{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,14]],"date-time":"2025-12-14T12:03:41Z","timestamp":1765713821413,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,1]],"date-time":"2007-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1177977600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,1]],"date-time":"2007-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1177977600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,7,12]],"date-time":"2006-07-12T09:34:59Z","timestamp":1152696899000},"page":"27-34","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Maternal request CS\u2014Role of hospital teaching status and for-profit ownership"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"132","author":[{"given":"Sudha","family":"Xirasagar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Herng-Ching","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000102935.91389.53","article-title":"Institutional factors in cesarean delivery rates: policy and research implications","volume":"103","author":"Lin","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1397","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.319.7222.1397","article-title":"Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study","volume":"319","author":"Belizan","year":"1999","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib3","unstructured":"Medical Letter on the CDC & FDA editors. Obstetrics; Rising cesarean rate is cause for alarm, say nurse\u2013midwives. Medical Letter on the CDC & FDA 2003 Feb 9."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib4","first-page":"1118","article-title":"Caesarean section rate in England reaches 22%","volume":"324","author":"Mayor","year":"2002","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(03)00217-0","article-title":"Cesarean section for non-medical reasons","volume":"82","author":"Penna","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.0312.x","article-title":"Danish obstetricians\u2019 personal preference","volume":"83","author":"Bergholt","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610120059914","article-title":"Maternal request for cesarean section: is it obstetrician driven?","volume":"21","author":"Irvine","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1080\/01443619867812","article-title":"The influence of maternal request on the elective caesarean section rate","volume":"18","author":"Jackson","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib9","first-page":"I26","article-title":"Caesarean section on demand","volume":"II","author":"Kerr-Wilson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Curr Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(03)00319-9","article-title":"Cesarean delivery on maternal request in Italy","volume":"84","author":"Tranquilli","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.217","article-title":"Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway","volume":"188","author":"Kolas","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"580","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.1999.tb127903.x","article-title":"Women's role and satisfaction in the decision to have a caesarean section","volume":"170","author":"Turnbull","year":"1999","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1398","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90898-H","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean or repeat cesarean section: medical risks or social realities?","volume":"162","author":"Kirk","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.1997.00124.pp.x","article-title":"Cesarean sections: women's choice for giving birth?","volume":"24","author":"Hemminki","year":"1997","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1523-536x.2000.00256.x","article-title":"Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature","volume":"27","author":"Gamble","year":"2000","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1097\/00005237-200112000-00004","article-title":"The case against elective cesarean section","volume":"15","author":"Goer","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Perinat Neonatal Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib17","first-page":"1137","article-title":"Property rights and economic theory: a survey of recent literature","volume":"10","author":"Furubotn","year":"1972","journal-title":"J Econ Lit"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib18","first-page":"1","article-title":"The four problems faced by Taiwanese healthcare markets","volume":"31","author":"Chen","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hospital"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib19","first-page":"36","article-title":"How to solve the mal-distribution of residents among hospitals in Taiwan?","volume":"30","author":"Chen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Hospital"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1006\/pmed.1996.0044","article-title":"Cesarean section rates by type of maternity unit and level of obstetric care","volume":"25","author":"Di Lallo","year":"1996","journal-title":"Prev Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"848","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.133","article-title":"Maternal Age and the Likelihood of Maternal Request for Cesarean Delivery: A Five-year Population-based Study","volume":"192","author":"Lin","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1109","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.83.8.1109","article-title":"Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State","volume":"83","author":"McKenzie","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1136\/jech.54.8.631","article-title":"Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals","volume":"54","author":"Librero","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Epidemiol Community Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1080\/13557858.1998.9961850","article-title":"Caesarean section rates in South Africa: evidence of bias among different \u2018population groups\u2019","volume":"3","author":"Matshidze","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ethn Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.2307\/2135690","article-title":"Cesarean section rates, reasons for operations vary between countries","volume":"22","author":"Turner","year":"1990","journal-title":"Fam Plann Perspect"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"955","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.77.8.955","article-title":"Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980\u201385 rise","volume":"77","author":"Taffel","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(91)90149-J","article-title":"Epidemic of caesarean sections in Brazil","volume":"338","author":"Barros","year":"1991","journal-title":"Lancet"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211506002922?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211506002922?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:16:33Z","timestamp":1759554993000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211506002922"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S0301211506002922"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Maternal request CS\u2014Role of hospital teaching status and for-profit ownership","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.022","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}