{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,14]],"date-time":"2025-12-14T16:04:51Z","timestamp":1765728291957,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]],"date-time":"2006-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1146441600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]],"date-time":"2006-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1146441600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,10,11]],"date-time":"2005-10-11T07:23:11Z","timestamp":1129015391000},"page":"68-71","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"126","author":[{"given":"T.S. Usha","family":"Kiran","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Y.K.","family":"Chui","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jackie","family":"Bethel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P.S.","family":"Bhal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib1","first-page":"606","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of attempted vaginal birth after caesarean beyond the estimated date of delivery","volume":"44","author":"Callanhan","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib2","first-page":"332","article-title":"Delivery after previous caesarean section: a risk evaluation","volume":"93","author":"Christoph Rageth","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib3","first-page":"255","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean: a 10-year experience","volume":"84","author":"Miller","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"14","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70317-0","article-title":"Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labour in women with one or two prior caesarean deliveries","volume":"181","author":"Caughey","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(11)90765-0","article-title":"Risk factors associated with uterine rupture during trial of labour after caesarean delivery: a case-control study","volume":"168","author":"Leung","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl. 4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib6","first-page":"S69","article-title":"A 10-year population-based study of uterine rupture","volume":"97","author":"Baskett","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1184","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109048","article-title":"Effect of previous vaginal delivery on the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labour","volume":"183","author":"Zelop","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib8","first-page":"880","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section at the University of Texas","volume":"37","author":"Nguyen","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"1 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70393-9","article-title":"Predictive score for vaginal birth after caesarean section","volume":"174","author":"Weinstein","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl. 4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S79","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)00765-1","article-title":"Outcomes of trial of labour following previous caesarean beyond the estimated date of delivery","volume":"95","author":"Zelop","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(99)00069-X","article-title":"Thickness of the lower uteine segment: it's influence in the management of patients with previous caesarean sections","volume":"87","author":"Rozenberg","year":"1999","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.186","article-title":"The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates","volume":"188","author":"Elkousy","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.117361","article-title":"Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000g","volume":"185","author":"Zelop","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib14","first-page":"175","article-title":"Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture","volume":"97","author":"Shipp","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001668329","article-title":"The effect of gestational age on trial of labor after cesarean section","volume":"15","author":"Hammoud","year":"2004","journal-title":"Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115044","article-title":"Failed vaginal birth after a caesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity","volume":"184","author":"Hibbard","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1576","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.114855","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes after uterine rupture in labour","volume":"184","author":"Yap","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1119","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90646-7","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a reappraisal of risk","volume":"161","author":"Yetman","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2004.07.023","article-title":"Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section","volume":"87","author":"Sen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211505004197?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211505004197?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:14:41Z","timestamp":1759554881000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211505004197"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,5]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S0301211505004197"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2005 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}