{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]],"date-time":"2026-06-15T13:48:26Z","timestamp":1781531306691,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,11,1]],"date-time":"2013-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1383264000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,11,1]],"date-time":"2013-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1383264000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalradiologyonline.net","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Clinical Radiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,10]],"date-time":"2013-07-10T08:00:30Z","timestamp":1373443230000},"page":"1107-1113","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":33,"title":["MRI is highly specific in determining primary cervical versus endometrial cancer when biopsy results are inconclusive"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"68","author":[{"given":"H.","family":"He","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P.","family":"Bhosale","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"W.","family":"Wei","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P.","family":"Ramalingam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Iyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib1","first-page":"69","article-title":"Global cancer statistics","volume":"61","author":"Jemal","year":"2011","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1097\/RCT.0b013e31818d4279","article-title":"Magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial carcinoma","volume":"33","author":"Peungjesada","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Comput Assist Tomogr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib3","series-title":"Uterine cancer: screening, diagnosis, and treatment","first-page":"51","article-title":"Uterine cancer: pathology","author":"Soslow","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1097\/00130404-200309000-00003","article-title":"Pathology of cervical cancer","volume":"9","author":"Silverberg","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cancer J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.232025065","article-title":"MR imaging of the uterine cervix: imaging\u2013pathologic correlation","volume":"23","author":"Okamoto","year":"2003","journal-title":"RadioGraphics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e31819617f1","article-title":"Imaging of cervical pathology","volume":"52","author":"Rezvani","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.20064","article-title":"Cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma incidence trends among white women and black women in the United States for 1976\u20132000","volume":"100","author":"Wang","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0215(19980209)75:4<536::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-U","article-title":"International trends in the incidence of cervical cancer: I. Adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinomas","volume":"75","author":"Vizcaino","year":"1998","journal-title":"Int J Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1097\/PAS.0b013e3181e3291e","article-title":"A panel of 3 markers including p16, ProExC, or HPV ISH is optimal for distinguishing between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas","volume":"34","author":"Kong","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Surg Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1097\/00004347-200201000-00003","article-title":"A panel of immunohistochemical stains, including carcinoembryonic antigen, vimentin, and estrogen receptor, aids the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas","volume":"21","author":"McCluggage","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1097\/00004347-200201000-00002","article-title":"Distinction between endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma: an immunohistochemical study","volume":"21","author":"Castrillon","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1097\/00004347-200207000-00003","article-title":"Immunohistochemical staining in the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas: another viewpoint","volume":"21","author":"Kamoi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"998","DOI":"10.1097\/00000478-200208000-00004","article-title":"Hormone receptor immunohistochemistry and human papillomavirus in situ hybridization are useful for distinguishing endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas","volume":"26","author":"Staebler","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Surg Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib14","first-page":"1313","article-title":"Comparison between adenocarcinoma in both endocervical and endometrial specimens from fractional curettage and pathologic findings in subsequent hysterectomy specimens","volume":"91","author":"Tantbirojn","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(80)91024-8","article-title":"Prognosis and treatment of endometrial cancer","volume":"136","author":"Berman","year":"1980","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2312021184","article-title":"Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning","volume":"231","author":"Manfredi","year":"2004","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2006.03.011","article-title":"Imaging of endometrial adenocarcinoma","volume":"61","author":"Barwick","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1111\/IGC.0b013e31819c52de","article-title":"Magnetic resonance imaging in gynecological oncology","volume":"19","author":"Harry","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1016\/S0033-8338(08)76332-X","article-title":"MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix [In Spanish]","volume":"50","author":"Sala","year":"2008","journal-title":"Radiologia"},{"issue":"419","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib20","first-page":"e411","article-title":"Optimizing the management of stage II endometrial cancer: the role of radical hysterectomy and radiation","volume":"200","author":"Wright","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10101147","article-title":"The value of MR imaging when the site of uterine cancer origin is uncertain","volume":"258","author":"Vargas","year":"2011","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.215.1.r00ap3945","article-title":"Use of preoperative MR imaging in the management of endometrial carcinoma: cost analysis","volume":"215","author":"Hardesty","year":"2000","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.198.2.8596840","article-title":"Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up\u2014cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis","volume":"198","author":"Hricak","year":"1996","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib24","first-page":"43","article-title":"Adenocarcinoma involving the uterine cervix: magnetic resonance imaging findings in tumours of endometrial, compared with cervical, origin","volume":"57","author":"Haider","year":"2006","journal-title":"Can Assoc Radiol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib25","first-page":"1344","article-title":"Limited utility of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the primary site of disease in patients with inconclusive endometrial biopsy","volume":"20","author":"Ramirez","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.158.3.1738995","article-title":"Myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: assessment by MR imaging","volume":"158","author":"Sironi","year":"1992","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"}],"container-title":["Clinical Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0009926013002900?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0009926013002900?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,14]],"date-time":"2025-09-14T16:27:16Z","timestamp":1757867236000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0009926013002900"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0009926013002900"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095","relation":{},"ISSN":["0009-9260"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0009-9260","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"MRI is highly specific in determining primary cervical versus endometrial cancer when biopsy results are inconclusive","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Clinical Radiology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.crad.2013.05.095","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2013 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}