{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,16]],"date-time":"2025-12-16T12:08:53Z","timestamp":1765886933476,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,1]],"date-time":"2007-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1177977600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,1]],"date-time":"2007-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1177977600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,8,2]],"date-time":"2006-08-02T17:44:58Z","timestamp":1154540698000},"page":"70-75","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":26,"title":["Trends in obstetric interventions in the Dutch obstetrical care system in the period 1993\u20132002"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"132","author":[{"given":"A.","family":"Kwee","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P.M.","family":"Elferink-Stinkens","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P.J.H.M.","family":"Reuwer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H.W.","family":"Bruinse","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM198702123160706","article-title":"Comparisons of national cesarean section rates","volume":"316","author":"Notzon","year":"1987","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib2","first-page":"815","article-title":"Editorial: what is the right number of caesarean sections","volume":"348","author":"Anonymous","year":"1997","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(93)92874-S","article-title":"What is happening to caesarean section rates?","volume":"342","author":"Mcfarlane","year":"1993","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1199","DOI":"10.1016\/0277-9536(93)90332-X","article-title":"Caearean section in Britain and the United States 12% or 24%: is either the right rate?","volume":"37","author":"Francome","year":"1993","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib5","first-page":"1","article-title":"Correlation of decrease in perinatal mortality and increase in caesarean section rates","volume":"61","author":"O\u2019Driscoll","year":"1983","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(95)02050-3","article-title":"Trends in caesarean section rates among high- and medium risk pregnancies in the Netherlands","volume":"59","author":"Elferink-Stinkens","year":"1995","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(00)00295-5","article-title":"The perinatal database of the Netherlands","volume":"94","author":"Elferink-Stinkens","year":"2001","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1983.tb09279.x","article-title":"Differences in the reported frequencies of some obstetrical interventions in Europe","volume":"90","author":"Bergsjo","year":"1983","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib9","first-page":"1","article-title":"National Center for Health Statistics. Births: preliminary data for 2003","volume":"53","author":"Hamilton","year":"2004","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib10","unstructured":"National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Caesarean section. Clinical Guideline 2004. RCOG."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib11","first-page":"6","article-title":"Perinatal health indicators in 2001 and its evolution since 1994. Results from the Audipog sentinel network","volume":"30","author":"Mammelle","year":"2002","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib12","first-page":"516","article-title":"Deliveries, mothers and newborn infants in Sweden 1973\u20132000. Trends in obstetrics as reported to the Swedish Medical Birth Register","volume":"82","author":"Odlind","year":"2003","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib13","first-page":"1522","article-title":"The epidemic of caesarean section: has it reached Norway?","volume":"123","author":"Backe","year":"2003","journal-title":"Tidsskr Nor Laegforen"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib14","unstructured":"Berghs G, Spanjaards E. De normale zwangerschap, bevalling en beleid. Ph.D. Thesis on normal pregnancy and delivery. Nijmegen University; 1988."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib15","unstructured":"Heres MHB, Pel M, Hart AAM, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Treffers PE. Practice patterns and provider associated differences. Thesis. University of Amsterdam; 1995. p. 109\u201317."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1054\/midw.2001.0284","article-title":"Swedish midwives\u2019 care of women who are at high obstetric risk or who have obstetric complications","volume":"17","author":"Berg","year":"2001","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib17","unstructured":"RCOG. Guideline no.26. Operative vaginal delivery. Revised; November 2004."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"592","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610020001404","article-title":"Trends in obstetric care in the United Kingdom","volume":"20","author":"O\u2019Connell","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"920","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2003.09.007","article-title":"Instrumental extraction in 2002 in the \u201cAURORE\u201d hospital: incidence and serious neonatal complications","volume":"31","author":"Dupuis","year":"2003","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib20","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2002","volume":"52","author":"Martin","year":"2003","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib21","first-page":"120","article-title":"National trends in labor induction 1989\u20131998","volume":"47","author":"Zhang","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib22","first-page":"638","article-title":"Survey of the practice of cervical ripening and labor induction in France","volume":"32","author":"Goffinet","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Wilian AR for the Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 2000;356:1375\u201383.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00317.x","article-title":"The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35.453 term breech infants","volume":"112","author":"Rietberg","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.08.039","article-title":"Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial","volume":"194","author":"Glezerman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.056","article-title":"Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized term breech trial","volume":"191","author":"Whyte","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib27","first-page":"173","article-title":"Multiple birth prevalence in The Netherlands. Impact of maternal age and assisted reproductive techniques","volume":"43","author":"Steegers-Theunissen","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00328-2","article-title":"Changes in perinatal care and survival in very preterm and extremely preterm infants in The Netherlands between 1983 and 1995","volume":"112","author":"Anthony","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib29","unstructured":"Reuwer PJHM, Bruinse HW. Preventive support of labour: een uitdagingvoor verloskundigen, gynaecologen en beleidsmaker. Van Zuiden Communications bv, Alphen aan de Rijn. The Netherlands, ISBN 90-76906-29-7 (adapted English version in progress)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.058","article-title":"Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate\u2014a population-based screening study","volume":"190","author":"Weiss","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib31","first-page":"910","article-title":"Canobstetric complications explain the high levels of obstetric interventions and maternity service use among older women? A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data","volume":"108","author":"Bell","year":"2001","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib32","first-page":"917","article-title":"Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term","volume":"95","author":"Maslow","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1565","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.458","article-title":"Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix","volume":"188","author":"Johnson","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","article-title":"Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"105","author":"Vrouwenraets","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(94)90115-5","article-title":"Differences in obstetrical intervention rates between Dutch hospitals","volume":"53","author":"Elferink-Stinkens","year":"1994","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S030121150600368X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S030121150600368X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T05:17:26Z","timestamp":1759555046000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S030121150600368X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S030121150600368X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Trends in obstetric interventions in the Dutch obstetrical care system in the period 1993\u20132002","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.018","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}