{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,30]],"date-time":"2026-10-30T01:41:45Z","timestamp":1793324505337,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,3]],"date-time":"2025-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735862400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["thelancet.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["eClinicalMedicine"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,21]],"date-time":"2025-01-21T14:17:46Z","timestamp":1737469066000},"page":"103071","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Inter-pregnancy interval and uterine rupture during a trial of labour after one previous caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births: a retrospective population-based cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"80","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-8661-5459","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pejman","family":"Adily","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Travis","family":"Bettison","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-0286-9437","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mark","family":"Lauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rajit","family":"Narayan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adam","family":"Mackie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hala","family":"Phipps","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vincenzo","family":"Berghella","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marjan M.","family":"Haghighi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Katelyn","family":"Perren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"George","family":"Johnson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bradley","family":"de Vries","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib2","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2021","volume":"72","author":"Osterman","year":"2023","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"909","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13816","article-title":"Cesarean delivery: trend in indications over three decades within a major city hospital network","volume":"99","author":"Morton","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib5","article-title":"Frequency of caesarean section classified by robson's ten group classification system: a scoping review","volume":"15","author":"Jiandani","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib6","series-title":"Green-top Guideline No. 45. Birth after previous caesarean birth","year":"2015"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e110","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"133","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"25","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1180","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109046","article-title":"Association of interpregnancy interval with uterine scar failure in labor: a case-control study","volume":"183","author":"Esposito","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib10","first-page":"175","article-title":"Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture","volume":"97","author":"Shipp","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1199","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127138","article-title":"Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture","volume":"187","author":"Bujold","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"Landon","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1075","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000286759.49895.46","article-title":"Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"110","author":"Stamilio","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1003","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d992fb","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months","volume":"115","author":"Bujold","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"17","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2848","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1671343","article-title":"Influence of interpregnancy interval on uterine rupture","volume":"34","author":"Cunningham","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib16","first-page":"41","article-title":"Interdelivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"99","author":"Huang","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1003","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.765854","article-title":"Is there an association between short interval from previous cesarean section and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcome?","volume":"26","author":"Kessous","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-023-05600-x","article-title":"Association between interpregnancy interval and maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in women with a cesarean delivery: a population-based study","volume":"23","author":"Dong","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"992","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.11.008","article-title":"No. 382-Trial of labour after caesarean","volume":"41","author":"Dy","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib20","series-title":"Birth after previous caesarean section. Best Practice Statement","year":"2019"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001891","article-title":"Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes: an analysis of successive pregnancies","volume":"129","author":"Hanley","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2018.12.002","article-title":"Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse pregnancy outcomes by maternal age in the United States","volume":"31","author":"Haight","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Epidemiol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1661","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2018.4696","article-title":"Association of short interpregnancy interval with pregnancy outcomes according to maternal age","volume":"178","author":"Schummers","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70317-0","article-title":"Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries","volume":"181","author":"Caughey","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"345","author":"Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"7462","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38160.634352.55","article-title":"Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after caesarean section: retrospective cohort study","volume":"329","author":"Smith","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.045","article-title":"Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?","volume":"195","author":"Cahill","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.x","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study","volume":"117","author":"Dekker","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199011000-00004","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study","volume":"76","author":"Flamm","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199609053351001","article-title":"Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section","volume":"335","author":"McMahon","year":"1996","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001184","article-title":"Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study","volume":"9","author":"Fitzpatrick","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70319-4","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery","volume":"181","author":"Zelop","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.10.017","article-title":"Risk factors for complete uterine rupture","volume":"216","author":"Al-Zirqi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib34","first-page":"313","article-title":"Risk factors for uterine rupture among women who attempt a vaginal birth after a previous cesarean: a case-control study","volume":"56","author":"Barger","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Reprod Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021","article-title":"Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates?","volume":"126","author":"Kiran","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001668329","article-title":"The effect of gestational age on trial of labor after Cesarean section","volume":"15","author":"Hammoud","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000179389.82986.50","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation","volume":"106","author":"Coassolo","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib38","first-page":"391","article-title":"Trial of labor after 40 weeks' gestation in women with prior cesarean","volume":"97","author":"Zelop","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib39","first-page":"585","article-title":"The association of maternal age and symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"99","author":"Shipp","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1535","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13015","article-title":"The risk of uterine rupture is not increased with single- compared with double-layer closure: a Swedish cohort study","volume":"122","author":"Hesselman","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01233.x","article-title":"Poor uterine contractility in obese women","volume":"114","author":"Zhang","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1208","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01484.x","article-title":"Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: a population-based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden","volume":"114","author":"Kaczmarczyk","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1069","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02136.x","article-title":"Uterine rupture in The Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study","volume":"116","author":"Zwart","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-054540","article-title":"Epidemiology of uterine rupture among pregnant women in China and development of a risk prediction model: analysis of data from a multicentre, cross-sectional study","volume":"11","author":"Zhan","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Open"}],"container-title":["eClinicalMedicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589537025000033?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589537025000033?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,2]],"date-time":"2025-03-02T00:57:08Z","timestamp":1740877028000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2589537025000033"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"references-count":42,"alternative-id":["S2589537025000033"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-5370"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-5370","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Inter-pregnancy interval and uterine rupture during a trial of labour after one previous caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births: a retrospective population-based cohort study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"eClinicalMedicine","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103071","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"103071"}}