{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T17:34:40Z","timestamp":1786988080095,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,6,1]],"date-time":"2005-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1117584000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,5,10]],"date-time":"2005-05-10T17:49:22Z","timestamp":1115747362000},"page":"164-169","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":64,"title":["Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"120","author":[{"given":"O.","family":"Gelisen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Caliskan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Dilbaz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Ozdas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B.","family":"Dilbaz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Ozdas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Haberal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib1","unstructured":"ACOG. Practice patterns: management of postterm pregnancy, number 6, October 1997. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1997; 60: 86\u201391."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"658","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349709024606","article-title":"Stillbirths and rate of neonatal deaths in 76761 postterm pregnancies in Sweden. 1982\u20131991: a register study","volume":"76","author":"Ingemarsson","year":"1997","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)00862-0","article-title":"Forty weeks and beyond: pregnancy outcomes by week of gestation","volume":"96","author":"Alexander","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib4","series-title":"Interventions to Prevent or Improve Outcome of Labor at or Beyond Term","author":"Crowley","year":"2001"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08433.x","article-title":"Trends in births at and beyond term: evidence of change","volume":"106","author":"Roberts","year":"1999","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1998.tb03065.x","article-title":"Induction of labor for postterm pregnancy: an observational study","volume":"38","author":"Parry","year":"1998","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00377-4","article-title":"Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women","volume":"94","author":"Seyb","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)00794-8","article-title":"Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term","volume":"95","author":"Maslow","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01004.x","article-title":"Routine induction of labour at 41 weeks\u2019 gestation: nonsensus consensus","volume":"109","author":"Menticoglou","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib10","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of labor with misoprostol. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. Washington, DC: ACOG; 1999."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1616","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.107441","article-title":"Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction","volume":"182","author":"Ramsey","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1190","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(16)34294-6","article-title":"Observations on heart rate on pH in human fetus during labor","volume":"104","author":"Kubli","year":"1969","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib13","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Umbilical artery blood acid-base analysis. ACOG Technical Bulletin No.: 216. Washington: The College; 1995."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1113\/eph8602178","article-title":"Overview of current research in partrution","volume":"86","author":"Bernal","year":"2001","journal-title":"Exp Physiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70408-8","article-title":"Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain measurement dates","volume":"17","author":"Mongelli","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"911","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01354-0","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: induction of labor and cesarean births","volume":"97","author":"Alexander","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00374-2","article-title":"Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta analysis","volume":"89","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)01186-8","article-title":"A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"97","author":"Sciscione","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00842-1","article-title":"A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction","volume":"189","author":"Chung","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00105-2","article-title":"Prediction of adverse outcome associated with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction","volume":"110","author":"Meydanl\u0131","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur J Gynecol Obstet Reprod Biol"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.06.008","type":"expression_of_concern","label":"Expression of concern","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]],"date-time":"2024-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722470400000}}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211504004865?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211504004865?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,26]],"date-time":"2019-01-26T11:50:04Z","timestamp":1548503404000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211504004865"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,6]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0301211504004865"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,6]]}}}