{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T04:01:09Z","timestamp":1785556869933,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]],"date-time":"2017-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1483228800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]],"date-time":"2017-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1483228800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"Siemens Healthcare Ltd"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalradiologyonline.net","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Clinical Radiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,13]],"date-time":"2016-10-13T04:47:14Z","timestamp":1476334034000},"page":"95.e9-95.e15","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Clinical performance of Siemens digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard supplementary mammography for the assessment of screen-detected soft-tissue abnormalities: a multi-reader study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"72","author":[{"given":"P.","family":"Whelehan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.H.","family":"Heywang-K\u00f6brunner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.J.","family":"Vinnicombe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Hacker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"J\u00e4nsch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Hapca","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Gray","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Jenkin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K.","family":"Lowry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Oeppen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Reilly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Stahnke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Evans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1053\/crad.2001.0662","article-title":"False-negative breast screening assessment. What lessons can we learn?","volume":"56","author":"Burrell","year":"2001","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1258\/0969141042467395","article-title":"An audit of assessment procedures in women who develop breast cancer after a negative result","volume":"11","author":"Warren","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Med Screen"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib3","series-title":"Clinical Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening Assessment","year":"2010"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2013.01.017","article-title":"Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection","volume":"22","author":"Houssami","year":"2013","journal-title":"Breast"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12446","article-title":"Suspicious findings at digital breast tomosynthesis occult to conventional digital mammography: imaging features and pathology findings","volume":"21","author":"Ray","year":"2015","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.12.8881","article-title":"Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting","volume":"200","author":"Brandt","year":"2013","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"W172","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.09.3244","article-title":"Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: a subjective side-by-side review","volume":"195","author":"Hakim","year":"2010","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2014.06.005","article-title":"The accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with coned compression magnification mammography in the assessment of abnormalities found on mammography","volume":"69","author":"Morel","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.11101763","article-title":"Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization","volume":"262","author":"Noroozian","year":"2012","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-011-2305-1","article-title":"One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis","volume":"22","author":"Tagliafico","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12120552","article-title":"Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions","volume":"266","author":"Zuley","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib12","series-title":"Technical evaluation of Hologic Selenia Dimensions digital breast tomosynthesis system: NHSBSP Equipment Report 1307, Version 2","author":"Strudley","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib13","series-title":"Technical evaluation of GE Healthcare SenoClaire digital breast tomosynthesis system: NHS Breast Screening Programme Equipment Report 1404","author":"Strudley","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib14","series-title":"Technical evaluation of Siemens Mammomat Inspiration digital breast tomosynthesis system: NHSBSP Equipment Report 1306, version 2","author":"Strudley","year":"2015"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejmp.2016.05.001","article-title":"Evaluation of the technical performance of three different commercial digital breast tomosynthesis systems in the clinical environment","volume":"32","author":"Rodr\u00edguez-Ruiz","year":"2016","journal-title":"Phys Med"},{"issue":"1058","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20150735","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20150735","article-title":"Accuracy of GE digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplementary mammographic views for diagnosis of screen-detected soft-tissue breast lesions","volume":"89","author":"Cornford","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib17","series-title":"European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis","author":"Perry","year":"2006"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2015.08.012","article-title":"Radiologists' interpretive efficiency and variability in true- and false-positive detection when screen-reading with tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) relative to standard mammography in population screening","volume":"24","author":"Svahn","year":"2015","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib19","first-page":"1","article-title":"False positives in breast cancer screening with one-view breast tomosynthesis: an analysis of findings leading to recall, work-up and biopsy rates in the Malm\u00f6 Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial","author":"L\u00e5ng","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12121373","article-title":"Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program","volume":"267","author":"Skaane","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1177\/0969141313499147","article-title":"The effect of false positive breast screening examinations on subsequent attendance: retrospective cohort study","volume":"20","author":"Maxwell","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Med Screen"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3409-1","article-title":"Effect of radiologists\u2019 experience on breast cancer detection and localization using digital breast tomosynthesis","volume":"25","author":"Alakhras","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2014.10.022","article-title":"Added value of one-view breast tomosynthesis combined with digital mammography according to reader experience","volume":"84","author":"Thomassin-Naggara","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2015.11.008","article-title":"Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool","volume":"71","author":"Gilbert","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"issue":"16","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1784","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.1708","article-title":"Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis and digital mammography in dense and nondense breasts","volume":"315","author":"Rafferty","year":"2016","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/j.diii.2014.06.010","article-title":"The role of tomosynthesis in breast cancer staging in 75 patients","volume":"96","author":"Mercier","year":"2015","journal-title":"Diagn Interv Imaging"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1254","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.07.006","article-title":"Assessment of extent of breast cancer: comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography","volume":"68","author":"Mun","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1177\/0284185113503636","article-title":"Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens","volume":"55","author":"Seo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"issue":"1055","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20150353","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20150353","article-title":"Digital breast tomosynthesis at screening assessment: are two views always necessary?","volume":"88","author":"Haq","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3803-3","article-title":"Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malm\u00f6 Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study","volume":"26","author":"L\u00e5ng","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"}],"container-title":["Clinical Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0009926016303452?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0009926016303452?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,2]],"date-time":"2025-11-02T20:11:17Z","timestamp":1762114277000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0009926016303452"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S0009926016303452"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011","relation":{},"ISSN":["0009-9260"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0009-9260","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Clinical performance of Siemens digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard supplementary mammography for the assessment of screen-detected soft-tissue abnormalities: a multi-reader study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Clinical Radiology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.crad.2016.08.011","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}