title":"Asking for less (but receiving more): women avoid impasses and outperform men when negotiators have weak alternatives","volume":"109","author":"Ma","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Appl Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.2307\/1884852","article-title":"A behavioral model of rational choice","volume":"69","author":"Simon","year":"1955","journal-title":"Q J Econ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib13","series-title":"Organizations","author":"March","year":"1958"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib14","series-title":"Negotiation behavior","author":"Pruitt","year":"1981"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib15","article-title":"In U.S. eyes, \u201cgood\u201d Muslims and \u201cbad\u201d Serbs did a switch","author":"Sciolino","year":"1995","journal-title":"N Y Times"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib16","article-title":"A deep dive into distributive concession making and the likelihood of impasses in negotiations","volume":"9","author":"Mertes","year":"2023","journal-title":"Collabra: Psychology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1109\/TAFFC.2023.3285931","article-title":"Teaching reverse appraisal to improve negotiation skills","volume":"15","author":"Sato","year":"2024","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Affective Comput"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.obhdp.2024.104319","article-title":"But what if I lose the offer? Negotiators\u2019 inflated perception of their likelihood of jeopardizing a deal","volume":"181","author":"Hart","year":"2024","journal-title":"Organ Behav Hum Decis Process"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1111\/nejo.12423","article-title":"Low power, first offers, and reservation prices: weak negotiators are self-anchored by their own alternatives","volume":"39","author":"Maaravi","year":"2023","journal-title":"Negot J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib20","unstructured":"Shah C, Agarwal A, Garg K, Heddaya M. LLM rationalis? Measuring bargaining capabilities of AI negotiators 2025. [Preprint]. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/ARXIV.2512.13063."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib21","series-title":"For what it's worth: humans overwrite their economic self-interest to avoid bargaining with AI systems. CHI conference on human factors in computing systems","first-page":"1","author":"Erlei","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib22","first-page":"1303","volume":"vol. 34","author":"Kitadai","year":"2025"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib23","series-title":"How does AI distribute the pie? Large language models and the ultimatum game","author":"Araujo","year":"2026"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib24","series-title":"Evaluating behavioral alignment in conflict dialogue: a multi-dimensional comparison of LLM agents and humans. Proceedings of the 2025 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing","first-page":"16366","author":"Kwon","year":"2025"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib25","series-title":"Measuring bargaining abilities of LLMs: a benchmark and a buyer-enhancement method. Findings of the association for computational linguistics ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting","first-page":"3579","author":"Xia","year":"2024"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib26","unstructured":"Sinha S, Kumar H, Mandapati AR, Sakhuja R, Kumar D. The language of bargaining: linguistic effects in LLM negotiations 2026. [Preprint]. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/ARXIV.2601.04387."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2521774123","article-title":"Advancing AI negotiations: a large-scale autonomous negotiation competition","volume":"123","author":"Vaccaro","year":"2026","journal-title":"Proc Natl Acad Sci USA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib28","series-title":"ASTRA: a negotiation agent with adaptive and strategic reasoning via tool-integrated action for dynamic offer optimization. Proceedings of the 2025 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing","first-page":"16228","author":"Kwon","year":"2025"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib29","series-title":"ASTRO: automatic strategy optimization for non-cooperative dialogues. Findings of the association for computational linguistics: ACL 2025","first-page":"388","author":"Hu","year":"2025"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib30","unstructured":"Across eight studies, including Shark Tank pitches where women reached impasse 40% of the time versus 48% for men, incorporating the economic costs of impasse into performance measures reverses the standard male advantage in distributive negotiation when alternatives are weak. Whether assertive behavior helps or hurts depends on the cost structure around non-agreement and this is exactly the variable AI most directly reshapes."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib31","unstructured":"Training negotiators to infer counterpart preferences from emotional expressions improved partner-model accuracy but not integrative outcomes. The dissociation shows that AI's analytical gains do not automatically translate into better deals."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib32","unstructured":"In Ultimatum Games, LLMs with stronger reasoning behaved closer to a strict reservation-point logic than weaker-reasoning models. Reasoning capacity is therefore a lever pushing AI bargaining toward harder forced impasses, in tension with alignment training pressures."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib33","unstructured":"Demonstrates that alignment training can shift LLM bargaining toward over-accommodation, directly qualifying predictions of uniformly harder AI reservation behavior."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib34","unstructured":"In matched simulations of a multi-issue commercial dispute, impasse rates across four personality-prompted LLM dyads ranged from \u223c0 for Claude-3.7-Sonnet to 0.53 for Gemini-2.0-Flash, with GPT-4.1 variants in between and humans at 0.13. Model choice alone reshapes the distribution of agreements versus breakdowns at a scale dwarfing typical between-condition effects in human dispute studies."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib35","unstructured":"A prompt-based buyer-enhancement method moved AI\u2013AI deal rates from 27% to 89% in a multi-turn benchmark. The shift, larger than typical between-model differences, indicates AI\u2013AI impasse rates are downstream of scaffolding rather than model capability."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib36","unstructured":"In LLM negotiations, the language of bargaining instructions affected agreement rates more than model choice. The result reframes AI negotiation behavior as partly a property of the linguistic surface on which models were trained and prompted."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419_bib37","unstructured":"In an international competition producing over 180,000 autonomous AI\u2013AI negotiations, warmth-associated language predicted deals and value while dominance-associated behavior predicted impasses."}],"container-title":["Current Opinion in Psychology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2352250X26001570?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2352250X26001570?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,4]],"date-time":"2026-09-04T21:39:26Z","timestamp":1788557966000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2352250X26001570"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2027,2]]},"references-count":37,"alternative-id":["S2352250X26001570"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419","relation":{},"ISSN":["2352-250X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2352-250X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2027,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Negotiation impasses as meaningful outcomes: How AI is changing the cost structure of walking away","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Current Opinion in Psychology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2026.102419","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"102419"}}