{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,14]],"date-time":"2026-02-14T05:59:50Z","timestamp":1771048790711,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":67,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,11,1]],"date-time":"2013-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1383264000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Environmental Impact Assessment Review"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,12]],"date-time":"2013-06-12T16:50:48Z","timestamp":1371055848000},"page":"31-39","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":55,"special_numbering":"C","title":["A critique of the performance of EIA within the offshore oil and gas sector"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Adam","family":"Barker","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Carys","family":"Jones","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.marpolbul.2010.12.012","article-title":"Management of the marine environment: integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach","volume":"62","author":"Atkins","year":"2011","journal-title":"Mar Pollut Bull"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1016\/S0195-9255(99)00015-3","article-title":"Evaluation of the performance of the European EIA process","volume":"19","author":"Barker","year":"1999","journal-title":"Environ Impact Assess Rev"},{"issue":"4\u20135","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1016\/S0308-597X(98)00050-5","article-title":"The application of environmental assessment to marine developments and activities in Great Britain","volume":"23","author":"Budd","year":"1999","journal-title":"Mar Policy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2004.02.001","article-title":"Quality of environmental impact statements in Portugal and Spain","volume":"25","author":"Canelas","year":"2005","journal-title":"Environ Impact Assess Rev"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2618","DOI":"10.1139\/f96-218","article-title":"Sediment porewater toxicity assessment studies in the vicinity of offshore oil and gas production platforms in the Gulf of Mexico: Gulf of Mexico offshore operations monitoring experiment (GOOMEX), Canadian","volume":"53","author":"Carr","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Fish Aquat Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1142\/S1464333202001121","article-title":"An evaluation of the quality of environmental impact statements in Thessaloniki, Greece","volume":"494","author":"Cashmore","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Environ Assess Policy Manag"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.3152\/147154604781765860","article-title":"The interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory","volume":"22","author":"Cashmore","year":"2004","journal-title":"Impact Assess Proj Apprais"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0040","series-title":"Guidance on EIA: EIS review","author":"Commission of the European Community","year":"2001"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0045","series-title":"OSPAR recommendation 2003\/5 to promote the use and implementation of environmental management systems by the offshore industry","author":"Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR)","year":"2003"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0050","series-title":"OSPAR report on discharges, spills and emissions from offshore oil and gas installations in 2009","author":"Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR)","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0055","series-title":"Strategy of the OSPAR Commission for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic 2010\u20132020","author":"Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR)","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1126\/science.281.5374.198","article-title":"Principles for sustainable governance of the oceans","volume":"281","author":"Costanza","year":"1998","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/S0141-1136(99)00043-4","article-title":"Chronic toxicity and physical disturbance effects of water and oil based drilling fluids and some major constituents on adult sea scallops","volume":"48","author":"Cranford","year":"1999","journal-title":"Mar Environ Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0070","first-page":"772","article-title":"Essential ecological insights for marine ecosystem-based management and marine spatial planning","volume":"32","author":"Crowder","year":"2008","journal-title":"Mar Pollut Bull"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1036","DOI":"10.1006\/jmsc.1996.0129","article-title":"On the short-term and long term impact of drilling activities in the Dutch sector of the North Sea","volume":"53","author":"Daan","year":"1996","journal-title":"ICES J Mar Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0080","series-title":"Charting progress 2: the state of the UK seas","author":"Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0085","series-title":"Guidance notes on the offshore petroleum production and pipelines (assessment of environmental effects) regulations 1999 (as amended)","author":"Department of Energy and Climate Change","year":"2011"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.1016\/j.marpol.2008.03.021","article-title":"The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management","volume":"32","author":"Douvere","year":"2008","journal-title":"Mar Policy"},{"issue":"1\u20135","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.marpolbul.2008.04.030","article-title":"The science and management of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea: natural history, present threats and future challenges","volume":"57","author":"Ducrotoy","year":"2008","journal-title":"Mar Pollut Bull"},{"issue":"1\u20136","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/S0025-326X(00)00099-0","article-title":"The North Sea","volume":"41","author":"Ducrotoy","year":"2000","journal-title":"Mar Pollut Bull"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1474-919X.2006.00510.x","article-title":"Information needs to support environmental impacts assessment of the effects of European marine offshore wind farms on birds","volume":"148","author":"Fox","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ibis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0110","first-page":"55","article-title":"Quality and quality control in environmental impact assessment","volume":"vol. 2","author":"Fuller","year":"1999"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0115","series-title":"Introduction to environmental impact assessment","author":"Glasson","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0120","series-title":"Ecosystem services and guidance: biodiversity and ecosystem services guide and checklists","author":"Global Oil and Gas Industry Association for Environmental and Social Issues (IPIECA)","year":"2011"},{"issue":"1\u201312","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/S0025-326X(99)00059-4","article-title":"Using science for better protection of the marine environment","volume":"39","author":"Gray","year":"1999","journal-title":"Mar Pollut Bull"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1301","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-1739.2007.00752.x","article-title":"Evaluating and ranking the vulnerability of global marine ecosystems to anthropogenic threats","volume":"21","author":"Halpern","year":"2007","journal-title":"Conserv Biol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1141","DOI":"10.1016\/S0025-326X(99)00144-7","article-title":"Potential impact of production chemicals on the toxicity of produced water discharges from the North Sea","volume":"38","author":"Henderson","year":"1999","journal-title":"Mar Pollut Bull"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1016\/S0025-326X(01)00197-7","article-title":"The acute and chronic effects of wastes associated with offshore oil and gas production on temperate and tropical marine ecological processes","volume":"44","author":"Holdway","year":"2002","journal-title":"Mar Pollut Bull"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ecolecon.2006.06.011","article-title":"Eco-efficient environmental policy in oil and gas production in the Netherlands","volume":"61","author":"Huppes","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ecol Econ"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2006.12.001","article-title":"Environmental impact assessment; retrospect and prospect","volume":"27","author":"Jay","year":"2007","journal-title":"Environ Impact Assess Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0160","first-page":"201","article-title":"Screening, scoping and consideration of alternatives","volume":"vol. 2","author":"Jones","year":"1999"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1080\/14615517.2012.672671","article-title":"The quality of environmental impact statements and environmental impact assessment practice in Bangladesh","volume":"30","author":"Kabir","year":"2012","journal-title":"Impact Assess Proj Apprais"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0170","series-title":"The ecosystem approach to marine planning and management","author":"Kidd","year":"2011"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1080\/13501769880000041","article-title":"Coping with Europe: the impact of British and German administrations on the implementation of EU environmental policy","volume":"5","author":"Knill","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Eur Public Policy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb1000","first-page":"137","article-title":"Reviewing the quality of environmental assessments","author":"Lee","year":"2000"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0180","series-title":"Reviewing the quality of environmental statements","author":"Lee","year":"1990"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0185","series-title":"Reviewing the quality of environmental statements and environmental appraisals","author":"Lee","year":"1999"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0195","series-title":"Theoretical perspectives on EIA","author":"Leknes","year":"2002"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0200","series-title":"Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis report","author":"Millennium Ecosystem Assessment","year":"2005"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb9000","first-page":"5","article-title":"Environmental inpact assessment: the state of the art","volume":"30","author":"Morgan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Environ Impact Assess Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb9005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2011.02.002","article-title":"Practitioners, professional cultures, and perceptions of impact assessment","volume":"32","author":"Morgan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Environ Impact Assess Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0205","first-page":"1","article-title":"A critical review of the adequacy of EIA reports\u2014evidence from Pakistan","volume":"1","author":"Nadeem","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Hum Soc Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0335","series-title":"International Council for the Exploration of the Sea","first-page":"599","article-title":"The Norwegian ecosystem-based management plan for the Barents Sea","author":"Olsen","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.3354\/meps122277","article-title":"A comprehensive analysis of the effects of offshore oil and gas exploration and production on the benthic communities of the Norwegian continental shelf","volume":"122","author":"Olsgard","year":"1995","journal-title":"Mar Ecol Prog Ser"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0220","first-page":"352","article-title":"Controls on project proponents and environmental impact effectiveness","volume":"15","author":"Ortolano","year":"1993","journal-title":"Environ Prof"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0225","series-title":"Introduction to environmental impact assessment","first-page":"379","article-title":"Environmental impact statement review package","author":"Oxford Brookes University","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0235","series-title":"Environmental impact of the offshore oil and gas industry","author":"Patin","year":"1999"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2009.08.009","article-title":"Quality of environmental impact statements and variability and scrutiny by reviewers","volume":"30","author":"Peterson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Environ Impact Assess Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2006.10.005","article-title":"The quality of Portuguese environmental impact studies: the case of small hydropower projects","volume":"27","author":"Pinho","year":"2007","journal-title":"Environ Impact Assess Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0245","series-title":"Expert systems and geographical information systems for impact assessment","author":"Rodriguez-Bachiller","year":"2004"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1641\/B580110","article-title":"Marine ecosystem-based management in practice: scientific and governance challenges","volume":"58","author":"Ruckelshaus","year":"2008","journal-title":"Bioscience"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0255","series-title":"EIA process strengthening workshop","article-title":"EIA process strengthening: perspectives and priorities","author":"Sadler","year":"1997"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0260","series-title":"Assessing impact: handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up","first-page":"248","article-title":"On evaluating the success of EIA and SEA","author":"Sadler","year":"2004"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0265","series-title":"Country status reports on environmental impact assessment","author":"Sadler","year":"1997"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1080\/09640560010702","article-title":"Environmental pollution challenges and associated planning and management issues facing offshore oil and gas field development in the UK","volume":"43","author":"Salter","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Environ Plan Manag"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/S0025-326X(00)00115-6","article-title":"Holistic environmental assessment and offshore oil field exploration and production","volume":"42","author":"Salter","year":"2001","journal-title":"Mar Pollut Bull"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2007.07.002","article-title":"A review of report quality in the North West province of South Africa","volume":"28","author":"Sandham","year":"2008","journal-title":"Environ Impact Assess Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2011.11.001","article-title":"Purposes, paradigms and pressure groups: accountability and sustainability in EU environmental assessment, 1985\u20132010","volume":"33","author":"Sheate","year":"2012","journal-title":"Environ Impact Assess Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1016\/S0195-9255(00)00061-5","article-title":"Looking at the quality of draft environmental impact statements over time in the United States: have ratings improved?","volume":"20","author":"Tzoumis","year":"2000","journal-title":"Environ Impact Assess Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0290","series-title":"Accounting for economic activities in large marine ecosystems and regional seas","author":"United Nations Environment Programme","year":"2006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1016\/S0964-5691(02)00104-7","article-title":"The regional approach to the ocean, the ocean regions, and ocean regionalisation\u2014a post-modern dilemma","volume":"45","author":"Vallega","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ocean Coast Manag"},{"issue":"19","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0305","first-page":"1","article-title":"Explaining variations in implementation of EU directives","volume":"8","author":"Versluis","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur Integr Online Pap"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1080\/713691879","article-title":"Reviewing environmental statements: new demands for the UK's EIA procedures","volume":"15","author":"Weston","year":"2000","journal-title":"Plan Pract Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0310","first-page":"223","article-title":"Environmental Statements, environmental information, environmental assessment and the UK planning process","volume":"12","author":"Weston","year":"1997","journal-title":"Proc Apprais"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1285","DOI":"10.1016\/S0025-326X(01)00096-0","article-title":"Seabirds at risk around offshore oil platforms in the North-west Atlantic","volume":"42","author":"Wiese","year":"2001","journal-title":"Mar Pollut Bull"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0325","series-title":"Environmental impact assessment: a comparative review","author":"Wood","year":"2003"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001_bb0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eiar.2005.02.001","article-title":"EIA scoping in England and Wales: practitioner approaches, perspectives and constraints","volume":"26","author":"Wood","year":"2006","journal-title":"Environ Impact Assess Rev"}],"container-title":["Environmental Impact Assessment Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0195925513000528?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0195925513000528?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,15]],"date-time":"2018-10-15T09:56:08Z","timestamp":1539597368000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0195925513000528"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]},"references-count":67,"alternative-id":["S0195925513000528"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["0195-9255"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0195-9255","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A critique of the performance of EIA within the offshore oil and gas sector","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eiar.2013.05.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}