{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]],"date-time":"2026-07-03T08:38:38Z","timestamp":1783067918522,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1-2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,9,1]],"date-time":"2006-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1157068800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,9,1]],"date-time":"2006-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1157068800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,23]],"date-time":"2006-05-23T16:49:47Z","timestamp":1148402987000},"page":"267-269","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: A randomized study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"128","author":[{"given":"Zahra","family":"Zareian","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Parvin","family":"Zareian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-199412000-00005","article-title":"Is peritoneal closure necessary?","volume":"49","author":"Duffy","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)48975-2","article-title":"Ovarian surgery in an infertility patient as an indication for a short-interval second-look laparoscopy: a preliminary study","volume":"44","author":"Pittaway","year":"1985","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)48438-4","article-title":"Adhesion formation after tubal surgery: results of the eighth-day laparoscopy in 188 patients","volume":"43","author":"Trimbos-Kemper","year":"1985","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib4","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (United Kingdom). Peritoneal closure. Guideline, 2002; 15: 1\u20137."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib5","first-page":"225","article-title":"A histological evaluation of peritoneal injury and repair: implications for adhesion formation","volume":"70","author":"Elkins","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib6","series-title":"Pelvic pain","author":"Perry","year":"2000"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S1072-7515(97)00127-0","article-title":"Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditure in the United States in 1994","volume":"186","author":"Ray","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib8","first-page":"169","article-title":"Adhesion: prevention and complication in general surgery","volume":"163","author":"Holmdahl","year":"1997","journal-title":"Eur J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1080\/00016349808565823","article-title":"Randomized study of non-closure of peritoneum in lower segment cesarean section","volume":"77","author":"Grundsell","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11083.x","article-title":"The impact of adhesions on hospital readmissions over ten years after 8849 open gynecological operations: an assessment from the Surgical and Clinical Adhesion Research Study","volume":"107","author":"Lower","year":"2000","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70686-5","article-title":"Closure or non closure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery","volume":"174","author":"Nagele","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib12","first-page":"153","article-title":"Non-closure of parietal and visceral peritoneum during cesarean section","volume":"53","author":"Kumar","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib13","first-page":"759","article-title":"A randomized controlled study of peritoneal closure at cesarean section","volume":"21","author":"Galaal","year":"2000","journal-title":"Saudi Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09839.x","article-title":"Nonclosure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"103","author":"Irion","year":"1996","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199102000-00027","article-title":"Peritoneal closure or non-closure at cesarean","volume":"77","author":"Pietrantoni","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib16","first-page":"1007","article-title":"Closure vs non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 year study","volume":"87","author":"Weerawetwat","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021_bib17","first-page":"240","article-title":"Lower adhesion risk: peritoneal closure after primary cesarean","volume":"5","author":"Lyell","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol News"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211506002004?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211506002004?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:16:31Z","timestamp":1759554991000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211506002004"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,9]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1-2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0301211506002004"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: A randomized study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}