{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,29]],"date-time":"2026-08-29T09:05:36Z","timestamp":1787994336415,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":69,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]],"date-time":"2020-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601510400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]],"date-time":"2020-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601510400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalradiologyonline.net","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Clinical Radiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,2]],"date-time":"2020-03-02T07:53:02Z","timestamp":1583135582000},"page":"794.e1-794.e6","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["The roles of clinical audit and test sets in promoting the quality of breast screening: a scoping review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"75","author":[{"given":"B.A.","family":"Qenam","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K.","family":"Tapia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P.C.","family":"Brennan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-16-0858","article-title":"Global cancer in women: burden and trends","volume":"26","author":"Torre","year":"2017","journal-title":"Canc Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib2","first-page":"394","article-title":"Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries","volume":"68","author":"Bray","year":"2018","journal-title":"CA Canc J Clin"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib3","series-title":"National accreditation standards. Department of Health and Ageing","first-page":"211","year":"2018"},{"issue":"24","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2353","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsr1504363","article-title":"Breast-cancer screening\u2014viewpoint of the IARC working group","volume":"372","author":"Lauby-Secretan","year":"2015","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"17","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3106","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.28174","article-title":"Breast cancer mortality in participants of the Norwegian breast cancer screening program","volume":"119","author":"Hofvind","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1097\/01.cej.0000195713.02567.36","article-title":"Performance measures from 10 years of breast screening in the Ontario breast screening program, 1990\/91 to 2000","volume":"15","author":"Chiarelli","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Canc Prev"},{"issue":"7262","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.321.7262.665","article-title":"Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality","volume":"321","author":"Blanks","year":"2000","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"830","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2333031484","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer","volume":"233","author":"Berg","year":"2004","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib9","series-title":"BreastScreen Australia monitoring report","first-page":"18","year":"2018"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2411051504","article-title":"Performance benchmarks for screening mammography","volume":"241","author":"Rosenberg","year":"2006","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10091636","article-title":"Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography","volume":"255","author":"Carney","year":"2010","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2251011667","article-title":"Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations","volume":"225","author":"Kolb","year":"2002","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.03.001","article-title":"Missed breast cancer: what can we learn?","volume":"45","author":"Wadhwa","year":"2016","journal-title":"Curr Probab Diagn Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib14","series-title":"National audit of breast cancer in older patients: 2018 annual report","author":"Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (UK)","year":"2018"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1177\/0969141315610790","article-title":"Audit feedback on reading performance of screening mammograms: an international comparison","volume":"23","author":"Hofvind","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Med Screen"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"752","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2010.02.010","article-title":"Radiologists' attitudes and use of mammography audit reports","volume":"17","author":"Elmore","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib17","series-title":"Seminars in breast disease","first-page":"123","article-title":"BreastScreen Australia: how we handle variability in interpretive skills","author":"Kossoff","year":"2003"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib18","series-title":"Seminars in breast disease","first-page":"148","article-title":"PERFORMS: a self-assessment scheme for radiologists in\u00a0breast screening","author":"Gale","year":"2003"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib19","series-title":"International workshop on digital mammography","first-page":"438","article-title":"BREAST: a novel strategy to improve the\u00a0detection of breast cancer","author":"Brennan","year":"2014"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2533082308","article-title":"Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists\u2019 characteristics associated with accuracy","volume":"253","author":"Elmore","year":"2009","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13122581","article-title":"Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings","volume":"269","author":"Rawashdeh","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.1998.7.443","article-title":"Does diagnostic accuracy in mammography depend on radiologists' experience?","volume":"7","author":"Elmore","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Wom Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"W456","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.05.1858","article-title":"A portrait of breast imaging specialists and of the interpretation of mammography in the United States","volume":"187","author":"Lewis","year":"2006","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roetngenol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.05.1581","article-title":"Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography in a community practice: are there differences between specialists and general radiologists?","volume":"188","author":"Leung","year":"2007","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roetngenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib25","series-title":"New principles of best practice in clinical audit","author":"Burgess","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib26","series-title":"Seminars in breast disease","first-page":"108","article-title":"Interpretive skills in the national health Service breast screening programme: performance indicators and remedial measures","author":"Perry","year":"2003"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib27","series-title":"Seminars in roentgenology","first-page":"211","article-title":"Auditing your breast imaging practice: an evidence-based approach","author":"Sickles","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib28","series-title":"ACR BI-RADS\u00ae follow-up and outcome monitoring","article-title":"ACR BI-RADS\u00ae Atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system","author":"Sickles","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib29","series-title":"ACR BI-RADS atlas: breast imaging reporting and data system","author":"D'Orsi","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijmedinf.2017.03.003","article-title":"Making electronic health records support quality management: a narrative review","volume":"104","author":"Triantafillou","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Med Inform"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2017.12.012","article-title":"Role of performance metrics in breast screening imaging: where are we and where should we be?","volume":"73","author":"Cohen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2011.09.010","article-title":"The challenge of assessing reader performance in mammography","volume":"67","author":"Brennan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2016.05.034","article-title":"Multilevel factors associated with long-term adherence to screening mammography in older women in the US","volume":"89","author":"Hubbard","year":"2016","journal-title":"Prev Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1525-1497.2002.10431.x","article-title":"Adherence of low-income women to cancer screening recommendations","volume":"17","author":"O\u2019Malley","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semnuclmed.2011.07.001","article-title":"New developments in observer performance methodology in medical imaging","volume":"41","author":"Chakraborty","year":"2011","journal-title":"Semin Nucl Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"854","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.07.2812","article-title":"Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms","volume":"190","author":"Gromet","year":"2008","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roetngenol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1534","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-014-2913-y","article-title":"Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care","volume":"29","author":"Ivers","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib38","first-page":"26","article-title":"Benchmarking and audit of breast units improves quality of care","volume":"5","author":"Van Dam","year":"2013","journal-title":"Facts Views Vis Ob-Gyn"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.08.2051","article-title":"Best ways to provide feedback to radiologists on mammography performance","volume":"193","author":"Bowles","year":"2009","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roetngenol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib40","article-title":"Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes","volume":"6","author":"Ivers","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"970","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.11.6988","article-title":"Association between time spent interpreting, level of confidence, and accuracy of screening mammography","volume":"198","author":"Carney","year":"2012","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roetngenol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-013-3018-4","article-title":"Experiences with a self-test for Dutch breast screening radiologists: lessons learnt","volume":"24","author":"Timmers","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2520","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-4074-8","article-title":"Cross-national comparison of screening mammography accuracy measures in US, Norway, and Spain","volume":"26","author":"Domingo","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djt461","article-title":"Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program","volume":"106","author":"Th\u00e9berge","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Natl Canc Inst"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"W586","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.13.11147","article-title":"Educational interventions to improve screening mammography interpretation: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"202","author":"Geller","year":"2014","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roetngenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S127","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/25049149","article-title":"Breast screening: PERFORMS identifies key mammographic training needs","volume":"79","author":"Scott","year":"2006","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib47","series-title":"The handbook of medical image perception and techniques","first-page":"328","article-title":"Performance assessment using standardized data sets: the PERFORMS scheme in breast screening and other domains","author":"Chen","year":"2018"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e341","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2018.12.017","article-title":"Improvement of cancer detection on mammograms via BREAST test sets","volume":"26","author":"Trieu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib49","series-title":"Reporting breast imaging. Breast imaging: a guide for practice","first-page":"49","year":"2002"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib50","series-title":"Medical imaging 2016: image perception, observer performance, and technology assessment.","article-title":"Investigating the link between the radiological experience and the allocation of an'equivocal finding","author":"Rawashdeh","year":"2016"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1117\/1.JMI.1.1.015503","article-title":"Number of mammography cases read per year is a strong predictor of sensitivity","volume":"1","author":"Suleiman","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Med Imag"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1386","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2014.06.013","article-title":"How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns","volume":"21","author":"Mousa","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/94.5.369","article-title":"Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships","volume":"94","author":"Esserman","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Natl Canc Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib54","series-title":"Medical imaging 2014: image perception, observer performance, and technology assessment: international society for optics and photonics","article-title":"A comparison of Australian and USA radiologists' performance in detection of breast cancer","author":"Suleiman","year":"2014"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"881","DOI":"10.1007\/s00038-015-0740-5","article-title":"Breast cancer screening in England and the United States: a comparison of provision and utilisation","volume":"60","author":"Williams","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Publ Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2018.03.003","article-title":"Observer variability in breast cancer diagnosis between countries with and without breast screening","volume":"26","author":"Demchig","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.1111\/1754-9485.12461","article-title":"Impact of breast reader assessment strategy on mammographic radiologists' test reading performance","volume":"60","author":"Suleiman","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Med Imag Radiat Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1257\/jep.21.2.153","article-title":"What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?","volume":"21","author":"Levitt","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Econ Perspect"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1155\/2013\/619767","article-title":"A comparison of field-based and lab-based experiments to evaluate user experience of personalised mobile devices","volume":"2013","author":"Sun","year":"2013","journal-title":"Adv Hum Comput Interact"},{"issue":"5952","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1168244","article-title":"Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences","volume":"326","author":"Falk","year":"2009","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1037\/0003-066X.38.4.379","article-title":"In Defense of external invalidity","volume":"38","author":"Mook","year":"1983","journal-title":"Am Psychol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2012.02.007","article-title":"Assessing reader performance in radiology, an imperfect science: lessons from breast screening","volume":"67","author":"Soh","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2491072025","article-title":"The \u201claboratory\u201d effect: comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations","volume":"249","author":"Gur","year":"2008","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1256","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2017.03.016","article-title":"Correlation between screening mammography interpretive performance on a test set and performance in clinical practice","volume":"24","author":"Miglioretti","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"issue":"21","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1752","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1996.03540210060035","article-title":"Context bias: a problem in diagnostic radiology","volume":"276","author":"Egglin","year":"1996","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13122399","article-title":"Screening mammography: test set data can reasonably describe actual clinical reporting","volume":"268","author":"Soh","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib67","series-title":"Medical imaging 2009: image perception, observer performance, and technology assessment: international Society for Optics and Photonics","article-title":"The relationship between real life breast screening and an annual self assessment scheme","author":"Scott","year":"2009"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(99)00218-8","article-title":"Assessing mammographers' accuracy: a comparison of clinical and test performance","volume":"53","author":"Rutter","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1111\/1754-9485.12301","article-title":"Certain performance values arising from mammographic test set readings correlate well with clinical audit","volume":"59","author":"Soh","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Med Imag Radiat Oncol"}],"container-title":["Clinical Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0009926020300519?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0009926020300519?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,14]],"date-time":"2025-09-14T16:41:49Z","timestamp":1757868109000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0009926020300519"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"references-count":69,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0009926020300519"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015","relation":{},"ISSN":["0009-9260"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0009-9260","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The roles of clinical audit and test sets in promoting the quality of breast screening: a scoping review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Clinical Radiology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.crad.2020.01.015","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}